Recommended Posts

Is this pretty much correct?

Directory of C:\IE7\

07/25/2005? 08:00 PM? ? ? ? ?  217,600 actxprxy.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 61,440 admparse.dll

07/25/2005? 08:00 PM? ? ? ? ?  111,104 advpack.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  139,264 asctrls.ocx

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ?  1,022,976 browseui.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 15,360 corpol.dll

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ?  134,656 dhtmled.ocx

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 86,528 digest.dll

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ?  186,368 duser.dll

07/25/2005? 08:00 PM? ? ? ? ?  361,984 dxtmsft.dll

07/25/2005? 08:00 PM? ? ? ? ?  200,192 dxtrans.dll

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ?  239,104 extmgr.dll

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 39,936 hmmapi.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  427,520 html.iec

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 22,528 ie4uinit.exe

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  143,360 ieakeng.dll

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ?  118,460 ieakmmc.chm

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  221,184 ieaksie.dll

07/25/2005? 09:46 AM? ? ? ? ?  221,184 ieakui.dll

07/07/2005? 02:37 PM? ? ? ?  1,211,624 ieapfltr.dat

07/25/2005? 09:47 AM? ? ? ? ?  328,192 ieapfltr.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  323,584 iedkcs32.dll

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 48,640 iedw.exe

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 82,432 ieencode.dll

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 12,761 ieeula.chm

07/25/2005? 08:01 PM? ? ? ?  5,263,360 ieframe.dll

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 12,013 ieos.chm

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ?  257,024 iepeers.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  2,762 iereset.inf

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 62,976 iernonce.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 62,464 iesetup.dll

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 35,774 ieshared.chm

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 30,148 iesupp.chm

07/25/2005? 09:48 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 25,032 ieuinit.inf

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 12,108 iewebhlp.chm

06/29/2005? 11:11 AM? ? ? ? ?  204,810 iexplore.chm

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ?  496,640 iexplore.exe

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 39,424 imgutil.dll

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ?  576,512 inetcpl.cpl

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 97,280 inseng.dll

07/25/2005? 09:50 AM? ? ? ? ? ?  1,388 install.ins

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 44,544 jgaw400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ?  167,936 jgdw400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 35,840 jgmd400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 42,496 jgpl400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 45,568 jgsd400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 65,536 jgsh400.dll

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 47,952 jobexec.dll

07/25/2005? 08:00 PM? ? ? ? ?  450,560 jscript.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 17,408 jsproxy.dll

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 22,528 licmgr10.dll

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 41,984 mshta.exe

07/25/2005? 08:02 PM? ? ? ?  3,068,928 mshtml.dll

07/25/2005? 09:44 AM? ? ? ?  1,350,656 mshtml.tlb

07/25/2005? 08:01 PM? ? ? ? ?  452,608 mshtmled.dll

07/25/2005? 09:48 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 56,832 mshtmler.dll

06/29/2005? 01:39 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 69,632 msr2c.dll

06/29/2005? 01:39 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  7,168 msr2cenu.dll

07/25/2005? 08:01 PM? ? ? ? ?  200,192 msrating.dll

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ?  536,576 mstime.dll

07/25/2005? 09:51 AM? ? ? ? ?  227,328 occache.dll

07/25/2005? 08:01 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 47,104 pngfilt.dll

06/29/2005? 11:12 AM? ? ? ? ? ?  3,167 rsaci.rat

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ?  1,489,920 shdocvw.dll

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ?  471,040 shlwapi.dll

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 13,536 spmsg.dll

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ?  209,632 spuninst.exe

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 22,752 spupdsvc.exe

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 64,000 tdc.ocx

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 13,469 tip.htm

06/29/2005? 01:43 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  1,045 tips.gif

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ?  158,208 triedit.dll

07/28/2005? 08:43 AM? ? <DIR>? ? ? ? ? update

07/25/2005? 09:52 AM? ? ? ? ? ? 38,400 url.dll

07/25/2005? 08:02 PM? ? ? ? ?  789,504 urlmon.dll

07/25/2005? 09:53 AM? ? ? ? ?  857,088 vgx.dll

07/26/2005? 07:02 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 49,152 wdigest.dll

07/25/2005? 08:02 PM? ? ? ? ?  245,248 webcheck.dll

07/25/2005? 08:02 PM? ? ? ? ?  625,152 wininet.dll

07/25/2005? 08:02 PM? ? ? ? ?  180,736 xmlrw.dll

06/30/2005? 01:08 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 29,444 xpblkpop.wav

06/29/2005? 01:59 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  8,636 xpfeeddisc.wav

06/30/2005? 01:08 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 20,336 xpinfbar.wav

? ? ? ? ? ? ? 83 File(s)? ?  25,447,537 bytes

Directory of C:\IE7\update

07/17/2005? 12:17 PM? ? ? ? ? ? 11,326 eula.txt

07/26/2005? 10:43 PM? ? ? ? ?  182,447 ie7beta1.cat

07/25/2005? 10:31 AM? ? ? ? ?  621,544 iecustom.dll

06/29/2005? 01:39 PM? ? ? ? ? ? ?  781 iecustom.dll.manifest

07/26/2005? 07:10 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  9,798 kb904942.cat

