Chaoserver Posted March 23, 2005 Share Posted March 23, 2005 Damn which lan was this? And tell me when you next go to one, sounds fun. 585657585[/snapback] PDXLAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spyker Posted March 23, 2005 Share Posted March 23, 2005 ****en crappy max 1280x1024 res on crappy sony CRT :angry:*punches monitor* 585657236[/snapback] thought the same thing, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islanq Posted March 23, 2005 Author Share Posted March 23, 2005 *punches everyone in the face just for fun* :ninja: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toastyone Posted March 23, 2005 Share Posted March 23, 2005 PDXLAN 585657665[/snapback] :no: poor me and the east coast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blik Posted March 23, 2005 Share Posted March 23, 2005 Cmon... Cmon!!!! Benches ASAP!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islanq Posted March 23, 2005 Author Share Posted March 23, 2005 My new benchies are in my sig. My old setup got around 13K in 3Dmark03 and around 5,500 in 3Dmark05. Then again that is mainly due to the graphics card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fortun2kk Posted March 23, 2005 Share Posted March 23, 2005 ISLANQ how much was all : AMD 3500+ @ 2.75GHz (275x10) DFi nF4 LanParty nF4 Ultra-D 1GB OCZ VX PC3200 @ 550MHz 2-2-2-5 X850XT @ 560/590 Seagate 120GB (x2) raid 0 Western Digital 200GB NEC ND-3500A 16x ? Dual Layer (x2) Antec NeoPower 480 Lian Li PC-65B Custom Danger Den (CPU + GPU) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valerus Posted March 23, 2005 Share Posted March 23, 2005 Nice hardware. :santa: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hypoxiaicon Posted March 23, 2005 Share Posted March 23, 2005 AMD need a faster CPU. The 3500+ Winchesters are not fast enough, We need a faster Winchester Core CPU, or Better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islanq Posted March 23, 2005 Author Share Posted March 23, 2005 ISLANQhow much was all : AMD 3500+ @ 2.75GHz (275x10) DFi nF4 LanParty nF4 Ultra-D 1GB OCZ VX PC3200 @ 550MHz 2-2-2-5 X850XT @ 560/590 Seagate 120GB (x2) raid 0 Western Digital 200GB NEC ND-3500A 16x ? Dual Layer (x2) Antec NeoPower 480 Lian Li PC-65B Custom Danger Den (CPU + GPU) 585660555[/snapback] right around $2,100 + $4XX for liquid,. But I got my liquid for free so yeah;)) @Hypoxiaicon - I beat every FX-55 in the benchmarking compitition except for one @ 3.1GHz;)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argote Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 3.1GHZ in an Athlon 64 is sick fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wakeman214 Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 c'mon guys... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A10 Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 Oh how I love it when people make fun of people with down syndrome talk about mean, insensitive and just plain wrong. If it where up to me the word retarded would be banned from the english language gets thrown around alot it's mental or physical retardation not retarded you jerks. Use another word if you want to make fun of somebody who is dumb. I'm itching to report that post to get that image removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islanq Posted March 24, 2005 Author Share Posted March 24, 2005 c'mon guys... 585662610[/snapback] No one is arguing you lamer... I can see your Neowin future will be short lived with crappy post like this? Why did you even post that, no one is fighting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 c'mon guys... 585662610[/snapback] that has nothing to do with anything wtf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argote Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 c'mon guys... 585662610[/snapback] being a suscriber doesn't mean you can go trolling about your post is just out of place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
se7en.hu Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 c'mon guys... 585662610[/snapback] LOL no one was even argueing :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottFern Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 Alright then. Anyway, to change the subject back to high ocing A64s, the new venice core has a lot of potential and one guy who got a hold of a 3800+ venice clocked it to 3.2Ghz on air. Not to shabby so hopefully this new core will prove to be a worthy upgrade over the winnies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lnmnky Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 ^ is it still 939? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islanq Posted March 24, 2005 Author Share Posted March 24, 2005 yeah, i'm pretty sure venice will be 939. Just like dual core for intel will be s775 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottFern Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 Yup, the venice will be S939 and only 2 Mobo manufacturers will require a bios update the rest should be fine as is. I can't wait to jump on a 3800+ or 4000+ venice!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strekship Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 AMD need a faster CPU.The 3500+ Winchesters are not fast enough, We need a faster Winchester Core CPU, or Better. 585660617[/snapback] What do you mean? They already beat out intels top models, what more do you want? I do think that it would be cool so see a 3.7ghz AMD64. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 What do you mean? They already beat out intels top models, what more do you want? I do think that it would be cool so see a 3.7ghz AMD64. 585668843[/snapback] did you see THG lately? they did a CPU benchmark of pretty much all CPU's ever created by intel & AMD.. it pains me to admit it but Intel owned on nearly every game benchmark and the ones they didnt they came 2nd or 3rd only by AMD's FX and 4000+ (I'm talking even the 3.2GHz P4's) :unsure: something to think about really.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+dave164 Subscriber¹ Posted March 25, 2005 Subscriber¹ Share Posted March 25, 2005 And the source for this is.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love_Hate Posted March 25, 2005 Share Posted March 25, 2005 islanq... your sig is still wrong, mobo = memory :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts