Recommended Posts

thats just like saying in factory tests this ford taurus has more horse power than a jaguar.....its like...so what? as long as my car is sleek and QUIET and you dont have to stop every five minutes to let your car cool down on the street in the REAL world and not according to some test

so what? what is a benchmark? to brag?

when you surf neowin/play a game with a processor over 1.5 ghz does it really matter? seriously....what is a benchmark?

i thought so.

benchmarks seem to be all you amd owners are about...thats it..now if you sat side by side with a friend and opened an application and it actually opened 3 seconds faster then that would be something to think about...but come on ...its a number...you can hold your cool numbers up all you want...

while i will be sitting back with a nice cool stable quality processor not caring that some program spits out numbers at me saying yup this one is faster than that one by 400 points! OMG cause for havoc.

Originally posted by ziddey

now its 133mhz (133x4=533). but thing is so is athlon (133x2=266:()

however duron (100x2=200)!!

still get a 1.6a (16x100=1600) and run at 2.13g(16x133=2133)

The p4s are still 100mhz bus you just wrote. The newer ones do operate on the 133mhz bus but that's 133 compared to AMDs 266? Get my point. the p4s use a multiplier higer than 13 to get speeds that high, not the FSB. (still get a 1.6a (16x100=1600 ) see...

Originally posted by hobsgrg

AMD are cheaper as well, so if some benchmarks dont persuade you then the price should.

olk then thats better.....that actually matters

PRICE people.

now if i were on a budget or if you are on a budget then go for an AMD.

i have no problem recommending it to people on a budget cause they are budget processors designed specifically to try and outclass the higher priced ones at any cost.

but dont go expecting to have a perfect computing experience because chances are you will run into one problem or another and i dont mean software related.

Originally posted by hobsgrg

Freeza what are u trying to say? The P4 actually executes LESS instructions per clock cycle than a P3, it just plain sucks

wow you amd people are really loyal........ you must turn your head when Toms Hardware makes a new AMD vs P4 and just read your old edition AMD vs P4 that you saved on your harddrive because it said your chip was better.

The new Pentium 4s with the 533mhz FSB are said to be faster than AMD's chips, it is like overclocking but it is certified so the whole system runs faster.

I am very happy with my system, i have the origional P4 1.7 and it is 1 year old now. it has been running with no problems, and runs great with all games. my friend has Athlon xp and his system freezes all the time. my system is probably as fast as i need it to be and i haven't even overclocked it yet. the chip i have is said to be overclocked to 2.3ghz without watercooling.

Amd might be cheaper, but P4 RDRAM ROX! and with the new FSB AMD is stuck behind Intel until they make their die size smaller or release the clawhammer.

go P4 =)

Originally posted by freeza

damn right :D

and when the pentium 4 beats an AMD people are still in denial...either that or they say

"of course it does look at how many more mhz it has"....just admit that it won and move on

yeah, reminds me of the linux community that are so damn loyal to it and deny any thing that is right w/ windows (there may not be much, but there are some). :D

I can only say this:

My last CPU was a T-Bird 1.3GHz. It ran at 60C with the case closed and I had a VIA chipset that didnt allow my Gf2 to operate with fast writes because of tearing errors in Windows. It was hot and XP just had "issues" with Via chipsets/SBLive

I bought a P4 1.6GHz recently and a dearer Intel i845 chipset and DDR ram and Im glad I did, the CPU now operates at 30C (max) allows fast writes and feels more stable overal.

My 2 cents.

Originally posted by freeza

damn right :D

and when the pentium 4 beats an AMD people are still in denial...either that or they say

"of course it does look at how many more mhz it has"....just admit that it won and move on

Well im a struggling computer science university student so price is paramount for me, but i haven't had any problems with AMD chips and i've been using them since the K6-3, ahhh those were the days, lol. So i'll admit to being a die-hard AMD fan

Originally posted by SHoTTa35

The p4s are still 100mhz bus you just wrote. The newer ones do operate on the 133mhz bus but that's 133 compared to AMDs 266? Get my point. the p4s use a multiplier higer than 13 to get speeds that high, not the FSB. (still get a 1.6a (16x100=1600 ) see...

