[Definitive] Nintendo Wii Thread


Recommended Posts

Ya I noticed that right away too, I wrote it off as coincidence tho... (I suppose they might purposely be hinting...)

The biggest thing for me was the fact that

a) Nintendo was mentioning "feel" everywhere, so obviously alot of peoples assumptions have been based around that to some degree. This of course takes it to the level where "feel" means "feel".

b) On the website they mentioned the technology being used for gaming more than anything else. I mean, that would be a totally KICKASS 3d modeling tool to go along with 3d studio max or milkshape. I can think of so many other uses than just gaming... infact, as far as PC gaming goes, I don't see quick adoption, but if it were standard in a console, obviously it would get out there and be free to use.

I still hope for a vr headset tho :blush:

Edited by Erich
Very interesting read apperntly confirming the Nitendo On Video as real and also explaining the tech specs of the Revolution. As moz says take it with a pinch of salt:

http://mozlapunk.web-log.nl/log/2947883

:D

586161920[/snapback]

fake...

as far as i know isn't the new Zelda for GC....so this right here would prove its false wouldn't it...

I also know for a fact that the new Zelda for the Revolution is being created by Shigeru Miyomoto

^ and yes in the article it does say that he's talking about Twilight Princess...not the Revolution Zelda....hell, he mentions Twilight Princess going to Revolution like a billion times....and hasn't been confirmed over and over that its a GC game....

fake...

as far as i know isn't the new Zelda for GC....so this right here would prove its false wouldn't it...

^ and yes in the article it does say that he's talking about Twilight Princess...not the Revolution Zelda....hell, he mentions Twilight Princess going to Revolution like a billion times....and hasn't been confirmed over and over that its a GC game....

586163148[/snapback]

Uh the demos at the E3 were on the GameCube and next month's or a future Nintendo power is going to have demo disks. Plus every video game website has it registered as GameCube, not to mention EB and GameStop have pre-orders for it already for GameCube. There is more evidence that it is going to be on the GameCube rather then the Revolution.

http://www.poc.com/emerging_products/3d_display/default.asp

* True 3-D viewing with the naked eye, no goggles or special glasses are required.

* Real-Time high resolution viewing.

* Multi-Zone Views ? one 24?x3? viewing zone is standard, up to 6 viewing zones (same view) can be recorded.

* ?Look Around? views can be achieved with additional LCD projectors.

* HDS? Holographic Display Screens can be manufactured up to 35?x35?.

* High Brightness ? full color displays.

* Two LCD Projectors are included.

* 3D images are created using 2-D projectors

* POC software interface is compatible with PC based windows 3-D software - OGL, Direct X, 3DMAX, MAYA.OBJ.

* Chromium Cluster contains three CPUs networked with a 100 Mbps Ethernet link. ?Each? CPU contains a 1.6 GHz Pentium 4 processor, 512 MB of DDR ram memory.

seems like it might be possible for the revo.

Uh the demos at the E3 were on the GameCube and next month's or a future Nintendo power is going to have demo disks.  Plus every video game website has it registered as GameCube, not to mention EB and GameStop have pre-orders for it already for GameCube.  There is more evidence that it is going to be on the GameCube rather then the Revolution.

586164342[/snapback]

i'm thinking you totally misunderstood my post...

i know its a gamecube game....but this article that i was refering to mentions about a billion times that it will be on Revolution...

i was using him saying it was a Revolution game to prove that the whole article was most likely BS....

I know there is some talk regarding "the revolution zelda" which is essentially just a reference to the pre-e3 conference where Nintendo said they are making a new zelda to be released for the revolution. So YES, they are working on a new zelda. ALSO there are a few different Nintendo departments that make zelda games, they pass games around to different designers to keep the games fresh with different peoples different takes on them.

ALSO there are a few different Nintendo departments that make zelda games, they pass games around to different designers to keep the games fresh with different peoples different takes on them.

586165188[/snapback]

From what I remember reading, Zelda is only developed by the Nintendo Entertainment Analysis and Development (EAD) division run by Miyamoto. I don't think different divisions work on the Zelda series: Wikipedia

Though it's an interesting read, I think the whole thing is fake. What convinced me was that he kept talking about the ON thing being real, highly unlikely IMHO, as well as all that talk about the controller having different pieces and the 'project reality' add-on. I seriously doubt Nintendo would want to confuse their costumers having so many separate components. Their focusing on simplicity.

From what I remember reading, Zelda is only developed by the Nintendo Entertainment Analysis and Development (EAD) division run by Miyamoto.  I don't think different divisions work on the Zelda series: Wikipedia

586165502[/snapback]

Since I don't have an edit button, I will reply to myself.

I stand correct, there have been other divisons that worked on Zelda besides Miyamoto's divison. Starts at bottom of page and continues on a for a few pages: Nintendo's Divisions

I know there is some talk regarding "the revolution zelda" which is essentially just a reference to the pre-e3 conference where Nintendo said they are making a new zelda to be released for the revolution. So YES, they are working on a new zelda. ALSO there are a few different Nintendo departments that make zelda games, they pass games around to different designers to keep the games fresh with different peoples different takes on them.

586165188[/snapback]

i know a revolution Zelda is in development...

but in the article he refered numerous times to Twilight Princess being for Revolution....which we all know it is not....i was using that to prove that the article is BS....that is all...i was not saying there will not be a Revolution Zelda....i was just saying this article is BS because he mentions a million times that Twilight Princess will be on Revolution....

excerpt for the article/ he is saying that is there is a zelda being developed for the Rev, but then he tlks about TP for GC..

I also know for a fact that the new Zelda for the Revolution is being created by Shigeru Miyomoto and will be a chronicological sequel to Ocarina of time and Majora?s Mask.

But from what I?ve played from the exclusive insider demo of Twilight Princess( the version the public hasn?t seen). It looks to take the crown of game of the year. From what I have seen it takes things like context-sensitive cut-scenes and action-sequences that made RE4 and God of War so good and expands on them in-game and in cutscene.

I also know for a fact that the new Zelda for the Revolution is being created by Shigeru Miyomoto and will be a chronicological sequel to Ocarina of time and Majora?s Mask.

586167577[/snapback]

Unless if you are Shigeru Miyamoto himself I seriously doubt you know when the Revolution Zelda is going to take place and what its place in the timeline is.
Unless if you are Shigeru Miyamoto himself I seriously doubt you know when the Revolution Zelda is going to take place and what its place in the timeline is.

586168221[/snapback]

He answered those questions in an interview I believe. I seem to remember hearing the same thing reading one.

He answered those questions in an interview I believe. I seem to remember hearing the same thing reading one.

586169798[/snapback]

The only thing Shiggy or Itawa said about Revolution's Zelda was that it was being made. They never said any details about it because frankly I do not think they have even really begun on the project considering Zelda: TP is not finished and released yet.

I think I've found some info on the revolution!!!

this new image that nintendo had registered for a patent puts an emphasis on the "v":

RevolutionLogo3.jpg

I remember Nintendo registering something with a "V" sometime ago.

It turns out that in December 2004 Nintendo did in fact register what they call "V Pocket". check out this picture with the same ephasis on the "V".

nintendovpocket.jpg

What do you guys think?

Could the revolution controller be the "V Pocket"

What are your thoughts?

V-Pocket... hmm...

Finally, Revolution made Matsuhara think of the term "Ubiquitous," referring to the shared goal with Nintendo of making games that that everyone can play anywhere. Matsuhara actually offers a vision of what he hopes will become of the system's controller. He wants a controller that people can take with them and connect to WiFi in order to keep playing their games.

IGN

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!