Lakers vs. Kings Game 6 Rigged


Recommended Posts

you dont understand that went both ways? you dont think webber fouled horry? would you have liked for them to have called that and webber fouled out? no you wouldnt have.

stop ***** about the refs you sound like Mark Cuban. get on here and cry when they win about the calls i would like to see that.

Come on. The whole series the Kings have been getting the calls. I mean look at last game, Shaq goes to the line one time in the whole game? That just doesn't happen, whether it is Shaq or not. A center on any team will get to the line more than one time in a game.

Kings fans need to calm down. They have gotten all the calls up until this game and no game it officiated perfectly.

There is a game seven and in my opinion the two best teams in the league are playing in it.

Originally posted by spartacus2k1

Come on. The whole series the Kings have been getting the calls. I mean look at last game, Shaq goes to the line one time in the whole game? That just doesn't happen, whether it is Shaq or not. A center on any team will get to the line more than one time in a game.

Kings fans need to calm down. They have gotten all the calls up until this game and no game it officiated perfectly.

There is a game seven and in my opinion the two best teams in the league are playing in it.

so that's a good enough reason to ignore an elbow to the face that caused blood loss? I think not... And worried about Shaq not going to the line?!? come on! if anything everyone from the opposing team should be at the line at least 2 times per player. Shaq is almost never called for 3 second violations nor is he almost ever called for offensive fouls, which he commits a lot...

And the NJ Nets are better than the Lakers and the Kings.

Originally posted by spartacus2k1

Come on. The whole series the Kings have been getting the calls. I mean look at last game, Shaq goes to the line one time in the whole game? That just doesn't happen, whether it is Shaq or not. A center on any team will get to the line more than one time in a game.

Kings fans need to calm down. They have gotten all the calls up until this game and no game it officiated perfectly.

There is a game seven and in my opinion the two best teams in the league are playing in it.

I am definitely not a Kings' fan, but I am a Sixers fan. I do believe that the Kings were robbed tonight because of bad calls especially in the end. Shaq only deserves to have one freethrow because most of the other games he charges into people before he makes his shot. More offensive calls should be called on him more then anything because he causes most of those fouls and not the person defending him.

Originally posted by kasper

well you totaly ignored what i said!

you really think Kobe should have been called for that?

i dont think he would have in any game ever. i hope you dont think he ment to do it? but i guess you think bibby wasnt holding him on that play?

Of course he should be called for that. You can't just elbow someone in the face. In my book elbowing someone in basketball right in their face is a foul. Bibby's nose was bleeding so obviously he was hit. Also Bibby was guarding behind him with his hands out and was not holding him.

Originally posted by kasper

well you totaly ignored what i said!

you really think Kobe should have been called for that?

i dont think he would have in any game ever. i hope you dont think he ment to do it? but i guess you think bibby wasnt holding him on that play?

i don't believe so, but even so they were both locking with each other, there was no reason to drive the elbow up into Bibby's face to get free. And if you are telling me that was holding, why wasn't it called? Because that Ref is a moron, like most refs for the NBA anymore. If you are hit in the face, that is an automatic foul...then there's the blood factor...that's a foul....both of them may have been in the wrong (kobe more than Bibby), but either way a call was missed that could have changed the game

So what you are saying hareball82 is that the Lakers, mostly Shaq, foul all the time and the Kings never foul or flop? Every call the Kings get against them they cry, even when the replay shows the foul. Be realistic. I am not saying that the Lakers don't foul and don't get called for fouling, but it works both ways. Kings didn't get called for everything this game, the last three games and probably won't get called on Sunday either.

I think the Kings have a great squad and I believe they honestly deserve to move on more than the Lakers. They just want it more. However, don't complain about the calls. It works both ways and almost the entire series the Kings have been getting the calls in their favor.

As far as the Nets, they are good - but there isn't a team in the east that can compete with the west coast teams.

