• 0

The Definitive "BEST ANTIVIRUS" thread


Best Antivirus  

1414 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Antivirus

    • Norton/Symantec
      665
    • McAfee
      115
    • AVG
      201
    • NOD32
      131
    • PC-Cilin
      52
    • Panda
      33
    • Kaspersky
      103
    • Other
      107
    • F-Prot
      7


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Been downloading like crazy for a long time, and yet to have caught a virus, except for the Blaster worm that almost everyone got.

umm hate to burst your bubble but if you had been up to date with your patches you would never have got MSBlast as the patch was available about 4-6 weeks before MSBlast was released "into the wild". :whistle:

Also No AV is just asking for trouble. With the power in todays computers you dont need to worry about running AV software as well because they are so powerful.

You might have been lucky the past few years and you might be lucky for a few more but one day a virus is gonna come along and kick yo ass :p

  • 0
IMO

"Best Anti-Virus Suite" = No Anti-Virus Suite

Keep your computer patched (AKA AutoPatcherXP :D ), don't download files from places you dont trust, keep the Windows Firewall on and you'll be fine. Been downloading like crazy for a long time, and yet to have caught a virus, except for the Blaster worm that almost everyone got. If by some freak chance you do get a prevalent virus, grab Stinger (Stand-Alone) from McAfee and it'll clean you system for free.

You're right. :happy:

  • 0

too all those saying no virus protection, you crazy? viruses can get in more ways that just downloading a movie from kazaa or something. i wouldn't exactly download virus.exe from kazaa or anything, but if my friend was sending me a word document from an infected computer, seems harmless enough at first, but i sure as hell wanna know if it is gonna be harmful.

  • 0
I haven't have the exact figure of other AV software . But i have tested PCCllin 2003 and at first the memory usuage seems so low that i can not believe it. At a closer inspection. PC Cillin uses 17 Mb of Ram in Total ( according to WinXP )

That 17 Mb is spread over 4 .exe files.

I am interested in how Macfee and Norton mem usuage. I have Norton 2003 @ home so i will test it later.

I am testing some now. Here are results from my XP box.

Symantec Antivirus 2004 - uses between 17.7MB and 24.9MB of RAM across several listed services.

Trend Internet Security/PCcillan 2004 - Uses less than 17MB of RAM; however, once I turned on email scanning it gobbled up another 30 MB. Can someone else confirm this?

McAfee Internet Security Suite 6 (includes McAfee VirusScan 8.0, McAfee Personal Firewall Plus 5., McAfee SpamKiller 5.0, McAfee Privacy Service 6.0) - this sucker is a memory hog. Each test I have done utilizes between 60 and 80MB of RAM.

McAfee VirusScan 8.0 - consistantly uses upper 30'sMB of RAM while running.

McAfee Enterprise Edition 7.1 - Always right around 22MB - 23MB of RAM used up.

Hope this helps! I didnt really notice a slow down with any AV scanner (I have 512MB ram anyways) and I am in the habbit of shutting down AV scanners if I am about to play a large game like Americas Army.

  • 0
I have Ad-Aware right now and I like it but im not sure if it will find any viruses. Im looking for an Antivirus program that's small yet offers frequent side updates with new virus definitions [something like ad-aware].

what should I use, I would really like some suggestions.

Grisoft AVG Anti-Virus 6 (free version) or 7 (paid version) or Kaspersky KAV 4.5 or F-Secure Anti-Virus are the popular three which are lite on resources, fast scans, 100% accurate and offer frequest updates. Good luck. Any one of the above will serve you well.

:)

  • 0

i'm trying a program called Freedom Antivirus by Zeroknowledge (lol, the name suits the company, j/k). I like it so far, only complaint I have is that it is a hog of system resources even with 512 mb of ram. Best part is that it was included with my internet connection (Telus Velocity ADSL now includes Freedom Antivirus, ad block, e-care and lots more) :whistle:

  • 0

Norton and McaFee just seem to be loaded with so many extras that i dont want. Norton 2004 kills my system preformance so i decided to try out AVG which was pretty good. For a free Antivirus software its great with low system resource. Due to a few issues i finaly decided to try Panda and it was suprised me to find it better then any other. Autoupdates itself with definitions scans are fast and system resources are probably the lowest ive seen other then AVG.

  • 0

I don't think the graph means much.

Norton's the most bundled Av prog

on the market - a magnificent marketing

coup started years ago. Anyone buying

a computer has a 50% chance of a NAV

installation - & ordinary folk are unlikely

to replace it. Nor update the data-base

(unless it's on auto) :laugh:

However, it is effective.

But, very resource hungry. It also

embeds itself so deeply in WN's reg you

need a restore point (or third-party equiv)

to take it out. In fact, I've read comments

by IT experts claiming they'd never install

any Symantec prog for this reason,

i.e. consequential complications.

I use Virus Bulletin (not woofy Checkmark)

as my 'yard-stick' & wouldn't go past Eset

NOD32. 'Ultra light', easy to uninstall, and

hugely effective at detection.

Awards? Again and again and again :D

Edited by Fourfingers
  • 0

Symantec Anti-virus because...

1) It came free with a software bundle I got for my last desktop.

2) I get it free (with updates) for as long as I am enrolled at RPI.

3) It has fixed every virus I ever had (3 times since the days of Windows 95, I beleive).

  • 0
i'm trying a program called Freedom Antivirus by Zeroknowledge (lol, the name suits the company, j/k). I like it so far, only complaint I have is that it is a hog of system resources even with 512 mb of ram. Best part is that it was included with my internet connection (Telus Velocity ADSL now includes Freedom Antivirus, ad block, e-care and lots more) :whistle:

well, that didn't last 5 days, LOL! Uses WAY to many system resorces so back to AVG. GO AVG!

  • 0

Symantec AntiVirus Corprate Edition v8.00

Best protection available. And comes with optional antivirus filters for Lotus/Outlook. I've been running it on my machines and haven't had a virus in ages. LiveUpdate, updates virus protections automattically and quickly. Also has Server-Client support. It runs two processes, Rtvscan for FileSystem Realtime protection and Defwatch. Most of the time rtvscan runs about 8Mb and Defwatch a little over 1Mb. Uses little resources and still offers great protection.

For some reason I could never could get Norton to work as well as their Corprate line of software, even though their both made by Symantec.

I used to use Kaspersky but after 4.0 I thought that it kind of went down hill. Used too many resources for me. They might have improved it though, because Kaspersky is a nice program also. But like I said, I haven't tried it in awhile though.

My 2 cents.

obscure detour

  • 0

I switched to McAfee ViruScan Enterprise 7.1 after running NAV exclusively for over 7 years...I was tired of it acting like a virus itself, missing every trojan that came it's way, soaking up massive resources at will & trying to "phone home".

Besides, the McAfee updates don't end after a year & I can un-install it without doing a complete re-format. :woot:

Before I settled on McAfee, I tried AVG Pro, Kapersky, Bit-Defender, Panda Titatium and they all seemed a little weak and a few were buggy and acted strangely...IMHO.

I can't believe people (aka sheeple) still use Norton's bloat-ware...and don't believe the screenshot above, it's obviously a doctored pic sent in by Symantec's PR people! LMAO

BTW: McAfee found 3 trojans in a temp directory that Symantec Corp. & AVG Pro totally missed! :yes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!