[Definitive] Nintendo Wii Thread


Recommended Posts

Well this is basically what happened. And what I think will happen with the revolution.

1. GC suppored high def with component cable.

2. Component cables didn't sell.

3. Nintendo Discontinued to digital output to save money.

4. Nintendo see market doesn't care for this feature so they keep it out of next console to save more money off the bat.

5. People buy into, maybe they'll make a later revision with component plug in to see how it goes (as well, they maybe be able to increase the frequency of the gpu with furthered nano technology at this point for no additional cost in order to push games that are demanding every last bit of performance out of the revolution at the higher resolution)

There will be surveys and studies etc. before Nintendo considers #5. They're in the business to make money.

True, but a lot of people have a TV for TV programming... I think that by 2010 the minimum percentage of people with HDTV sets will be at least 85%, and if that isn't reason enough to have a HD-ready next-gen system then :unsure: .

Lol I wouldn't put too much stock into that.

For one there will be converters that take the digital stuff and make it analog, for two people still ownt buy it, I'm in rental and there are still people who refuse to buy a DVD player and get mad at me when a movie isn't released on VHS like it's my fault. Freaking morons, like I'm moonlighting asa rental store associate when by nights I sit on MGM's board of directors making decisions on what to put out, idiots.

But anyways what was said above was true, everything we've bought will continue to work as it has, there's no time bomb in our TV's that will go off when they finally make the move to HDTV, analog will continue to exist side by side with HDTV for the late adopters, and life will go on as usual.

DVD never cost me ?1000's unlike HD.

For HD Programmes, you need to buy a Sky/Cable HD reciever = ?500 then pay an extra subscription

You will need to buy a HDTV = ?600 - ?1000

HD Gaming = Xbox 360 = ?279 - PS3 = ?499?

HD DVD/BluRay = ?300+

It is not going to become standard for at least 10 years in the UK, plenty of time for Nintendo to support it.

I'm looking to buy an HD set, and this still isn't important to me that N isn't putting HD on the console. IT would be nice, but not a deal breaker for me.

Think of it this way; you play softball/football/soccer to have fun. You'll play on crappy fields, in the street, etc. Now you have a chance to play in a real stadium in another town. Once you do, will you never play again in the crappy field or the street, just because the stadium is in another town that's far away? Will you really cutoff your gameplay because something that looks better is available? Not if you really like playing games, you won't.

As Nintendo's own legend Shigeru Miyamoto was speaking at DIEC, he summed up what everyone seems to know about the Revolution controller. Except this time, he added one more thing. Near the end of his speech, Miyamoto throws in this little bit of information: "There's another secret, but I'm not going to go into that here. That'll be for a later date." Here's hoping Nintendo reveals more on their new system soon, because it seems the more we discover, the less we truly know.

GameCube Cafe

thats so true... dyam u nintendo *shakes fist*

I was playing "F-Zero GX" for a little while today on an SDTV, and I thought the graphics were great. Just fine; really good, actually. If the Nintendo "Rev" will be able to produce better gfx than the GCN is able to, that's pretty much enough. Should be fine. The focus should be on gameplay anyway.

Revolution's Big Secret

Miyamoto says there's still more to show.

by Matt Casamassina

December 2, 2005 - Nintendo bigwigs including Shigeru Miyamoto spoke at Japan's Digital Interactive Entertainment Conference today and while no specifics on games or hardware were revealed, some intriguing Revolution gossip was spun all the same, according to the website kotaku.com.

The site reports that Miyamoto again talked about the possibilities of the Revolution controller, and referred to the peripheral's nunchuck-style analog add-on. Most interesting, though, was what Miyamoto didn't talk about. The Nintendo legend flat-out stated that there's more to be revealed about the Revolution controller.

"There's another secret [about the Revolution controller]," he stated. "But I'm not going to go into that here. That'll be for a later date."

The news is in line with Nintendo of Europe demi-god Jim Merrick's recent statements that not everything about the Revolution controller has been shown.

Readers can expect full disclosure on the peripheral, the console, and its games at the Electronics Entertainment Expo 2006, which kicks off in Los Angeles next May.

