Family Guy: The Leak Story


Recommended Posts

wow..i am surprised that this thread has not been shut down yet... links to the freakin' torrent files, rampant talk downloading the movie before it was realeased....

Anyways, I am excited to see the movie.... I'll wait til' it comes out, unless one of my friends ends of downloading it and then I'll probably end up watchint it with him or her.

but hootchie... there is no way people should even get this, only way is threw illegal means...

586271875[/snapback]

True but I WILL be buying it. So I don't see a problem in getting an extreamly high quality rip if I ain't going to be able to get it legally for a VERY long time (as I know it will take along time before it comes here in stores.)

I think its pretty rediculous when movies are put on the web before they are even released in theatres or on DVD. I mean, I can see things like "shakey cam" videos taken from inside theatres, where the quality is so poor that no one really needs to think twice about actually spending money to see the movie. But in an age where the pirates are many steps ahead of the film creators... well, I just think things have gotten so out of hand. They are also the cause for all the drastic security measures (DRM stuff and copy protection) which haunt the everyday average joe-movie rentalist.

i havn't downloaded it and i'm not going to either.. but i was reading some comments and thought this was interesting..

Heres some intressting info about some of our peers, safepeer the azureus peerguardianlike plugin says: 64.161.47.185 was in range cinema source advertising 154.20.229.123 was in range performance systems international inc 68.206.65.12 was in range road runner 24.28.37.171 was in range time warner communications tampa 154.20.233.249 was in range performance systems international inc 61.207.210.145 was in range japan network information center 65.94.93.180 was in range bell nexxia (prod) 154.20.87.178 was in range performance systems international inc To our american friends: Be careful, since pirating has been turned into terrorism by the department of homeland security (and that dude testifying in the senate that downloading = supporting terrorism). Get safepeer and stuff.
But IT doesnt give the companies a right to tell me I can't make a copy of it so the original doesn't get scratched and quit working, instead of rebuying it again.

586271689[/snapback]

how are you making a copy of something you own by downloading it. And how are you making a copy of something that is not out yet in the stores....

Be careful, since pirating has been turned into terrorism by the department of homeland security (and that dude testifying in the senate that downloading = supporting terrorism)

You could, y'know, download an actual terrorist.

Maybe you need a printer for that.

SPOILERS in white text

Lots of usage of the F word and the story is a bit too prologned. Not as funny as episodes of the Television show, but still a pretty good movie.

7/10

586271542[/snapback]

I agree. :yes: You would think that comedy wasn't the target or something... :wacko:

makes you wonder if these things are done on purpose for publicity reasons.

i mean, those that will watch it in theatre will most likely never download. and those that know how to download will never go to theatre anyways.

586272246[/snapback]

That's only the case for some individuals though, not everyone.

In this films case it's a straight to DVD release so the amount of downloaders will be sky high but fans will buy it anyway.

Compared to the $5 a cinema ticket costs and the $20 of a DVD

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!