[Definitive] Nintendo Wii Thread


Recommended Posts

Nintendo is promising to give out these TV remotes, that look exactly like the controller...blahdiblah.

http://revolution.ign.com/articles/670/670504p1.html

It seems so obvious. The remote will double as a universal television remote, they're not sending out a tv remote, it's the controller. :D

The guys over at IGN's Revolution site have come forward with more developer details about the Revolution console, and its power, or lack thereof. We've known since day one Nintendo isn't going for a graphical approach with the console, instead concentrating on a low price, downloading capabilities, and of course, the unique controller. According to developer sources, the console will have even less RAM than previously thought: instead of 128MB, it will build on the GameCube's original 40MB of RAM with an extra 64MB, making for a total of 104MB of RAM. Also mentioned was the system's potential clockspeed, as it may only be double that of the GameCube's. Brought up as well was the disc space of Revolution discs: while they will be 12cm, like DVDs, they won't in fact be DVDs, but a propritary Nintendo format able to hold 4.7 GB of space for a single-sided disc and 8.5 GB for a double-sided disc, a huge step up from the 1.5 GB minidiscs of the GameCube. However, the biggest shocker is the sources' unanimous agreement on a launch price for the console, based on the tech: a mere $149. One developer even stated a $99 launch price, which has been rumored, is not out of the question. While the lack of tech in the system (sans the controller) is certainly disappointing, the fact that this system may sell for a dirt-cheap price may make this a bit easier to swallow. Nintendo has promised a nice stream of news to come over the next year, culminating at E3 2006, so definitely stay tuned.

GameCube Cafe

so far nintendo its going to b dirt cheap compared to xbox360 and the rumoured ps3 price....

Mario 128 unvieling for the gamecube @ every single E3 they said they would

first there was no unvieling of the game whatsoever... second it was moved onto revolution. :angry: one of my most anticipated Nintendo games ever that the promise has never seen the light of day.

i'm going to the bar and am too lazy to find a source, i'm sure you know of whats going on with Mario 128, its probably the biggest lost promise Nintendo ever made. :angry:

Well, if I recall correctly, Mario 128 started as a technical demo, and was only later titled as an actual game, which is still promised to come. At worst that's just pushing back dates (a lot, I'll give you that, though), and what I'm talking about (though I probably didn't emphasize it enough) is promising features and not delivering the way they promised.

Back on topic, I'm perplexed by those tech specs. Not only cause they show that Nintendo really is serious about specs not being that important, but also cause of the price range. Can anyone tell me if any company ever released a next gen console so cheap (given the market)?

In any case, this could either greatly benefit Nintendo (prolly everyone would get a Revolution at that price range if even just for the novelty of the controller and the old games) or greatly hurt them (people would simply prefer a more powerfull console and totally dismiss it). I'm leaning towards the former.

Not that I don't like what they'll offer in terms of games but I wish they'd spend the money on their system to atleast make it as comparable so developers don't have an excuse not to put their game out for it.. though if that's going to be the price then I'm definitely buying it.

Well, more information about the PS3 has been released, but the thing is you can't trust something that comes from Sony so far. They always overhype their products prior to launch, and little by little take away stuff or we find out that some features are not what they promised. So the point is that the information out there so far from the PS3 release isn't conclusive until either the thing is out, or closer to it.

Now as far as Nintendo, for better or worse, they always keep their promises and support their decisions. So whatever little information we know officially from them, we can be sure that's the way it's going to be. If I'm mistaken on this, please point me somewhere that proves otherwise.

Oh, I definitely agree with that, but we've at least seen some real-time footage of games for the PS3, like MGS4. That's really what I was thinking of when I made the statement.

Proper Backward compatibility?

The GameCube RAM and Revolution RAM is the same type of RAM.. so why aren't they using the same thing? .... But.. perhaps some GameCube games are stupid enough to assume that they only have so much memory, so perhaps thats why.. shouldn't the Emulated games just be running off the Revolution RAM? Instead of having its own dedicated memory?

Edited by Pc_Madness

I like Nintendo and all but if they're saying the controller is the big point of this release then why don't they make a new controller for the gamecube.. lol.. it doesn't seem that great to be honest but if its cheap i might get it ;) I could careless for hdtv support too (which rev doesn't have), even though I have an hdtv, I hardly see a difference from digital to hdtv broadcasts :blink:

$150? $99? Don't get your hopes up. That seems a little radical still, all this does.

Well if the article turns out being true, they are essentially beefing up and minaturizing the current GameCube hardware so it could sell for a significantly lower price then the other nextgen consoles and almost come close to the current GameCube price. A 2-3x more powerful GameCube for that price would be very nice.

Besides remeber Nintendo didn't want us to know the specs.

It's probably just me, but I find the two articles highly suspicious. Nintendo is the Fort Knox of keeping secrets, I don't know how something like this could be leaked, especially if developers have to sign a NDA or something along the lines of that not to talk about the hardware. The Nintendo DS, GameBoy Micro, the Revolution, the Revolution controller, etc. were kept under wraps until Nintendo decided to reveal them on their terms. It just seems weird after Nintendo pretty much saying they were not going to release the specs that a developer would suddenly leak them.

Edited by jmole

It's probably just me, but I find the two articles highly suspicious. Nintendo is the Fort Knox of keeping secrets, I don't know how something like this could be leaked, especially if developers have to sign a NDA or something along the lines of that not to talk about the hardware. The Nintendo DS, GameBoy Micro, the Revolution, the Revolution controller, etc. were kept under wraps until Nintendo decided to reveal them on their terms. It just seems weird after Nintendo pretty much saying they were not going to release the specs that a developer would suddenly leak them.

Yea, I find that strange aswel...

Why? You are just going to leave the hundreds of 360 threads laying out then aren't you?

This was a pointless move.

He wanted to make room for more 360 threads so people will more easily see the old threads and stop posting repeat threads :)

I'm sure when the Revolution is released they'll start merging xbox threads into the main one (altho at that time there will be no more hype and most of the threads should be a little more diverse and less "OMFG i got one it's awesome" Just like how Nintendo threads are "I wonder..." and "I bet they..."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!