• 0

The Definitive "BEST ANTIVIRUS" thread


Best Antivirus  

1414 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Antivirus

    • Norton/Symantec
      665
    • McAfee
      115
    • AVG
      201
    • NOD32
      131
    • PC-Cilin
      52
    • Panda
      33
    • Kaspersky
      103
    • Other
      107
    • F-Prot
      7


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I think the opposite about McAfee VS8.

I don't like it as much as 7.  Granted 8 looks better but in VS8 we lost whitelisting of scripts, exclusions, scheduled scanning options, logging, ability to completely turn of alerts for true silent operation, and gained the security center(plug for software you don't own), a buggy activeX base, and the program is tied to an email address(not that big of a deal).

So while 7 wasn't pretty I think it was better.

i'm pretty sure v8 has logging..i've seen log files? I know you can schedule a scan. As for the rest, I couldn't honestly say. I haven't had issue with any crashes or any bugs.. and the only activex component i've noticed it wanting to install is if you try to manually update the program. i just canceled that and let it autoupdate itself.

i've tried mcafee versions prior to 8 and there was always a noticible slowdown on my computer with vshield running in the background. For the first time ever (for me), with v8, the virus protection running in the background doesn't make my pc slow down. I honestly can't notice a difference. No virus software has done that before.

I dunno .. i like v8. its light, works well and has no noticible impact on my systems performance. I also like the little virus alerts and notifications it pops up.. the little windows slide up out of the tray like the little msn messenger windows do. i hated all previous mcafee versions, but since they junked all their old code and went with their new subscription based code, this one has impressed me.

/edit.. just wanted to add, to each their own. everyone's pc runs things differently and everyone has different likes and dislikes, so everyone will have their own "best antivirus". i'm just talking about my own personal experiences here, not that one way is right or wrong :)

  • 0

McAfee VS 8 has no logging features, I defy you to show me where they are.

As for the scheduled scanning options, you can set a scheduled scan, what I'm saying is that the scheduled scan lost options. For instance you can't tell VS8 to attempt to clean-up first then quarentine or delete if clean-up isn't possible. It just runs. They took those options away.

But I run VS8 right now, it's fine I just want some of those options back. Why they decided to make it use activeX is beyond me, as I consider having activeX enabled is a risk in itself, and now even though I use mozilla I still have to allow internet explorer to use ActiveX and I hate that but it's a minor issue.

  • 0
yes that's right and very fast too; but it's not very known as norton. I use nod, it has a simple and a very advanced mode ;)

I am currently looking for a new anti virus software but my computer is not that fast and only has 256MB of ram so I need a anit virus program which won't be a resource hog so that's Norton out the window.

How is Nod32 on system resources and does it slow windows start up ?

cheers

  • 0
McAfee VS 8 has no logging features, I defy you to show me where they are.

i'll try my best when i get home. i'm sure i saw a log file that it made. it was a txt file.

i understand now what you meant about the scheduling stuff. i guess if you used that previously, it would suck to see it gone.

anywho .. i'll look into that log file thing when i get home tonite :)

  • 0
I thought NOD32 was the best virus scanner out right now by a long way.

exactly.. 25/3 VB100 record (the highest ever), compared to Symantec's 23/6.. not to mention the extreme speed (my whole 120gb HD takes about 10min to scan completely), low memory footprint (from 5 to 10mb), and very small definition updates (to get the whole program up to date, you need to download 1.5mb.. after that it automatically updates itself with 10-20Kb on an hourly basis)..

i was extremely surprised of NOD32's performance.. you really never notice its there, thoroughly scanning every file that enters memory.. on my PIII-700 / 240mb SDRAM PC-133 / GF4MX420 PCI / 120GB Seagate Barracuda 7,200 having NOD32 on is like leaving foobar2000 playing.. the performance hit isn't noticeable.. all the contrary to when i had Norton 2K2/2K3/2k4 installed, when it literally brought my machine to its knees with its bloatware protection..

Norton isn't bad, but NOD32 is better.. proven fact.. and N32 being completely stripped of useless bloatware, straight to the point, inobtrusive, while still having eye-candy for a GUI (:cool:), are just extra features..

i hate to be cliche and geeky, but NOD32 > * . :yes:

  • 0

I just started using Avast! Anit-Virus and so far I am very happy with it. It updates every 6 hours or so and is very small. It uses very little resources but is as powerfull as most of the big ones.

