What's your take on the name?  

985 members have voted

  1. 1. What's your take on the name?

    • Awesome
      124
    • Alright
      371
    • Horrible
      397
    • Undecided
      93


Recommended Posts

I don't like it.

It sounds more of a product name than a version name. ie. Microsoft Vista would be a good name for a new microsoft product, but Microsoft Windows Vista just doesn't sound right.

I think that it could confuse less computerwise users and they might think its a new addon for Windows like Plus!

If you use a dictionary and look up what Vista means, it's actually a very clever name.  :yes:

586255808[/snapback]

vis?ta

n.

A distant view or prospect, especially one seen through an opening, as between rows of buildings or trees.

An avenue or other passage affording such a view.

An awareness of a range of time, events, or subjects; a broad mental view: ?the deep and sweeping vistas these pioneering critics opened up? (Arthur C. Danto).

www.dictionary.com

I think it's a pretty good name, remember that Ms can't fulfill everybody's wishes so just go with it.

It doesn't matter what it's called as long as it does the things they say it does etc.

I doubt anybody isn't gonna use Windows Vista just because of its name.

If you use a dictionary and look up what Vista means, it's actually a very clever name.  :yes:

586255808[/snapback]

I already know what it means. It means view in spanish and italian. Even so, i made it because the name sucks in my opinion. Note the word "my". People have other views of it. That is just mine.

If you use a dictionary and look up what Vista means, it's actually a very clever name.  :yes:

586255808[/snapback]

Certainly is.

What do you see when you look through a Window? A vista. A view.

"Clarity" is also very appropriate.

The name is growing on me, for sure.

No troll - I guess you've never heard of Sam Kinneson?

It's called HUMOR!

Geez - lighten-up!

--ScottKin

586253858[/snapback]

Humour is a difficult beast on the internet.

Technically, telling someone to "Do the world a favor - help clean-up the gene pool by jumping from the highest cliff or precipice - and no cheating by using a parachute or bungie-cord." could be construed as a rule violation for threatening/personal attacks on another member (Community Rule #4).

As it is, I'll leave it as I think he can bear it as a less than serious comment.

anyway i like the whole 'lighter' look of the flag logo and the non-bold font; which is similar to what ive seen in concepts for the next hotmail. even though the flag logo under some circumstances looks just like a flat design with a spotlight in the center (especially on the neowin front page where they put such a heavy drop shadow behind it, but also just on a white background). i dont like using a noun like 'Vista' as the version marker. especially since it sounds like a program for windows instead of just an upgrade or new version. also on the official page on microsoft's site, the graphic of the two onlookers is a bit silly, it would look much better if they just did the mountain imagery alone without the onlookers.

i would say its the best of names but im sure people will get used to it just how they did with longhorn.

the good thing is that it fuels out community with lots of parodys and jokes about termintator 2 :p perhaps that maybe the name vista should be saying astalavista :p we can have lots of fun with this :D:D:D

i would have thought with seeing the flag in white in longhorn they wouldve done an Apple style and kept the logo white. With every new release they change the flag, they didnt that much in this version. And I hope with the boot screen its in full color and not stamped with microsoft everywhere.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!