Recommended Posts

Me personally I have both highend machines. I have a AMD 2100 and a Intel 2.53. Well lets just say the AMD was the biggest waste of money. The machine always runs hotter then intel, intel I have it overclocked to 2900 mhz it just kills my AMD even when its not overclocked. I hate AMD I gave the damn thing to the wife and all she says its not as fast playing games and crap oh well Thats just me, everyone has their own opinon. As for AMD I will never buy one again!

Originally posted by Initial 2k2

Wot does Level 1 Cache signify? I know this so far..

AMD Athlon XP

L1 Cache = 128 KB

L2 Cache = 256 KB

Intel Pentium 4

L1 Cache = 8 KB

L2 Cache = 512 KB

What EXACTLY does the cache in the chip REALLY do? I know more L2 Cache = fast motherfuker and stuff =p

http://www.pcguide.com/ref/cpu/arch/int/co...ompCache-c.html

Originally posted by Wickedkitten

lmao tom's hardware already got their asses busted from that "video" where the heatsink falls off a thunderbird that got proven to be a joke. Tom's got his head up Intel's ass anyways and an Intel Inside tattoo over his ######. You never ****in see him say anything postive about amd and every single benchmark he's ever done has them always beating amd. "ooh we managed to dig out this old intel 486 dx 33mhz system and guess what? We pit it against an athlon xp 2200 and it won!"

LOL SOOOOOO True! I sware intel pays off tomshardware cuz i did my own benchmarks on my own athlon XP 2000+ and it was whoopin the P4 2.4 GHZ and fell just shy of the 2.53!! Nice try tom but u can't trick me :)

Thanks for the link.. I understand it a little more in detail, but it doesnt tell about the others like L2 , L3, etc.

Btw, what will be the next owning processor?

Clawhammer/Sledgehammer

or Prescott?

I beleive Prescott will be.. I've barely read anyhting on the new chips.. all I know is that Prescott will have a 200 quad pumped bus (800 mhz bus) and like a 1mb cache.. I hope it doesnt require much voltage.. XTREME OVERCLOCKING BABY!

I have a dual 1800+ amd.. i love it.. i have many other computers.. all amd.. they all beat there comparitive Intel counterparts.. what i mean is same freq.. equals a no no for intel.

Money was not an issue with more. But i still went for AMD. WHy? because i belive that supporting AMD will keep the competition running and having intel keep on pumping out faster cpus. Tell me. If there was no competition agianst intel or maybe agianst AMD. would they release new cpu's? We would still be stuck at around 533mhz which is i think about the time intel got some seriers competiton. please forgive me with spelling. i want to sleep yet i can't pass up the oppurtunity to throw in my opionion. btw... the next batch of systems i build will be Intel. Why? because its fun. Its not really about wow i can run Quake 3 2fps or even 10fps faster. Its about how i actully fragged you. Its not that i can complete a Seti@home work unit in 3hours. Its that i can have Seti@home dedicated.

I remember when i used to put down intel at every change i could get. Its not possible anymore. When my friends ask me what they should get i ask them, what are they going to do with the system. I mean .. just simple stuff.. heck go for an iMac :p

But in all terms i would go with AMD currently. Maybe a 1800+ or something with 1 gig of ram. GeForce4 4600 and Epox 83KA+ or something like that.. can't remember exact model number. And a nice lian li case.

Originally posted by Chris123NT

I just have to say that power users use AMD and people who are not very experienced use intel (Kinda how i see it) ;)

true dat, heh

Most amd users have probably built their own computers.. not saying Intel users can't build. Just saying that i see a more majoirty of users that use AMD having built their computer and a more majority of users who use intel having purchased from Dell and the likes.

Majority

Mojo

heh looks funny

Originally posted by Chris123NT

I just have to say that power users use AMD and people who are not very experienced use intel (Kinda how i see it) ;)

Not really man, I'm a power user and I'm experienced, and I use Intel. But I use it b/c for me its more reliable and I got it for a good price too, but if AMD's could fix their heat issues (b/c I don't want having a loud ass HSF jus to cool it, and cuz it makes my whole room hotter than it is) then I would consider getting an AMD system for my self but since its not fixed yet, and I had to many problems with it I jus dropped the idea of having AMD and went with Intel again.

With all the talk of a few extra 3d marks, pcmarks, fps whatever; you seem to have neglected other important issues (for me anyway) such as stabilty, noise levels etc.

I have to admit to never even seeing an AMD chip in action so I'm not going to pass comment on which I think is better, but I've used a P4 machine running at 2.2GHz and it was virtually silent.

I suppose it doesn't really matter if all you're gonna be doing is playing games, but for a PC I'd rather work on, it would need to be silent.

I won't bring my G4 chip and it's silent operation into it ;)

Originally posted by Dazzla

With all the talk of a few extra 3d marks, pcmarks, fps whatever; you seem to have neglected other important issues (for me anyway) such as stabilty, noise levels etc.

