?  

1072 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes, I only use other browsers for the tabs
      159
    • Yes, I just want the enhanced security
      86
    • I already use IE
      266
    • No, I need my mouse gestures and other features
      276
    • No, M$ is 73h $uck
      207
    • No, i use linux/OSX and MS doesnt like me
      59
    • No, i use win 9x/2k and MS doesnt care about me
      19


Recommended Posts

When have they ever done that aside from IE?

They were still going to develop IE for longhorn regardless.

585960954[/snapback]

That I'm aware of this happened to IE, but one of microsoft's employees (lead programmer of a project) who was giving a speech at my university said (strangely enough but honestly enough) that's how they usually do things...

MS shouldn't have waited this long to separate IE from the OS ..

585961603[/snapback]

Uh.. who said it's going to be any more "seperated" from the OS than it is in 9x/2000/XP? It's still going to use other shared components from Longhorn and be bundled with the OS
That I'm aware of this happened to IE, but one of microsoft's employees (lead programmer of a project) who was giving a speech at my university said (strangely enough but honestly enough) that's how they usually do things...

585961860[/snapback]

Well first of all, don't even bother bringing it up unless you at least have some examples to back your statements up.

Second, it was probably misperceived. Microsoft simply can't win. If they keep putting updates out, they are accused of just trying to make more money. If they don't, they are accused of not caring about their users.

IE would have to have inbuilt pop-up stoppers. Firefox let's through about 3 a day, with IE that goes up to about 300 and I don't want to download extra pap just to get rid of my pop-ups.

I use both, firefox and IE, but my dad pretty much has to use IE for his internet banking, and surprise surprise, it doesn't work (won't load up new windows) there's macro$hite for ya.

But I wouldn't Switch, but I would download it, and use it.

Regarding CSS2 support, does any browser have full CSS2 support? I don't thinkt they do...

585962290[/snapback]

Safari is the closest to it, but no, none support it fully. Safari is also the only browser to pass the ACID Test.

Score one for OS X.

On topic though, no. Opera is more than good enough for me, and I've yet to come across a site that is entirely broken in it. But then, I don't bank online. Tabs and the other features are all good ideas, so well done Microsoft. It just doesn't help that they've taken this long to incorporate the features other browsers have had for years, and even then limit the userbase to XP or better.

IE would have to have inbuilt pop-up stoppers. Firefox let's through about 3 a day, with IE that goes up to about 300 and I don't want to download extra pap just to get rid of my pop-ups.

I use both, firefox and IE, but my dad pretty much has to use IE for his internet banking, and surprise surprise, it doesn't work (won't load up new windows) there's macro$hite for ya.

But I wouldn't Switch, but I would download it, and use it.

585962281[/snapback]

firsly, WHAT SITES DO YOU VISIT?!

With IE i havnt got a single pop-up since service pack 2... because Ie DOES have popup stoppers along with many other features. with firefox I have only ever got a single popup.

You must have alot of adware.

Either way I will soon be on Safari too, three nice browsers.

Well first of all, don't even bother bringing it up unless you at least have some examples to back your statements up.

Second, it was probably misperceived.  Microsoft simply can't win. If they keep putting updates out, they are accused of just trying to make more money.  If they don't, they are accused of not caring about their users.

585962235[/snapback]

I'm sorry, I thought I had IE to back my statement up, but it seems that's really not enough for you. I don't work at Microsoft, the guy who gave the speech does, so he probably has more to back up his statement than I do, if you don't accept this fine, that's your right.

Second, where did you hear that Microsoft is accused of trying to make money when they release updates??? That's nonsense, people want Microsoft to improve their products...not only Microsoft, but most companies who update their software on a regular basis gain respect of people, because it shows they care about their product. I think most people want to see how IE 7 will turn out to be because most at least hope that Microsoft will address many issues with that release.

I'm sorry, I thought I had IE to back my statement up, but it seems that's really not enough for you. I don't work at Microsoft, the guy who gave the speech does, so he probably has more to back up his statement than I do, if you don't accept this fine, that's your right.