I switched from Norton because of the HUGE mess they made with the 2004 version.

http://www.avast.com

  • 0
exactly.. 25/3 VB100 record (the highest ever), compared to Symantec's 23/6.. not to mention the extreme speed (my whole 120gb HD takes about 10min to scan completely), low memory footprint (from 5 to 10mb), and very small definition updates (to get the whole program up to date, you need to download 1.5mb.. after that it automatically updates itself with 10-20Kb on an hourly basis)..

i was extremely surprised of NOD32's performance.. you really never notice its there, thoroughly scanning every file that enters memory.. on my PIII-700 / 240mb SDRAM PC-133 / GF4MX420 PCI / 120GB Seagate Barracuda 7,200 having NOD32 on is like leaving foobar2000 playing.. the performance hit isn't noticeable.. all the contrary to when i had Norton 2K2/2K3/2k4 installed, when it literally brought my machine to its knees with its bloatware protection..

Norton isn't bad, but NOD32 is better.. proven fact.. and N32 being completely stripped of useless bloatware, straight to the point, inobtrusive, while still having eye-candy for a GUI (:cool:), are just extra features..

i hate to be cliche and geeky, but NOD32 > * . :yes:

I agree NOD is GOOD. But i had a terrible experience with NOD32 therefore i ditched it and switched back to Symantec AntiVirus Corporate Edition.

Here's what happened to me, it was scanning my computer for viruses. Suddenly the virus notification pops out and displays several choices for me to deal with the virus.

Delete, quarantine and cancel (those standard stuff). Whatever i click, the virus notification box keeps appearing in an ENDLESS loop, rendering my computer useless. ENDLESS LOOP, even the buggiest Microsoft products doesn't do that.

I have to take the last resort and forcefully END TASK the process. Letting the virus loose. Restarted the computer and the infamous loop started again.

p/s Take note, NOD32 was at the latest product and virus definition.

I hate NAV 2003 as well. But Symantec Antivirus just does the job well. My University was having some software licensing agreement, bulk license. Students can get it at a cheaper rate. Actually it was nearly the same as getting the license for NAV 2003.

  • 0

@macodin.. just wanted to follow up to say you were right. I couldn't find any sort of logging. I know what I was thinking of now.. when I did a registry clean, I noticed some registry entries that were related to mcafee and logging. I confuzzled myself :)

  • 0
AVG because it's free and never had any problems with it at all, can't justify paying if this does the job personally.

Yeah, I used AVG for a couple of years, never ever had any problems at all. Only reason I don't use it anymore is my complimentary McAfee subscription with MSN Premium. Must admit though, I'm finding McAfee buggy as hell right now.

  • 0

I work with viruses and security frequently. I watched the development of an extremely malicious trojan called Netdevil, it gained the popularity of Subseven with the power of HDKP. It took Norton Antivirus 3 months to be able to detect it, Kaspersky found it in about a week. And norton STILL doesn't detect it when its compressed with UPX, it hardly detects ANY UPX'd viruses. Kaspersky on the other hand finds them all.

NetDevil is dead now, so no need to worry about it, but there are more malicious ones than that out there, and Norton is never able to see them. Remember that most trojans will be self-extracting compressed in some form, bound to an exe, and silent in the processes. They can sneak past firewalls, and can hide in the startup of the registry (bind to explorer.exe). You aren't safe without Kaspersky.

  • 0
I work with viruses and security frequently. I watched the development of an extremely malicious trojan called Netdevil, it gained the popularity of Subseven with the power of HDKP. It took Norton Antivirus 3 months to be able to detect it, Kaspersky found it in about a week. And norton STILL doesn't detect it when its compressed with UPX, it hardly detects ANY UPX'd viruses. Kaspersky on the other hand finds them all.

NetDevil is dead now, so no need to worry about it, but there are more malicious ones than that out there, and Norton is never able to see them. Remember that most trojans will be self-extracting compressed in some form, bound to an exe, and silent in the processes. They can sneak past firewalls, and can hide in the startup of the registry (bind to explorer.exe). You aren't safe without Kaspersky.

blimey.... well sold! you should do their commercials :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!