I have to admit to never even seeing an AMD chip in action so I'm not going to pass comment on which I think is better, but I've used a P4 machine running at 2.2GHz and it was virtually silent.

I suppose it doesn't really matter if all you're gonna be doing is playing games, but for a PC I'd rather work on, it would need to be silent.

I won't bring my G4 chip and it's silent operation into it ;)

Since when do CPUs make noise? :ponder:

Just get a good fan.. I have an AMD XP 1.53Ghz and an Intel P4 1.8Ghz, they both use nice and quite fans.. no noise factor. FYI... both chips are nice and stable... I am not sure which is better for overclocking though.

Originally posted by KayMan2K

Since when do CPUs make noise? :ponder:

Just get a good fan.. I have an AMD XP 1.53Ghz and an Intel P4 1.8Ghz, they both use nice and quite fans.. no noise factor. FYI... both chips are nice and stable... I am not sure which is better for overclocking though.

Lol, you know what I meant. The PC I was using was a stock compaq one so the cooling was the bog standard crap they put in. I opened the case and it was a tiny fan not worthy of anything.

But it done the job, I'm wondering would the same fan be as useful on an AMD chip? Of all the people I've talked to who own AMD and Intel (including reading this thread), it' that the general consensus is that Intel chips operate at a lower temp, therefore not requiring the sound of a 747 taking off every time you start your PC...

OK, so AMD has heat issues...not a big deal. In my mind the reason the AMD is hotter is because it's actually doing more work. The Intel chips do a pretty good job but they stay cooler cuz they do less work. That's just how i see it. I've built about 4 AMD system and 1 Intel system because the person was brainwashed by those commercials. Now they wish they had gone AMD cuz they come over and use my computer and mine is much faster (According to him) than his 1.8GHz P4. I guess it's all just the quality of the components you use when building any system but i went AMD at a t-bird 750Mhz and never went back to Intel after coming from a P3 866mhz. The AMD was faster using the same components except MOBO and Processor.

Don't tell me i'm wrong cuz of my opinion. I don't think you guys are wrong either. But so many different people can't be wrong about AMDs being good tho. Maybe an AMD 2200+ doesn't beat an 2.53Ghz Northwood but hey, they aren't in the same class so you can't compare them. One is .18 and one is .13 (which is another reason it runs cooler).

Oh and about the fans, skrew all all.. hehe, i like fans they are soothing! I can't sleep without a fan so these case fans add to the purr in my room.

hehe.. :)

Originally posted by SHoTTa35

OK, so AMD has heat issues...not a big deal. In my mind the reason the AMD is hotter is because it's actually doing more work. The Intel chips do a pretty good job but they stay cooler cuz they do less work. That's just how i see it. I've built about 4 AMD system and 1 Intel system because the person was brainwashed by those commercials. Now they wish they had gone AMD cuz they come over and use my computer and mine is much faster (According to him) than his 1.8GHz P4. I guess it's all just the quality of the components you use when building any system but i went AMD at a t-bird 750Mhz and never went back to Intel after coming from a P3 866mhz. The AMD was faster using the same components except MOBO and Processor.

Don't tell me i'm wrong cuz of my opinion. I don't think you guys are wrong either. But so many different people can't be wrong about AMDs being good tho. Maybe an AMD 2200+ doesn't beat an 2.53Ghz Northwood but hey, they aren't in the same class so you can't compare them. One is .18 and one is .13 (which is another reason it runs cooler).

Oh and about the fans, skrew all all.. hehe, i like fans they are soothing! I can't sleep without a fan so these case fans add to the purr in my room.

hehe.. :)

Nicely said man. I went P4 there for a while after my tbird 1.4 blew then i decided to give AMD another go (sold p4 to my brother) and man was i glad i did that! This thing runs great! :)

Originally posted by username

i still dont get off where people say "AMD has heat issues", if you build a system to AMDs spec, you will not have problems

That's what I'm trying to ask. Does the AMD spec cooling consists of a greater amount of cooling then the Intel spec?

Originally posted by Dazzla

That's what I'm trying to ask. Does the AMD spec cooling consists of a greater amount of cooling then the Intel spec?

no, both CPUs produce the same amount of watts, its just a lot of people build custom AMD systems and use a cheaper heatsink and poor case airflow, you cant cool a cpu good when your case temp is in the 40Cs

unless you are that one guy here who magically has a P4 running at 21C and a case temp at 36C

Originally posted by username

no, both CPUs produce the same amount of watts, its just a lot of people build custom AMD systems and use a cheaper heatsink and poor case airflow, you cant cool a cpu good when your case temp is in the 40Cs

Ok, that's cool. It's just that reading this thread, someone like me who doesn't build PC's would think different.

I'm seeing temps all over the net of like 20-30 on P4's and temps of 30-60 on AMD's.

Originally posted by Dazzla

I'm seeing temps all over the net of like 20-30 on P4's and temps of 30-60 on AMD's.

oh the temperature that is reported is lower in the P4s, but they dont run as high as the Athlons either, P4s top out around 50C and Athlons at 60C, so its all with the numbers

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!