[Definitive] Nintendo Wii Thread


Recommended Posts

Yeah. Because their stuff doesnt work.

Nintendo Fiscal 2005 (Ended March 31, 2005)

Sales: ?515,292 ($4,798)

Profit: ?87,416 ($814)

Assets: ?1,132,492 ($10,546)

http://forum.pcvsconsole.com/viewthread.php?tid=11760&page=5

http://www.nintendo.co.jp/n10/news/050526e.pdf

O_o

Yeah.  Because their stuff doesnt work.

Nintendo Fiscal 2005 (Ended March 31, 2005)

Sales: ?515,292 ($4,798)

Profit: ?87,416 ($814)

Assets: ?1,132,492 ($10,546)

http://forum.pcvsconsole.com/viewthread.php?tid=11760&page=5

http://www.nintendo.co.jp/n10/news/050526e.pdf

O_o

586532448[/snapback]

What has Sony done that you can call "innovative?" Eye toy? Please.

I was really afraid of being disappointed by Nintendo. When I first saw it I was just kinda...meh...I wasn't disappointed, but I wasn't blown away either. But the more I've read about it and thought about the possibilities I am really getting excited about this. I am definitely gonna save my money for this console.

One of the ideas that got me really excited is really simple, but it would be amazingly fun if implemented right "What if you could use two controllers at once for Fight Night or a new Punch Out?"

You sure would look goofy waving two TV remotes around like a mad man, but it would be fun.

Holy crap I just came home from my gf's house, having auto-convinced myself that Iwata wouldn't say anything, and boom! there's the controller!!

I don't like the design so far, but the posibilities are endless. FPS will rock with this, even for the hardcore PC gamers that don't play consoles cause of the lack of a mouse-keyboard combo. These should be an experience everyone should, well, experiment.

And Ja !! I had set it before, I had predicted it somewhere in this thread, that it would be cool if you could control aiming in a game with the regular control like a light gun. I guess there'll be a lot of FPS and light-gun games coming out for Rev now.

To be honest, I was mildly shocked when I first saw the photo, but the more I read about it and look at it, the more I want one. Which is more than I can say about the PS3 and 360 setups. Kudos to Nintendo for having the extra-large nuts to bet their future on straying from the pack on conformity.

~JM

586532211[/snapback]

I second that. Even if Rev fails (which I most seriously doubt) and people don't like it, you just have to bow, take your hats off, and take a moment of silence for Nintendo, for making stuff like this, only wanting to make the experience better for ALL gamers. Thank you Nintendo.

So much potential... i can see Microsoft and Sony following soon with this because WOW... i so want to use this now, especially after the possibilities link :|:D :D

586532282[/snapback]

Yeah, this is even better than the eye-toy, which btw I consider a very cool device.

-bYtE,Sep 15 2005, 23:37]This is sooooo brilliant it's sick!! Love you Nintendo!

586532327[/snapback]

No one could have said it better :p

When did I mention Sony or the PS2?

I don't get why people call this a gimmick. It's not a gimmick when it has a functionallity. Getting tired of hearing this. Sony also have called DS a gimmick. Think people, think!

I want to play games, I dont want to play with a controller. I shouldnt have to think about what my hands are doing. Cutting up a game pad isnt innovation, its just plain lazy. Look at it. Its still buttons and a D-Pad. The only new features game pads have gotten since the 80s are analogue buttons and sticks. Not that amazing really is it?

Yeah.  Because their stuff doesnt work.

Nintendo Fiscal 2005 (Ended March 31, 2005)

Sales: ?515,292 ($4,798)

Profit: ?87,416 ($814)

Assets: ?1,132,492 ($10,546)

http://forum.pcvsconsole.com/viewthread.php?tid=11760&page=5

http://www.nintendo.co.jp/n10/news/050526e.pdf

O_o

586532448[/snapback]

You realize that's in millions correct?

One of the ideas that got me really excited is really simple, but it would be amazingly fun if implemented right "What if you could use two controllers at once for Fight Night or a new Punch Out?"

You sure would look goofy waving two TV remotes around like a mad man, but it would be fun.

586532483[/snapback]

I can see the powerglove making a comeback for these type of games. I haven't owned a console since the snes but this is something I can't wait to try, and if I like it you can be sure I will I will get one.

My head is still running around in circles with all kinds of emotions, excitiment and regret and mournful. Excited because it looks amazing and all the possiblities of what might be hooked into the side of that remote, regret and mournful though because this might be harder to adapt to alot of next gen games. ALTHOUGH seeing that Splinter cell 4 is a definate title, then that means Clancy is on board imagine Ghost Recon with this!!! I can't wait! I want it now!!

As for extra bits costing more, well if we look back at Nintendo's other add-ins they don't drive up the price of the game when they pack them together, at least in Canada they dont, so its a welcome addon.

This might just bring console gaming to grandma, or at least grandpa for simple to use fishing games at the least.

Good job Nintendo, I just hope this works.

I want to play games, I dont want to play with a controller. I shouldnt have to think about what my hands are doing.

586532493[/snapback]

Do you have to think about what your mouse hand is doing when playing a PC game? Have you tried a browser with mouse gestures?

Once you learn to associate gestures with tasks you don't really have to think about them, in many cases it should be even easier then using buttons because it will be more intuitive about what motion does what you want rather than remembering what position of button does what. A certain gesture can imply something about what the character does e.g. a sweeping motion as a slash of a sword, a button cannot.

it would be amazingly fun if implemented right

586532483[/snapback]

Keyword: if. Lets see if Nintendo delivers.

"What if you could use two controllers at once for Fight Night or a new Punch Out?"

586532483[/snapback]

People will knock each other out. In court the defendant will say "I swear, I didnt mean to knock him out literally." :laugh:

wow... when i first saw the pic i was like a remote... aww man that blows... but after reading IGN's article about it. It does sound pretty interesting... i wanna get my hands on this... it looks amazing for FPS games... i wonder how would the work that out with 4 other ppl tho... also i kno im gonna knock the person beside me out when i first start using that thing... i just hope i dont throw it anywhere, especially at my tv...

If you haven't already check out the video that someone posted in the other thread, SO AWESOME: http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2005/09/16/443527.html

586532719[/snapback]

Watched it, I wonder if Nintendo can pull it off as shown in that video. Even then it doesnt seem practical (get tired easily).

did this just get announced? cuz i didn't see anything mentioned, and i just happened to be browsing ign when i came across it.

i think it will be pretety sweet, especially how you can flip it on it's side.

Why does everyone think you need to use your full arm's length to use the controller? And why does punching your buddies always come up? It's not virtual reality, people (if it was, those kinds of issues would come up, don't you think?).

The video exagerates movement to point out the idea. When you see an advertisement of kids flinging their elbows up and turning the controller, do you think you really have to do that to play the old racing games with standard controllers? You only have to make the controller move, not your whole arm.

Edited by MrDizzystick
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!