you have quite misinterpreted both me and amd. amd is not the god that you speak of!!!

intel has qdr much like amd has ddr. amd does multipliers the same exact way!

see? even the chief is agreeing

cody: yeah....its people that are so loyal that they refuse to see whats right in front of them.

i can admit that the athlon "XP" processor beat intel in "benchmarks" but none of that matters to me..no matter how much any one of them wins i will still be an intel advocate until AMD beefs up the quality of their work to me.

but since everyone is all about benchmarks when the intel processor finally wins....even with benchmarks....they're still in denial. or bring up some other points to justify the win other than they just won....get over it.

Originally posted by Neobond

I can only say this:

My last CPU was a T-Bird 1.3GHz. It ran at 60C with the case closed and I had a VIA chipset that didnt allow my Gf2 to operate with fast writes because of tearing errors in Windows. It was hot and XP just had "issues" with Via chipsets/SBLive

I bought a P4 1.6GHz recently and a dearer Intel i845 chipset and DDR ram and Im glad I did, the CPU now operates at 30C (max) allows fast writes and feels more stable overal.

My 2 cents.

omfg well said. I LOVE YOU MAN!!!

too bad im still stuck with a via and have to turn off fw. :(

ok, i'll just read from now on.... ;) these AMD vs Intel threads are gonna go nuts. One person just go which should i get, AMD or Intel and we all go nuts. I guess he was looking for our opinions tho so there you go.... see what you did!:mad: ;)

/edit

oh wait... crap!

Happy 2000th Post SHoTTa35!!!!

WHo Hoo! Pary At SHoTTa's house! Bring the liquor!!

hehe, no 13yr olds ;)

lol SHoTTa35 :D anyways I had a AMD XP 1900 which never worked out for me, so I returned it n got my money back n got my P4 2Ghz for the same price since my uncles a reseller :) and ever since I got it I love it, more stable than anything I've ever had :D all I want now is a better vid card and I'm set :) and maybe some RD ram :D

Why is it that every processor-related thread will have half the posts from Freeza, yet he sits and degrades others for sticking up for what they prefer? Maybe he thinks the more he sees himself, the more he'll probably believe what he's saying, who knows. All I know is, it's pretty annoying. Whatever, anyways...

Get whatever you want. The performance thing is allmost a non-issue anymore, you just gotta know what's best for each platform type. AMD/Via can be finicky w/ certain hardware. Intel is famous for stability. Pick whichever you want. It's not really that big of a decision.

And to all the little fanboys (ie; Freeza); shut up already. I own both platforms *right now*. I can't see much difference. Maybe because I'm not sitting around running benchmarks and actually *using* my systems for something. :right:

Originally posted by Initial 2k2

Okay, Im realllllly decisive here on wheather I want an AMD, or a Pentium4.. Pentium has always been the first to get higher chip speeds, and has been around for 30 + years.. AMD has been around for 2-3 years, and has always been behind... Not saying they're bad, I use a Duron 1.2, and yet its JUST below my benchs on my P4 1.5..

But, with these insanely high bus speeds coming up, 800 Mhz FSB, vs the 266 bus, cmon.. Thats an INSANE difference there...

Pentiums can be easily overclocked as well from what I hear.. the 1.6a reaching 2.9 with water cooling.. 2.7 with Volcano 7+.. 2.4 with Stock coolers.. Cmon, its crazy.. I mean, I have 2 AMD computers and 2 Pentium computers..

AMD k6-2 533mhz

AMD k7 Duron 1200mhz

Pentium 3 800mhz

Pentium 4 1500mhz

I really love AMD, and yet I really love intel.. The prices may be a little higher, but in actuality, you get what you paid for, and you get higher frequencys.. Can I get some opinions here on whether what I should buy?

You must be smoking crack cos first of all Intel has not been making pentium chips for 30+ years, and amd has been around a hell of a lot longer than 2-3 years and for most of the years they have actually been up to par with Intel if not faster.

I'm sure you would be perfectly fine with a p4 :roll:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!