?  

1072 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes, I only use other browsers for the tabs
      159
    • Yes, I just want the enhanced security
      86
    • I already use IE
      266
    • No, I need my mouse gestures and other features
      276
    • No, M$ is 73h $uck
      207
    • No, i use linux/OSX and MS doesnt like me
      59
    • No, i use win 9x/2k and MS doesnt care about me
      19


Recommended Posts

When have they ever done that aside from IE?

They were still going to develop IE for longhorn regardless.

585960954[/snapback]

That I'm aware of this happened to IE, but one of microsoft's employees (lead programmer of a project) who was giving a speech at my university said (strangely enough but honestly enough) that's how they usually do things...

MS shouldn't have waited this long to separate IE from the OS ..

585961603[/snapback]

Uh.. who said it's going to be any more "seperated" from the OS than it is in 9x/2000/XP? It's still going to use other shared components from Longhorn and be bundled with the OS
That I'm aware of this happened to IE, but one of microsoft's employees (lead programmer of a project) who was giving a speech at my university said (strangely enough but honestly enough) that's how they usually do things...

585961860[/snapback]

Well first of all, don't even bother bringing it up unless you at least have some examples to back your statements up.

Second, it was probably misperceived. Microsoft simply can't win. If they keep putting updates out, they are accused of just trying to make more money. If they don't, they are accused of not caring about their users.

IE would have to have inbuilt pop-up stoppers. Firefox let's through about 3 a day, with IE that goes up to about 300 and I don't want to download extra pap just to get rid of my pop-ups.

I use both, firefox and IE, but my dad pretty much has to use IE for his internet banking, and surprise surprise, it doesn't work (won't load up new windows) there's macro$hite for ya.

But I wouldn't Switch, but I would download it, and use it.

Regarding CSS2 support, does any browser have full CSS2 support? I don't thinkt they do...

585962290[/snapback]

Safari is the closest to it, but no, none support it fully. Safari is also the only browser to pass the ACID Test.

Score one for OS X.

On topic though, no. Opera is more than good enough for me, and I've yet to come across a site that is entirely broken in it. But then, I don't bank online. Tabs and the other features are all good ideas, so well done Microsoft. It just doesn't help that they've taken this long to incorporate the features other browsers have had for years, and even then limit the userbase to XP or better.

IE would have to have inbuilt pop-up stoppers. Firefox let's through about 3 a day, with IE that goes up to about 300 and I don't want to download extra pap just to get rid of my pop-ups.

I use both, firefox and IE, but my dad pretty much has to use IE for his internet banking, and surprise surprise, it doesn't work (won't load up new windows) there's macro$hite for ya.

But I wouldn't Switch, but I would download it, and use it.

585962281[/snapback]

firsly, WHAT SITES DO YOU VISIT?!

With IE i havnt got a single pop-up since service pack 2... because Ie DOES have popup stoppers along with many other features. with firefox I have only ever got a single popup.

You must have alot of adware.

Either way I will soon be on Safari too, three nice browsers.

Well first of all, don't even bother bringing it up unless you at least have some examples to back your statements up.

Second, it was probably misperceived.  Microsoft simply can't win. If they keep putting updates out, they are accused of just trying to make more money.  If they don't, they are accused of not caring about their users.

585962235[/snapback]

I'm sorry, I thought I had IE to back my statement up, but it seems that's really not enough for you. I don't work at Microsoft, the guy who gave the speech does, so he probably has more to back up his statement than I do, if you don't accept this fine, that's your right.

Second, where did you hear that Microsoft is accused of trying to make money when they release updates??? That's nonsense, people want Microsoft to improve their products...not only Microsoft, but most companies who update their software on a regular basis gain respect of people, because it shows they care about their product. I think most people want to see how IE 7 will turn out to be because most at least hope that Microsoft will address many issues with that release.

I'm sorry, I thought I had IE to back my statement up, but it seems that's really not enough for you. I don't work at Microsoft, the guy who gave the speech does, so he probably has more to back up his statement than I do, if you don't accept this fine, that's your right.

Second, where did you hear that Microsoft is accused of trying to make money when they release updates??? That's nonsense, people want Microsoft to improve their products...not only Microsoft, but most companies who update their software on a regular basis gain respect of people, because it shows they care about their product. I think most people want to see how IE 7 will turn out to be because most at least hope that Microsoft will address many issues with that release.

585963665[/snapback]

I said examples, not example. You said they do it all the time, so I wanted something besides IE. I have a friend that works at MS and thinks what you said is a joke. So we're on an even playing field in that regard. If you can't back yourself up, then shut up.

I hear people accusing MS is just trying to make money ALL the time. Not neccesarily here at Neowin, but just about everywhere else.

I would update to IE7, and only use it for certain websites such as Microsoft Update. Firefox is used for other browsing. I don't want to switch back to a browser where thousands of exploits and spyware injections are possible because I know IE7 will be too similar to previous versions of IE for it to be secure.

Already use IE and nothing will make me switch, I don't trust open source and I'm not going to pay $$$ for a browser (like Opera)

You do know you can see the code to open source software, right? Its a lot easier to trust something that you and the community can see, unlike trying to trust MS with IE.

I said examples, not example.  You said they do it all the time, so I wanted something besides IE.  I have a friend that works at MS and thinks what you said is a joke.  So we're on an even playing field in that regard.  If you can't back yourself up, then shut up.

I hear people accusing MS is just trying to make money ALL the time.  Not neccesarily here at Neowin, but just about everywhere else.

585966166[/snapback]

No, you shut up...it's really easy to say I have a friend at Microsoft who says you're lying...What I said in the first place was:

Totally agree... as soon as m$ has the market they simply drop development until the competitors start to steal users. That's m$ history.

I was referring to IE as the previous poster was talking about IE, I don't know where you picked up I was referring to MS in general...I meant to say in the history of IE but then again you seem to want a flame war here...

Fine, you don't believe what I say...I don't believe what you say... you can believe what your friend say...believe that everyone thinks Microsoft wants to make money when they release updates... go be a m$ fanboy, now please just drop it and leave me alone I'm tired and through with this. It's just becoming childish :sleep:

No, you shut up...it's really easy to say I have a friend at Microsoft who says you're lying...What I said in the first place was:

I was referring to IE as the previous poster was talking about IE, I don't know where you picked up I was referring to MS in general...I meant to say in the history of IE but then again you seem to want a flame war here...

Fine, you don't believe what I say...I don't believe what you say... you can believe what your friend say...believe that everyone thinks Microsoft wants to make money when they release updates... go be a m$ fanboy, now please just drop it and leave me alone I'm tired and through with this. It's just? becoming childish?:sleep:p:

585966244[/snapback]

No. What you said HEAVILY implies multiple instances. When you say something they did once is their HISTORY, it is always assumed that they do it all the time unless specified otherwise.

Also, in response to your original statement, I asked when they have done it besides IE. All you could muster is saying that a MS employee once said they is usually how they do things with no actual examples.

Yeah.. I'm sure an employee at MS would talk **** about them while working there.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!