This is going to cause arguments but here's my input:

Bad calls are going to happen, but personally I don't think the ref made any mistake in not making that call. It was replayed several times. Sure, he was knocked with the elbow, but it was Bibby's own fault. If he didn't stiff arm, Kobe could've gone past him without making that gesture.

I don't know how many of you that posted actually plays basketball, but I do. I played for varsity high school basketball and private basketball club. And if anything, I can tell you in those important time in games, everything is arguable.

And for those that criticize Shaq: I think you guys should actually go out and play some basketball. I would like to see how well you can "back into people" and make that hook or turn around shot. It may look easy, but it's not. Especially with a person in your face, often times more than one. Besides all that, can you imagine yourself 300 some pounds and run up and down the court?

Originally posted by nomis_nehc

This is going to cause arguments but here's my input:

Bad calls are going to happen, but personally I don't think the ref made any mistake in not making that call. It was replayed several times. Sure, he was knocked with the elbow, but it was Bibby's own fault. If he didn't stiff arm, Kobe could've gone past him without making that gesture.

I don't know how many of you that posted actually plays basketball, but I do. I played for varsity high school basketball and private basketball club. And if anything, I can tell you in those important time in games, everything is arguable.

And for those that criticize Shaq: I think you guys should actually go out and play some basketball. I would like to see how well you can "back into people" and make that hook or turn around shot. It may look easy, but it's not. Especially with a person in your face, often times more than one. Besides all that, can you imagine yourself 300 some pounds and run up and down the court?

I do play basketball, and that is by far the lamest way to win a game - to rely on one person, the center to get your points. It doesn't require near as much as talent as say a guard has. There are 5 per team on the floor for a reason. And I'm 260lbs and don't have a problem running full court.

I said it before but: Kobe is way too cocky and all Shaq does is hang under the basket waiting for Kobe or Rick Fox to give him the ball for the dunk. - And that's just lame.

I am a Lakers fan and in game 6 the calls definitely went the Lakers way. However, in game 5 they went the Kings way enough to decide the outcome in favor of the Kings.

I have my own theory. The NBA and NBC want 7 games played, and the refs are in on it. It's all about the money. I personally would just like to see the games called consistently so we could really see who was the best. The players can't adjust there game to the calling because its different from game to game and even minute to minute.

BTW, I think "Floppy" Divac brought some of that on himself. Did you see in game 5 where he caught Sumaki Walkers arm and pulled it up into his face and got the call? He's definitelly started to lose credibility with the refs, and thats of his own doing.

Originally posted by jmole

Of course he should be called for that. You can't just elbow someone in the face. In my book elbowing someone in basketball right in their face is a foul. Bibby's nose was bleeding so obviously he was hit. Also Bibby was guarding behind him with his hands out and was not holding him.

guys!!! everyone!!! guess what?? refs wont call things at the end of games!!! OMG really???

what is this new? you are people joking? THEY DO NOT WANT TO PICK WHO WINS!

look game 5 a few seconds left lakers down, kobe gets the ball trys a turn around jumper... who wants to tell me you didnt see his shirt get pulled? you want the refs to call that? no! i dont! they call that foul Kobe hits 2 free throws where would you kings fans be now?

its the way the NBA works, this just didnt all start later night. but you guys are acting that way.

whos wants to see Jordan get called for that push off when he nailed that jumper to beat the Jazz a few years ago?

oh and umm YES bibby was hooking Kobe, and Kobe did the right thing in trying the swim move... he did not mean to hit him. that stuff just happens. look at Dirk that boy gets hit int he face every game.

Originally posted by Wodin

I am a Lakers fan and in game 6 the calls definitely went the Lakers way. However, in game 5 they went the Kings way enough to decide the outcome in favor of the Kings.

I have my own theory. The NBA and NBC want 7 games played, and the refs are in on it. It's all about the money. I personally would just like to see the games called consistently so we could really see who was the best. The players can't adjust there game to the calling because its different from game to game and even minute to minute.