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ?  308,488 legitlib.dll

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ?  718,048 update.exe

06/29/2005? 01:39 PM? ? ? ? ? ? ?  781 update.exe.manifest

07/26/2005? 10:05 PM? ? ? ?  1,001,464 update.inf

07/26/2005? 10:59 PM? ? ? ? ? ?  6,015 update.ver

07/07/2005? 10:42 AM? ? ? ? ?  371,936 updspapi.dll

? ? ? ? ? ? ? 11 File(s)? ? ? 3,232,628 bytes

? ?  Total Files Listed:

? ? ? ? ? ? ? 94 File(s)? ?  28,680,165 bytes

? ? ? ? ? ? ?  5 Dir(s)? ?  539,615,232 bytes free

ok, let's get something stright here...

many of your complains about the GUI and how you can't move it because it's locked down. MICROSOFT DID IT FOR A REASON. The reason they did this is so if the browser do (god forbit) get spyware infested, it will not take over the places of those default toolbars!

Now you're learned something, stop b!tch!ng and live with it.

haha

firefox has just had its ass kicked!

This pwns!

IE7 is ausome!

586283401[/snapback]

oh yes, we're so doomed... the IE7 beta wouldnt even come close to the pre-releases of firefox 1.0. And by looking at the acid2 test, we can see Web standards support isnt a priority for MS either.

post-46581-1122553340.png

i think some people are just too stupid!

i asked for a simplified version of the /quiet/passive method and the guy gives me a hex offset BS!

someone just give the simplest , step by step approach

w-k

586285623[/snapback]

That method worked fine for me. If you don't understand it then maybe you shouldn't be trying to test beta software ;)

I don't know if some of you noticed this little cool trick MS put in is at the last tab (your most right hand side) there is a tiny square extending from that tab and when you click on it, a new one comes up?..;)

and btw...it looks like Safari..not firefox..:laugh:

oh yes, we're so doomed... the IE7 beta wouldnt even come close to the pre-releases of  firefox 1.0. And by looking at the acid2 test, we can see Web standards support isnt a priority for MS either.

post-46581-1122553340.png

586285662[/snapback]

hmm no

this is much better than firefox, and thats coming from a firefox fan, ive used it for a few years and loved it, now this just takes over.

And its a beta, probably not much different from the IE6 engine, by the final the standards will be fixed :p

ok, let's get something stright here...

many of your complains about the GUI and how you can't move it because it's locked down. MICROSOFT DID IT FOR A REASON. The reason they did this is so if the browser do (god forbit) get spyware infested, it will not take over the places of those default toolbars!

Now you're learned something, stop b!tch!ng and live with it.

586285655[/snapback]

Which is exactly why I don't like it. I haven't had any issue with any form of malware in prob close to 2 years, and there's no reason I would by switching to IE, that's why I find it frustrating to use a browers I can't control.

I realize that this is going to be a great thing for prob 90% of computer users, those who wouldn't know better (read: n00bs) but for those of use who know what we're doing (almost every member on this forum minus the influx recent n00bs all excited about the Vista beta) we're smart enough to avoid that junk. I gotta stop being so hard on new people, sorry new people.

I'll recommend this to friends and family that don't know how to do much more than check email and play solitaire when it goes final, but personally, I'd rather have something I have more control over, so I've uninstalled it and gone back to FF. If things change or some reg hacks are found to get control of the interface, I may use it again someday as I'd prefer to have just one browser instead of 2, but I'll live for now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
    • OpenAI is making Codex more useful in Chrome and the cloud by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI's Codex now has more than 5 million users, up nearly 4x from earlier this year. To further accelerate Codex's growth among developers, OpenAI today announced that it has agreed to acquire Ona, a company that builds secure cloud execution and orchestration technology for developers. Ona will enable developers to run Codex with persistent and controlled cloud infrastructure for long-running agentic workflows. Right now, most Codex execution happens locally on developers' laptops and PCs, and the agents work continuously for hours. Through Ona, OpenAI aims to make Codex agents keep working for days without being tied to a user’s local machine or an active session. This will be an important capability for enterprises that want to deploy AI agents in production while maintaining control over infrastructure, data, security boundaries, credential scope, logging, and review workflows. Like any acquisition, the deal is still subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Until the deal closes, OpenAI and Ona will continue to operate as separate companies. After closing, Ona’s team will join the Codex team to improve developer workflows. Alongside the Ona acquisition announcement, OpenAI today introduced a few Codex updates. Developers can now save Codex rate limit resets and use them later instead of losing them when they are not needed immediately. OpenAI is also adding a referral option where users can invite a friend to Codex and get a saved rate limit reset. OpenAI today also announced a developer mode for browser use in Chrome and the Codex in-app browser. With this mode, Codex can use the Chrome DevTools Protocol to debug web apps, inspect pages, and work more directly with browser-based development workflows. Developers can use this when they want Codex to profile JavaScript, inspect console output and network traffic, examine web page states including the DOM and applied styles, and more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      186
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!