Lakers vs. Kings Game 6 Rigged


Recommended Posts

In regards to the last play of Game 5, that was not a foul... Even Phil said so after the game, its on ESPN somewhere if you want me to post a link. As for the end of game 6 that definately was a foul by Kobe, I mean he freaking elbowed Bibby in the face, all Bibby did was stand his ground and he basically got run over by Kobe. I do believe the game needs a reply system so the refs dont make these mistakes that quite frankly cost Sac that game

doug might be ugly,....but is has the best defense..............^^..........................shaq is not that nice looking either....................the team is not only based on Bibby and webber.......................if any of those players are not on the team, then it would be the Kings that we know off.............everybody is as important.............

This is worst than when Lakers play Portland a couple years back. Blaming the refs on bad calls are one thing but saying they determined the outcome is way off. There are too many variables involve that decide the outcome like shooting percentage, rebounding, defense, free throw percentage, you get the picture. What you are saying that bad calls by the ref can alone decide the game? There is nothing the players can do because the outcome of the game is already decided. I guess that when someone really wants a team to win logic goes out of the window.

Originally posted by Wildcard

In regards to the last play of Game 5, that was not a foul... Even Phil said so after the game, its on ESPN somewhere if you want me to post a link. As for the end of game 6 that definately was a foul by Kobe, I mean he freaking elbowed Bibby in the face, all Bibby did was stand his ground and he basically got run over by Kobe. I do believe the game needs a reply system so the refs dont make these mistakes that quite frankly cost Sac that game

so pulling someone is not a foul? sense win? remember i said they shouldnt have called it.

i dont understand why yall just dont see thats how things are... home team always gets more calls. there is a around for that they are at home and the refs are humen.

and by the end of the game i dont mean the 4th or even with 2min left i meant at the END of the game. the last play or the last plays that will decide who wins. the refs have NEVER called fouls there and they never will unless its a really bad foul.

cmon, nobody can say that the officiating has been par, but you know what, at least we see a competitive series involving the lakers (I am a clippers fan by the way, so I don't get to see many competitive games :D ), floppy divac is the only player who can deal with shaq, if he can play like he did early in the series and quit worrying about trying to get shaq to commit offensive fouls and actually play some D, that will better the sac chances, but if bibby/webber/turk or christie can't put points on the board, the lakers will own them, then go against the nets and sweep them

but then again, I wanted to see Lakers v. Celtics, hehe, next yr the clips will take it all :D

Yeah I think the Kings got screwed. Bibby was holding onto Kobe after he got hit in the nose. If you were falling flat on your back, you'd try to find something to grab onto too. Then were was that technical on Divac toward the end....should have been nothing less then a double technical. Divac and the other guy were both going at it.

As far as whining after bad calls...Kobe is the best at it. EVERY call, he's jawin at the ref. Thinks he's MJ or something....GO BACK TO SCHOOL KID!! And Shaq....the ONLY reason he is that good is because he is 7 ft 300 pounds. If he was 6ft 5 at 225, he wouldn't be playing basketball anywhere. All the crap shots he throws up. Come on...everytime he does his move, he either travels, or commits the charge. Course refs don't call traveling in the NBA. Vlade doesn't need to act...he'll get run over all the same.

The thing that irked me the most....on EVERY one of Shaq's freethrows, he crossed the line before the ball hits the rim. YOU CAN'T DO THAT!!! If he wasn't practically falling over himself shooting freethrows, he wouldn't be making any.

Thats what I can't stand about the NBA. Half of everything doesn't get called. If you took any NBA team against a college team with college refs, I'd take the college team. Course it would have to be a Duke, Kansas or Maryland. Pit any NBA team with college refs against any of those three college team, and the college team wins. The NBA guys would be travelling, 3 second calls...lane violations...etc.

I'm convinced there are only two real Laker fans out there...Diane Cannon and Jack Nicholas (and i kinda think they go just to be seen)....the rest jump on and off the bandwagon more than Dallas Cowboy fans.

lmao.. deal with Shaq? i have never been a Shaq fan but i am not stupid. there is something really wrong with him, he doesnt seem like the same player. i never seen him get so few dunks. maybe this is the day i was looking for! the day shaq starts to decline. b/c i know thats the only chance my team (or any other team for that matter) has a chance.

have you guys ever tried sports betting? particularly the nba..

try it..just put down a few dollars on a game..

you'll start to think that these nba games are fixed...the odds are almost always accurate, and it just takes one wrong choice to lose a lot of money...people make a living out of gamblin on these nba games, so someone's always gonna lose and if these big time gamblers can do anything about it, they'll almost always be on the winning end...

just try it..then you'll begin to scrutinize for real..

do i think kobe intentionally smack bibby? no..do i think the refs should have called it? no...that wouldn't be the deciding call on who wins or loses..IF these games are fixed, the refs would be making calls early, that would hurt the team (that's predetermined to lose) down the stretch (ie. bad calls that fouled out both divac and pollard)..that's how they don't make it obvious..

and it could be the players too..not just the refs...pierce and walker? how can they not shoot the ball (barely) in the 4th!!?? granted NJ played good defense..but pierce and walker can definitely put up more than 3-4 shots in a quarter..no matter how good the defense, they're that good..but they didn't

my friend who gambles a lot said "if you don't gamble, you'll never realize how fixed these games are"

Originally posted by kasper

you either cant see or are a liar, you pick.

before the play even started biddy was grabbing him, might i also add

AS HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN!

