DEFINITIVE: Which Linux Distro? (poll)

By markwolfe
in Linux

 Share

Which Linux Distro do you prefer?  

773 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Linux Distro do you prefer?

    • Slackware (or derivatives)
      33
    • Debian
      56
    • SUSE Linux (or derivatives)
      99
    • Fedora Core (or Redhat, or RHEL)
      120
    • Gentoo (or derivatives)
      86
    • Ubuntu
      273
    • Other Debian Derivative (Mepis, Kanotix, etc)
      25
    • Arch
      19
    • Linspire
      22
    • Mandriva
      40

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

DjmUK

Posted
Posted
I just want to know why Fedora/Mandrake/SuSe need 3+ CDs, while Gentoo only needs 2, and Ubuntu only needs 1? Does it mean that Gentoo/Ubuntu needs more work (read installation of software) to get it up and running properly? or does Gentoo/Ubuntu just not come with a lot of redundant stuff?

585678428[/snapback]

Fedora / Mandrake / SuSe has a LOT of extra applications that desktop users would like. Fedora Core 3 takes 6.7GB to install 'Everything'.

Gentoo isn't really a Desktop system, it doesn't have a Graphical User Interface as default, and it only installs the sheer necessities.

All Linux distros can install all Linux apps, but not everyone wants to install all the 'extras' which is great for servers who want to run Gentoo without a pretty interface and redundant software that they will never use, and this gives the user complete control over 'what to' and 'what not' to install.

P.S.

Fedora Core 3 & Gentoo 2005.0 rocks!

Grand Master

rezza Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Close, I guess- Ubuntu's pretty similar to Gentoo (haven't worked extensively with either, feel free to correct me there), but there's one *huge* difference-- Ubuntu is built for you.

There's a serious, serious speed difference in Gentoo when you make the kernel and programs yourself with optemisation versus downloading the prepackaged bins or just compiling with no optomizing.

585656596[/snapback]

Oh, really? Have your run benchmarks to measure this "serious, serious" speed difference? I believe you'll find that the speed increases are marginal at best, and some popular compile optimisations used by many gentoo users (for instance -O3 in your CFLAGS) can sometimes slow down software rather than speed it up. I think you'll find it difficult to provide links to solid evidence which demonstrates a practical, noticable jump in speed when using hardware-specific optimisations.

Don't get me wrong, I am a huge gentoo supporter, and have used it pretty much exclusively as my main OS for a couple of years now, and I think it is still the best system for me to use (portage is just so ridiculously powerful when you learn all the ins and outs of the additional portage tools available), but I do honestly believe that the oft-touted "speed advantages" that gentoo has over other distros are pretty much non-existant in practice. Any reasonably recent, well-configured and setup linux system will run fast.

Gentoo is powerful for the flexibility it brings to the table more than anything else, imho.

Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted

I've always been a Fedora fan, but I decided to download and play around with Ubuntu 5.04 earlier today and all I can say is wow... very nicely done. Of course I've only used it for about three hours now, but from what I can tell so far, it is a much better distro then Fedora.

Grand Master

Malisk

Posted
Posted

Debian / Other Debian-based...

More precisely: MEPIS.

Holds similar quality as Ubuntu, but this distro was from the scratch designed for KDE, not Gnome.

Currently, the popularity ranking (based on distro page visits) on Distrowatch.com shows:

1. Ubuntu

2. Mandrake

3. Fedora

4. MEPIS

5. SUSE

6. Debian

7. Knoppix

... which speaks a bit of its popularity and curiosity it's raising. :)

I'm therefore a bit surprised that it's not even a choice here. :(

Grand Master

markwolfe Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
Currently, the popularity ranking (based on distro page visits) on Distrowatch.com shows:

1. Ubuntu

2. Mandrake

3. Fedora

4. MEPIS

5. SUSE

6. Debian

7. Knoppix

... which speaks a bit of its popularity and curiosity it's raising. :)

I'm therefore a bit surprised that it's not even a choice here.  :(

585722483[/snapback]

Well, our installed base here at Neowin seems to be different than the general population who visits Distrowatch.

Our order (as of today) is

1. Fedora

2. Gentoo

3. SUSE

4. Ubuntu

5. Mandrake

While Mepis may be a great Debian-based distro, if we add the "Other Debian" + the "Other - Please specify" categories up, and assume that they all were Mepis, it still would not add up any higher than Ubuntu (which dominates the Debian varieties here).

But, in the Open Source world, things change very quickly. Ubuntu has rocketed into the spotlight from a new distro freshly created. At the end of the year, we will have the ability to remove a distro or two and add in whatever new popular items have come up.

Grand Master

markwolfe Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
is there a linux distro out there that is able to fully "emulate" windows xp?

i'm looking for something that would be able to run almost all windows applications, along with autodetect hardware and install, but with none of the hassles of windows.

585733665[/snapback]

I think that is called Windows.

You cannot jump into Linux expecting it to be just like Windows and have any sort of expectation of success.

In Windows, you are a user. In Linux, you must learn to be an administrator. It is extra work to get to learn to manage your system, but once that is done, you will find that Linux runs much more reliably and problem-free than Windows.

But you cannot start with a requirement that it runs Windows applications.

Grand Master

msg43

Posted
Posted
Why is Ubuntu so popular?  What does it have that others don't?

585748123[/snapback]

It's Simple

It everything a noob or a basic *nix user wants

it like fedora 3 w/out the bs (mp3,etc...) and it has a bunch of nifty features that are made see able

Great way to switch from windows to linux

Rookie

goofrider

Posted
Posted
Debian / Other Debian-based...

