Internet Explorer 7 Beta 1

By Boomiej
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

SuperJediMedia

Posted
Posted

Is this pretty much correct?

Directory of C:\IE7\

07/25/2005? 08:00 PM? ? ? ? ?  217,600 actxprxy.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 61,440 admparse.dll

07/25/2005? 08:00 PM? ? ? ? ?  111,104 advpack.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  139,264 asctrls.ocx

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ?  1,022,976 browseui.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 15,360 corpol.dll

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ?  134,656 dhtmled.ocx

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 86,528 digest.dll

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ?  186,368 duser.dll

07/25/2005? 08:00 PM? ? ? ? ?  361,984 dxtmsft.dll

07/25/2005? 08:00 PM? ? ? ? ?  200,192 dxtrans.dll

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ?  239,104 extmgr.dll

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 39,936 hmmapi.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  427,520 html.iec

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 22,528 ie4uinit.exe

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  143,360 ieakeng.dll

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ?  118,460 ieakmmc.chm

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  221,184 ieaksie.dll

07/25/2005? 09:46 AM? ? ? ? ?  221,184 ieakui.dll

07/07/2005? 02:37 PM? ? ? ?  1,211,624 ieapfltr.dat

07/25/2005? 09:47 AM? ? ? ? ?  328,192 ieapfltr.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  323,584 iedkcs32.dll

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 48,640 iedw.exe

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 82,432 ieencode.dll

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 12,761 ieeula.chm

07/25/2005? 08:01 PM? ? ? ?  5,263,360 ieframe.dll

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 12,013 ieos.chm

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ?  257,024 iepeers.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  2,762 iereset.inf

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 62,976 iernonce.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 62,464 iesetup.dll

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 35,774 ieshared.chm

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 30,148 iesupp.chm

07/25/2005? 09:48 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 25,032 ieuinit.inf

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 12,108 iewebhlp.chm

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ?  204,810 iexplore.chm

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ?  496,640 iexplore.exe

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 39,424 imgutil.dll

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ?  576,512 inetcpl.cpl

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 97,280 inseng.dll

07/25/2005? 09:50 AM? ? ? ? ? ?  1,388 install.ins

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 44,544 jgaw400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ?  167,936 jgdw400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 35,840 jgmd400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 42,496 jgpl400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 45,568 jgsd400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 65,536 jgsh400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 47,952 jobexec.dll

07/25/2005? 08:00 PM? ? ? ? ?  450,560 jscript.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 17,408 jsproxy.dll

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 22,528 licmgr10.dll

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 41,984 mshta.exe

07/25/2005? 08:02 PM? ? ? ?  3,068,928 mshtml.dll

07/25/2005? 09:44 AM? ? ? ?  1,350,656 mshtml.tlb

07/25/2005? 08:01 PM? ? ? ? ?  452,608 mshtmled.dll

07/25/2005? 09:48 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 56,832 mshtmler.dll

06/29/2005? 01:39 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 69,632 msr2c.dll

06/29/2005? 01:39 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  7,168 msr2cenu.dll

07/25/2005? 08:01 PM? ? ? ? ?  200,192 msrating.dll

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ?  536,576 mstime.dll

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ?  227,328 occache.dll

07/25/2005? 08:01 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 47,104 pngfilt.dll

06/29/2005? 11:12 AM? ? ? ? ? ?  3,167 rsaci.rat

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ?  1,489,920 shdocvw.dll

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ?  471,040 shlwapi.dll

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 13,536 spmsg.dll

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ?  209,632 spuninst.exe

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 22,752 spupdsvc.exe

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 64,000 tdc.ocx

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 13,469 tip.htm

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  1,045 tips.gif

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ?  158,208 triedit.dll

07/28/2005? 08:43 AM? ? <DIR>? ? ? ? ? update

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 38,400 url.dll

07/25/2005? 08:02 PM? ? ? ? ?  789,504 urlmon.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  857,088 vgx.dll

07/26/2005? 07:02 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 49,152 wdigest.dll

07/25/2005? 08:02 PM? ? ? ? ?  245,248 webcheck.dll

07/25/2005? 08:02 PM? ? ? ? ?  625,152 wininet.dll

07/25/2005? 08:02 PM? ? ? ? ?  180,736 xmlrw.dll

06/30/2005? 01:08 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 29,444 xpblkpop.wav

06/29/2005? 01:59 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  8,636 xpfeeddisc.wav

06/30/2005? 01:08 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 20,336 xpinfbar.wav