Source: http://cube.ign.com/articles/673/673299p1.html

hyping your console is an art. trickling information to the public slowly creates media buzz and consumer hype. If your periodically release information about your product it makes sure you're always being talked about. nintendo understands this.

yes but not when:

1 one of the competitors released the console

2 the others going to in half a year, with a full presentation at ces in a month

3 nintendo only released information about a controller thats different than the rest, and claims to bring a revolution to gaming

yes but not when:

1 one of the competitors released the console

2 the others going to in half a year, with a full presentation at ces in a month

3 nintendo only released information about a controller thats different than the rest, and claims to bring a revolution to gaming

I agree with you - But, Nintendo said they don't want to be in competition with sony and microsoft. They don't care if the 360 has been released... they also don't care if ps3 is going to have a full presentation at CES. They're taking a different route, which has nothing to do with the other consoles.

I think Nintendo is being smart by doing things their own way. It may be a bizzare approach, but I'm confident it's gonna benefit Nintendo.

i have full respect for nintendo, and maybe their weird approaches. but i dont see them not being in competition. theyre always stating that theyre not in competition, but in the realistic world, theyre aiming for profit, and this approach to marketing isnt going to bring them the market share enough for sky high profits.

maybe their concept to revolution will.

i have full respect for nintendo, and maybe their weird approaches. but i dont see them not being in competition. theyre always stating that theyre not in competition, but in the realistic world, theyre aiming for profit, and this approach to marketing isnt going to bring them the market share enough for sky high profits.

maybe their concept to revolution will.

Well to be fair, I believe they were the only ones to to turn a profit on there console this time around.

i have full respect for nintendo, and maybe their weird approaches. but i dont see them not being in competition. theyre always stating that theyre not in competition, but in the realistic world, theyre aiming for profit, and this approach to marketing isnt going to bring them the market share enough for sky high profits.

maybe their concept to revolution will.

I'm pretty sure that this approach will give them plenty of market share. Have you compared the DS to the PSP lately. The PSP is in so many ways superior to the DS, and yet the DS is killing the PSP in sales (hardware and software).

The Revolution has been compared to the DS in many ways. When we first heard of the DS, all we knew was that it would have two screens. No one really knew what the DS was all about until E3 2004 where it was completely unveiled. The DS was released later that year.

We know a little bit about the revolution. We've seen the console and the controller, but nothing else. Nintendo is planning to reveal everything at E3 2006 with a release later that same year.

They're marketing worked for the DS, and I am thinking it might work for the Revolution as well.

And, like Ryan V said - "they were the only ones to turn a profit on their console this time around."

Well to be fair, I believe they were the only ones to to turn a profit on there console this time around

i read something in july or aug, that said the gamecube made the most profit, and the PS2 made profit in early 2004.i might be wrong.

the real winner of the pass gen was nintendo.

PSP vs DS. was people had a I pod to play MP3s, why get a movie on the go and only see it on a little screen or they can go home and watch the same movie on a 20" or bigger TV even a 15", but i PSP did have the internet, both played games but on is more.

the handheld i would buy, is the PSP because the internet, MP3s(dont have an I pod),i dont realy care about handheld gaming, i played a game on the PSP and it sucked(the lack of an anolog stick part of the problame)

PSP vs DS. was people had a I pod to play MP3s, why get a movie on the go and only see it on a little screen or they can go home and watch the same movie on a 20" or bigger TV even a 15", but i PSP did have the internet, both played games but on is more.

Would you mind rewriting this statement... i don't get it.

i have full respect for nintendo, and maybe their weird approaches. but i dont see them not being in competition. theyre always stating that theyre not in competition, but in the realistic world, theyre aiming for profit, and this approach to marketing isnt going to bring them the market share enough for sky high profits.

maybe their concept to revolution will.

They have stated the fact over and over again they are not going to be directly competing with the Xbox360 and PS3. That they are taking a different path.

Plus I like how they are keeping things a mystery, I like it better then if they revealed everything at once and then we had to wait a year for it to come out. Come E3 2006 you know who is pretty much going to own the show.

For the person that said it's all about making profit, Nintendo is *really* good at that and are making excellent profit on their systems. Nintendo is third place in mindshare and marketshare in North America but they are still making a good profit here and in other markets, and will be around for a long time making the awesome games they always have. Whether the majority of North America realizes that or not is irrelevant to most Nintendo fans I think, as long as they keep the games coming along

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!