BTW, I think "Floppy" Divac brought some of that on himself. Did you see in game 5 where he caught Sumaki Walkers arm and pulled it up into his face and got the call? He's definitelly started to lose credibility with the refs, and thats of his own doing.

dood! your a moron! even if you "theory" is right... what in the world makes you think the NBA wants to do anything for NBC? they are leaving them!

so when does this "theory" start? as soon as the playoffs start? or do they do it in other big games to keep the score close??

hmm, you know if that was the truth we would know about it by now, b/c that would mean that every ref is in on it and it would have been leaked by now.

a STAR and someone a ref respects in big games will always get the benefit of the call. it will be like that till the game is refed by robots.

Originally posted by kasper

guys!!! everyone!!! guess what?? refs wont call things at the end of games!!! OMG really???

what is this new? you are people joking? THEY DO NOT WANT TO PICK WHO WINS!

look game 5 a few seconds left lakers down, kobe gets the ball trys a turn around jumper... who wants to tell me you didnt see his shirt get pulled? you want the refs to call that? no! i dont! they call that foul Kobe hits 2 free throws where would you kings fans be now?

its the way the NBA works, this just didnt all start later night. but you guys are acting that way.

whos wants to see Jordan get called for that push off when he nailed that jumper to beat the Jazz a few years ago?

oh and umm YES bibby was hooking Kobe, and Kobe did the right thing in trying the swim move... he did not mean to hit him. that stuff just happens. look at Dirk that boy gets hit int he face every game.

what do you mean they don't call fouls at the end of the game. that is such bs.... the lakers got so many foul shots near the game's end.. and what's this about not picking who wins? essentially, they are when they make bad calls and miss calls...

i agree.....the kings should have won the game and advance to the finals......................can't the rules in basketball change and make it similar to those in NHL for example were the refs can revien the plays that are recorder and then make a call,,..or change a call...?

My Two Cents....

I'm about the biggest Lakers fan you'll meet on Neowin. And I have to tell you, that every call that was made during this game was made properly. Here's why.

The call I've read a lot of you so called King's fans out there posting about is the one where Mike Bibby got knocked in the nose by Kobe. If you take a look at that play, the reason the refs didn't call this foul on Kobe, is because before he even hit Bibby, Bibby was holding him around the waste! You can't hang onto a player and expect them not to throw their elbows around trying to get out of it.

And here we have Mr. Floparoo himself, Vlade "Flopapalooza" Divac, who almost gets every call for him because he CAN ACT. That's the only thing I can give the guy. Well, I take that back. He's a good perimiter shooter for a big guy. But, when it comes to defense, his whole defense is an act.

On the other side of the fence, we have Chris Webber, who (if you pay attention) after every "bad" call against him, he looks like he's about to CRY! My GOD! He's a grown man for gods sake! He's even got TYRA BANKS for god's sake! Come on man? Why cry about a call you're not going to be able to change?

And then we have Mr. Ugly himself, Doug Christie. My god, is he the ugliest guy you've ever seen in your life? That's about all I have to say about him.

Mike Bibby is their best player. He's got the moves, and the shot to put up some points. But, again, Chris Webber and Bibby can't win the game for the Kings like Shaq and Kobe can for the Lakers. I mean COME ON! We all know who's going to win on Sunday. We all know the Lakers WILL be the winners of the Western Conference.

And about Shaq. Yes, he's a BIG man. Over 300 lbs, and can still move with the best of them. And so what? So he dunks to hit points. So he backs the guy in and hits a hook shot? So WHAT? These are players that are supposed to stop that hook shot, or get in the way of Shaq when he goes for a dunk. He's totally unstoppable. He won't be stopped by anyone from the Kings, nor anyone from the Nets when they kick their ass too.

And the Final Word:

Lakers ROCK, and they WILL be the NBA Champions again!

3 'PEAT BAAAAAABAY!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!