• 0

The Definitive "BEST ANTIVIRUS" thread


Best Antivirus  

1414 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Antivirus

    • Norton/Symantec
      665
    • McAfee
      115
    • AVG
      201
    • NOD32
      131
    • PC-Cilin
      52
    • Panda
      33
    • Kaspersky
      103
    • Other
      107
    • F-Prot
      7


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I use F-Prot Antivirus.

I have tried Norton Antivirus and kept it on my PC for over an year long (without reinstalling) - it worked fine, though it seemed to slow down the computer at times + it had a preety "heavy" interface.

F-prot is simple and it features all the basic (and actually needed) options. It has a scanning tool to check your drives, a real-time protector to detect any threats in real time, a scheduler to program tasks like drives scanning or online updates + the interface is not "heavy" on graphics an all kinds of visual effects. I also heard that it has one of the largest virus databases of all antivirus softwares.

quite what you need i suppose .... :shifty:

  • 0
just got symantec antivirus corporate v9.0.0.338, the scanning is much faster compare to v8. i guess symantec still make the best antivirus. :)

How does CPU usage and memory usage compare to Old version?

And What is the difference between Exchange plug in and The pop3 / imap plug in?

Any interface improvement?

  • 0
just got symantec antivirus corporate v9.0.0.338, the scanning is much faster compare to v8. i guess symantec still make the best antivirus. :)

I'm on SAV CE 8.1 at the moment, but now that 9.x is out I might use my Gold maintenance to upgrade for free.

Any obvious benefits like better interface etc etc??

  • 0
How does CPU usage and memory usage compare to Old version?

And What is the difference between Exchange plug in and The pop3 / imap plug in?

Any interface improvement?

the memory and cpu usage is around the same.... i dont feel any different on my machine. about the email plugins i'm not sure myself but this version the email scanning does work with thunderbird.

  • 0

Well, well...NAV Pro blows it again!!! :angry:

My home machines had been upgraded to McAfee Enterprise VirusScan & Symantec Corp., but one of my computers in my work office was still running NAV Pro & NPF 2003.

With up-to-date NAV virus definitions, I picked up an ActiveX Trojan and NAV won't even detect even when I tell the fat, bloated POS where to look!

Trust me, if you're one of the sheeple blindly following Norton products, your time is coming!!! :devil:

BTW, I did a test with McAfee Enterprise VirusScan & Symantec Corp. installations on the same webpage that attack my NAV Pro system and Symantec Corp. didn't detect it either!

Only McAfee Enterprise VirusScan 7.1 with up-to-date definitions caught it, and stopped it dead in it's tracks...

:whistle:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
    • Yes, I actually glossed over the Linux part from the OP. You could always go for a 9070 XT and if you really want to play Ray Traced games in the future, GeForce Now is pretty damn good on Linux https://www.neowin.net/news/nvidias-native-geforce-now-app-for-linux-bridges-the-gaming-gap-hands-on/
    • One reason it might be running hotter is dust build up within the cooling or perhaps the paste has dried out. You could always try repasting your old GPU and cleaning the cooler. Your experience in Linux will be much better with an AMD GPU; the performance in gaming is much closer to Windows than nVidia would be. I personally think on Windows, AMD drivers are junk.
    • I reviewed it back in March, but I didn't have a 5070 at the time https://www.neowin.net/reviews/amd-rx-9070-review-vs-rtx-5070-4070-and-rx-9070-xt-7800-xt--just-good-enough/ When I reviewed the 9070 I did have a 5070 to compare it against, so the scores are there for the 9070 XT. it outperforms the 5070 in raster, and is barely neck and neck in Ray Tracing. So it's better than a 5070 in everything but Ray Tracing where it is neck and neck, or just under. To be honest, the uplift from 3080 when it was new to the 9070 XT is not as great a step up. If you can find a used 4080 Super for around the same money, you would probably be better off, but if you only want to buy new then the 16GB 9070 XT is the best value for money in its category.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!