? ? ? ? ? ? ? 83 File(s)? ?  25,447,537 bytes

Directory of C:\IE7\update

07/17/2005? 12:17 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 11,326 eula.txt

07/26/2005? 10:43 PM? ? ? ? ?  182,447 ie7beta1.cat

07/25/2005? 10:31 AM? ? ? ? ?  621,544 iecustom.dll

06/29/2005? 01:39 PM? ? ? ? ? ? ?  781 iecustom.dll.manifest

07/26/2005? 07:10 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  9,798 kb904942.cat

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ?  308,488 legitlib.dll

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ?  718,048 update.exe

06/29/2005? 01:39 PM? ? ? ? ? ? ?  781 update.exe.manifest

07/26/2005? 10:05 PM? ? ? ?  1,001,464 update.inf

07/26/2005? 10:59 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  6,015 update.ver

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ?  371,936 updspapi.dll

? ? ? ? ? ? ? 11 File(s)? ? ? 3,232,628 bytes

? ?  Total Files Listed:

? ? ? ? ? ? ? 94 File(s)? ?  28,680,165 bytes

? ? ? ? ? ? ?  5 Dir(s)? ?  539,615,232 bytes free

Grand Master

NeoXY

Posted
Posted

ok, let's get something stright here...

many of your complains about the GUI and how you can't move it because it's locked down. MICROSOFT DID IT FOR A REASON. The reason they did this is so if the browser do (god forbit) get spyware infested, it will not take over the places of those default toolbars!

Now you're learned something, stop b!tch!ng and live with it.

Collaborator

fanboynz

Posted
Posted
haha

firefox has just had its ass kicked!

This pwns!

IE7 is ausome!

586283401[/snapback]

oh yes, we're so doomed... the IE7 beta wouldnt even come close to the pre-releases of firefox 1.0. And by looking at the acid2 test, we can see Web standards support isnt a priority for MS either.

post-46581-1122553340.png

Grand Master

Axel

Posted
Posted
i think some people are just too stupid!

i asked for a simplified version of the /quiet/passive method and the guy gives me a hex offset BS!

someone just give the simplest , step by step approach

w-k

586285623[/snapback]

That method worked fine for me. If you don't understand it then maybe you shouldn't be trying to test beta software ;)

Grand Master

NeoXY

Posted
Posted

I don't know if some of you noticed this little cool trick MS put in is at the last tab (your most right hand side) there is a tiny square extending from that tab and when you click on it, a new one comes up?..;)

and btw...it looks like Safari..not firefox..:laugh:

Grand Master

Storm

Posted
Posted
oh yes, we're so doomed... the IE7 beta wouldnt even come close to the pre-releases of  firefox 1.0. And by looking at the acid2 test, we can see Web standards support isnt a priority for MS either.

post-46581-1122553340.png

586285662[/snapback]

hmm no

this is much better than firefox, and thats coming from a firefox fan, ive used it for a few years and loved it, now this just takes over.

And its a beta, probably not much different from the IE6 engine, by the final the standards will be fixed :p

Grand Master

.weir

Posted
Posted
ok, let's get something stright here...

many of your complains about the GUI and how you can't move it because it's locked down. MICROSOFT DID IT FOR A REASON. The reason they did this is so if the browser do (god forbit) get spyware infested, it will not take over the places of those default toolbars!

Now you're learned something, stop b!tch!ng and live with it.

586285655[/snapback]

Which is exactly why I don't like it. I haven't had any issue with any form of malware in prob close to 2 years, and there's no reason I would by switching to IE, that's why I find it frustrating to use a browers I can't control.

I realize that this is going to be a great thing for prob 90% of computer users, those who wouldn't know better (read: n00bs) but for those of use who know what we're doing (almost every member on this forum minus the influx recent n00bs all excited about the Vista beta) we're smart enough to avoid that junk. I gotta stop being so hard on new people, sorry new people.

I'll recommend this to friends and family that don't know how to do much more than check email and play solitaire when it goes final, but personally, I'd rather have something I have more control over, so I've uninstalled it and gone back to FF. If things change or some reg hacks are found to get control of the interface, I may use it again someday as I'd prefer to have just one browser instead of 2, but I'll live for now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By ikjadoon · Posted

      It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By ikjadoon · Posted

      Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By ikjadoon · Posted

      I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By ikjadoon · Posted

      It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Euro-Office must default to ODF to be considered "genuinely European", LibreOffice argues

      By Danielx64 · Posted

      Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!