More precisely: MEPIS.

Holds similar quality as Ubuntu, but this distro was from the scratch designed for KDE, not Gnome.

Currently, the popularity ranking (based on distro page visits) on Distrowatch.com shows:

1. Ubuntu

2. Mandrake

3. Fedora

4. MEPIS

5. SUSE

6. Debian

7. Knoppix

... which speaks a bit of its popularity and curiosity it's raising. :)

I'm therefore a bit surprised that it's not even a choice here.  :(

585722483[/snapback]

I believe SimplyMEPIS was largely derived from Knoppix. I could be wrong though.

Most Debian/KDE live CD distros are derived from Knoppix.

Rookie

goofrider

Posted
Posted (edited)
Why is Ubuntu so popular?  What does it have that others don't?

585748123[/snapback]

http://www.ubuntulinux.org/ubuntu/releases/

http://www.ubuntulinux.org/ubuntu/relationship/

In a nutshell, Ubuntu is desktop-oriented, community-driven distro for x86, AMD64 and PPC, with a rapid development cycle based on snapshots of Debian Sid.

Long version:

Ubuntu has a 6-month release cycle, sychronized with each release of Gnome. At each release cycle, it takes a snapshot from Debian Sid and integrates Ubuntu's own changes, then it's repository is frozen at the end of the release cycle. Ubuntu achieves a more rapid cycle by narrowing its focus to to the desktop, restricting its target to 3 CPU architetures and shrinking the number of offcially supported packages. Ubuntu splits Debian's main section into two: Ubuntu main (officially supported) and Ubuntu universe (community supported). Ubuntu main only has a fraction of the packages in Debian main, the rest is in universe.

While it's taken from Debian Sid at each cycle, Ubuntu has it's own package repository (unlike, say, Knoppix, Progency, MEPIS, etc., which all relies on Debian's official repo). Each final release version of Ubuntu has its own frozen repository, so you don't have to worry about a newer (but buggy) package in Sid's archive breaking your system.

It also tracks Gnome closely. One of its missions is to include the latest version of Gnome as soon as it's released. Ubuntu Hoary went final in a matter of days after Gnome 2.10 did.

I find Ubuntu's installation painless. Debian tends to ask me too many questions during X server installation, while Ubuntu pretty much did everything automatically. Though Ubuntu is probably not quite as good as Knoppix in the hardware detection department. Ubuntu also includes some closed source hardware drivers by default, though it otherwise stick to a free software-only policy.

Ubuntu is commited to fit its installation on a single CD. You can download all the xtra packages using apt-get. Like Debian, you can always download the next release via apt-get and do an in-place upgrade, instead of downloading another ISO for the upgrade.

Ubuntu is also the first and only Debian distro to switch to X.org's X server. Debian Sid is still using XFree86 and X.org is still broken.

Finally, Ubuntu has a lively community similar to that of Fedora. It can be difficult to find support for Debian due to its breadth. It relies on some 30 mailing lists and has no official forums. Ubuntu's support is much more centralized, and its narrower focus also make it easier to find answers.

What Ubuntu doesn't differ from Debian is that Ubuntu has a strict free software policy, it's built on Debian Sid so it maintain the same rigid packaging policy and Q&A. Apt-get provides the same painless package management and version upgrades (never have to download more ISOs for each upgrade).

So there you have it. Ubuntu is to Debian as Fedora is to Red Hat, with some added commercial backing and free software philosophy.

Edited by goofrider
Proficient

meeseontheleese

Posted
Posted

id say ubuntu, my im a heavy multimedia user, and so far it really hasnt been doing that well for getting my media to work correctly. so im thinking of switching to fedora core 3, if theres a way to not use kde and gnome instead (is there?)

Grand Master

blik

Posted
Posted
id say ubuntu, my im a heavy multimedia user, and so far it really hasnt been doing that well for getting my media to work correctly. so im thinking of switching to fedora core 3, if theres a way to not use kde and gnome instead (is there?)

585764276[/snapback]

Yes, and gnome is the default WM in FC3 afaik. I dont think you'll get a better multimedia experience using FC3 either. Whats wrong with Ubuntu, or what cant you get working?

Proficient

meeseontheleese

Posted
Posted

sweet, might make the switch to fc3 (whats afaik) then. Ubuntu is okay, but when i try to get mp3s to work on say amarok or rhythm box, no luck

( i get that /dev/dsp or something like that is busy or some other error). they work on totem, but one a song at a time, and i wanna switch on the fly from a program. Speaking of totem, when i try to watch a movie from it, it lags horribly. Also after a while or so ill get some failed sequences in my boot (dual boot with winxp), dont really know the reason. Might be how i mounted my ntfs partition, help in the link right here if you can

msg43 saying:

"....... it like fedora 3 w/out the bs (mp3,etc...) and it has a bunch of nifty features that are ...."

Grand Master

markwolfe Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
^ afaik = as far as i know

And i think msg43 was reffering to the licensing issue with mp3's which now affects Ubuntu as well as Fedora/Red Hat. After reading his post I think he is promoting Ubuntu over FC3...

585765401[/snapback]

The MP3 licensing also affects SUSE now. Thank you, Software Patents. :rolleyes:

I am a FC user, but it is possible that you will run into the same problems as you did in Ubuntu. Possible, also, that things will be easier. Sometimes a different approach is what it takes to 'click'. If there was a perfect distro for everyone, then everyone would use it, no? ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By duhk · Posted

      I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By Michael Scrip · Posted

      I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By PsYcHoKiLLa · Posted

      Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By Jose_49 · Posted

      This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Carru_123 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      251
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!