Kinda hard to chose between those two options since what I said was true. Now if you really know basketball, you'll know that players hold, grab, touch,etc each other. Bibby didn't grab Kobe until he got KOd. His arm was touching Kobe, but he wasn't grabbing. Big diff there bud. He started actually grabbing him when he went down. I don't think Kobe nailed him on purpose, but it should have been a foul. If a player starts bleeding, ya know he got fouled. Especially in the face area.

Originally posted by superfula

Kinda hard to chose between those two options since what I said was true. Now if you really know basketball, you'll know that players hold, grab, touch,etc each other. Bibby didn't grab Kobe until he got KOd. His arm was touching Kobe, but he wasn't grabbing. Big diff there bud. He started actually grabbing him when he went down. I don't think Kobe nailed him on purpose, but it should have been a foul. If a player starts bleeding, ya know he got fouled. Especially in the face area.

your right about that, bibby didn't GRAB kobe until the accidental elbow hit bibby in the nose, but he did have him hooked before the play began up til the elbow hit bibby in the face, now according to the rulebooks, that would be a foul

Nah he wasn't hooking him at all. Hooking almost always occurs when the offensive guy with the ball has his back to the defender in the low post, and uses his arm to "hook" the defensive guy, which basically pushes the defensive guy out of the way so the offensive guy can get by him

And have you watched the NBA? If they started calling hooking a foul, guys would be fouling out left and right. As it stands in the "NBA rulebook"...hooking is not a foul...not one that is called anyway.

Originally posted by superfula

Nah he wasn't hooking him at all. Hooking almost always occurs when the offensive guy with the ball has his back to the defender in the low post, and uses his arm to "hook" the defensive guy, which basically pushes the defensive guy out of the way so the offensive guy can get by him

And have you watched the NBA? If they started calling hooking a foul, guys would be fouling out left and right. As it stands in the "NBA rulebook"...hooking is not a foul...not one that is called anyway.

and have you been watching this series? since when have the refs really emphasized the 3 sec rule in the paint this postseason?

Originally posted by kasper

we would know! this is never talked about!

if they were really fixed it would be leaked and people would talk about it all the time.

well kasper, sometimes you wouldn't know..if your circle of friends did not talk about it, it doesn't mean everyone else did not...the gambling business is kept on the DL..and THEY talk about it ALL THE TIME...

i'm just sayin, don't be ignorant to the fact that these nba games MIGHT be fixed...

watch the players..watch the refs..watch every shot taken, watch every pass..watch every call...just watch

and don't gamble :) no matter how tempting..

Originally posted by whipper25

well kasper, sometimes you wouldn't know..if your circle of friends did not talk about it, it doesn't mean everyone else did not...the gambling business is kept on the DL..and THEY talk about it ALL THE TIME...

i'm just sayin, don't be ignorant to the fact that these nba games MIGHT be fixed...

watch the players..watch the refs..watch every shot taken, watch every pass..watch every call...just watch

and don't gamble :) no matter how tempting..

no, i just mean it would be talked about everywhere sports talk radio for one..

uhh... wtf, I don't know where some of you learned how to play basketball or what kind of rule book you are referring to...

but grabbing, holding, hooking and the bunch is a foul. the only times the refs are lax on those calls are when the players are in the paint, boxing out for the rebound. (Dennis R was good at holding ;)) And putting an bent arm on a offensive player that's backing in is not a foul.

all the rest... FOUL!

at least in these games. of course, if you're playing street ball or whatever, then it's rules by the street.

Originally posted by nomis_nehc

uhh... wtf, I don't know where some of you learned how to play basketball or what kind of rule book you are referring to...

but grabbing, holding, hooking and the bunch is a foul. the only times the refs are lax on those calls are when the players are in the paint, boxing out for the rebound. (Dennis R was good at holding ;)) And putting an bent arm on a offensive player that's backing in is not a foul.

all the rest... FOUL!

at least in these games. of course, if you're playing street ball or whatever, then it's rules by the street.

Apparently you don't watch the NBA very much.

EDIT: Just stumbled upon this

http://espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2002/column...id/1389713.html

It's not rigged, Phil Jackson is a very respected coach, he doesn't have to do that to win. The Lakers in the NBA are like the Red Wings in NHL and the Yankees in MLB. They got tons of cash, so they got the best players and the best coaches of all time. We have to live with that.

And for whoever said about how if the Lakers are just going to give it to Shaq all game, why wouldn't they? If you pay a guy tons of money to do what he's doing and it works, WHY NOT DO IT. That's retarded, it's like here we can score on you but we won't, what are you an idiot? Think about what you say first and you won't make yourself seem like a moron.

My two cents :p.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!