Second, where did you hear that Microsoft is accused of trying to make money when they release updates??? That's nonsense, people want Microsoft to improve their products...not only Microsoft, but most companies who update their software on a regular basis gain respect of people, because it shows they care about their product. I think most people want to see how IE 7 will turn out to be because most at least hope that Microsoft will address many issues with that release.

585963665[/snapback]

I said examples, not example. You said they do it all the time, so I wanted something besides IE. I have a friend that works at MS and thinks what you said is a joke. So we're on an even playing field in that regard. If you can't back yourself up, then shut up.

I hear people accusing MS is just trying to make money ALL the time. Not neccesarily here at Neowin, but just about everywhere else.

I would update to IE7, and only use it for certain websites such as Microsoft Update. Firefox is used for other browsing. I don't want to switch back to a browser where thousands of exploits and spyware injections are possible because I know IE7 will be too similar to previous versions of IE for it to be secure.

Already use IE and nothing will make me switch, I don't trust open source and I'm not going to pay $$$ for a browser (like Opera)

You do know you can see the code to open source software, right? Its a lot easier to trust something that you and the community can see, unlike trying to trust MS with IE.

I said examples, not example.  You said they do it all the time, so I wanted something besides IE.  I have a friend that works at MS and thinks what you said is a joke.  So we're on an even playing field in that regard.  If you can't back yourself up, then shut up.

I hear people accusing MS is just trying to make money ALL the time.  Not neccesarily here at Neowin, but just about everywhere else.

585966166[/snapback]

No, you shut up...it's really easy to say I have a friend at Microsoft who says you're lying...What I said in the first place was:

Totally agree... as soon as m$ has the market they simply drop development until the competitors start to steal users. That's m$ history.

I was referring to IE as the previous poster was talking about IE, I don't know where you picked up I was referring to MS in general...I meant to say in the history of IE but then again you seem to want a flame war here...

Fine, you don't believe what I say...I don't believe what you say... you can believe what your friend say...believe that everyone thinks Microsoft wants to make money when they release updates... go be a m$ fanboy, now please just drop it and leave me alone I'm tired and through with this. It's just becoming childish :sleep:

No, you shut up...it's really easy to say I have a friend at Microsoft who says you're lying...What I said in the first place was:

I was referring to IE as the previous poster was talking about IE, I don't know where you picked up I was referring to MS in general...I meant to say in the history of IE but then again you seem to want a flame war here...

Fine, you don't believe what I say...I don't believe what you say... you can believe what your friend say...believe that everyone thinks Microsoft wants to make money when they release updates... go be a m$ fanboy, now please just drop it and leave me alone I'm tired and through with this. It's just? becoming childish?:sleep:p:

585966244[/snapback]

No. What you said HEAVILY implies multiple instances. When you say something they did once is their HISTORY, it is always assumed that they do it all the time unless specified otherwise.

Also, in response to your original statement, I asked when they have done it besides IE. All you could muster is saying that a MS employee once said they is usually how they do things with no actual examples.

Yeah.. I'm sure an employee at MS would talk **** about them while working there.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so... And there is not one Windows platform. This is the mistake ALL Apple oriented people make. Apple is one OEM. You could reasonably compare them to one PC OEM, say Dell or HP. But you can't compare them to ALL PC OEMs. Case in point, Apple has NO touch screen MacBooks. No tablet Macs. There are no rugged Macs. The variety of PC OEM design is insane. With Apple, you have... Apple. The problem is that you're starting with Apple as the definition of "good" then filtering out anything that isn't close to an existing Apple product, then trying to homogenise all of those left into a fictional product line and then ignore any innovations to create a minimal feature subset so you can say "See! Apple better!" PS: I was an Apple dev for 17 years and helped develop MacInTalk and disability solutions for Apple, and worked on Microsoft Office for MacOS - and I have several Macs and MacBooks - so tread very carefully.
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!