Recommended Posts

Me personally I have both highend machines. I have a AMD 2100 and a Intel 2.53. Well lets just say the AMD was the biggest waste of money. The machine always runs hotter then intel, intel I have it overclocked to 2900 mhz it just kills my AMD even when its not overclocked. I hate AMD I gave the damn thing to the wife and all she says its not as fast playing games and crap oh well Thats just me, everyone has their own opinon. As for AMD I will never buy one again!

Originally posted by Initial 2k2

Wot does Level 1 Cache signify? I know this so far..

AMD Athlon XP

L1 Cache = 128 KB

L2 Cache = 256 KB

Intel Pentium 4

L1 Cache = 8 KB

L2 Cache = 512 KB

What EXACTLY does the cache in the chip REALLY do? I know more L2 Cache = fast motherfuker and stuff =p

http://www.pcguide.com/ref/cpu/arch/int/co...ompCache-c.html

Originally posted by Wickedkitten

lmao tom's hardware already got their asses busted from that "video" where the heatsink falls off a thunderbird that got proven to be a joke. Tom's got his head up Intel's ass anyways and an Intel Inside tattoo over his ######. You never ****in see him say anything postive about amd and every single benchmark he's ever done has them always beating amd. "ooh we managed to dig out this old intel 486 dx 33mhz system and guess what? We pit it against an athlon xp 2200 and it won!"

LOL SOOOOOO True! I sware intel pays off tomshardware cuz i did my own benchmarks on my own athlon XP 2000+ and it was whoopin the P4 2.4 GHZ and fell just shy of the 2.53!! Nice try tom but u can't trick me :)

Thanks for the link.. I understand it a little more in detail, but it doesnt tell about the others like L2 , L3, etc.

Btw, what will be the next owning processor?

Clawhammer/Sledgehammer

or Prescott?

I beleive Prescott will be.. I've barely read anyhting on the new chips.. all I know is that Prescott will have a 200 quad pumped bus (800 mhz bus) and like a 1mb cache.. I hope it doesnt require much voltage.. XTREME OVERCLOCKING BABY!

I have a dual 1800+ amd.. i love it.. i have many other computers.. all amd.. they all beat there comparitive Intel counterparts.. what i mean is same freq.. equals a no no for intel.

Money was not an issue with more. But i still went for AMD. WHy? because i belive that supporting AMD will keep the competition running and having intel keep on pumping out faster cpus. Tell me. If there was no competition agianst intel or maybe agianst AMD. would they release new cpu's? We would still be stuck at around 533mhz which is i think about the time intel got some seriers competiton. please forgive me with spelling. i want to sleep yet i can't pass up the oppurtunity to throw in my opionion. btw... the next batch of systems i build will be Intel. Why? because its fun. Its not really about wow i can run Quake 3 2fps or even 10fps faster. Its about how i actully fragged you. Its not that i can complete a Seti@home work unit in 3hours. Its that i can have Seti@home dedicated.

I remember when i used to put down intel at every change i could get. Its not possible anymore. When my friends ask me what they should get i ask them, what are they going to do with the system. I mean .. just simple stuff.. heck go for an iMac :p

But in all terms i would go with AMD currently. Maybe a 1800+ or something with 1 gig of ram. GeForce4 4600 and Epox 83KA+ or something like that.. can't remember exact model number. And a nice lian li case.

Originally posted by Chris123NT

I just have to say that power users use AMD and people who are not very experienced use intel (Kinda how i see it) ;)

true dat, heh

Most amd users have probably built their own computers.. not saying Intel users can't build. Just saying that i see a more majoirty of users that use AMD having built their computer and a more majority of users who use intel having purchased from Dell and the likes.

Majority

Mojo

heh looks funny

Originally posted by Chris123NT

I just have to say that power users use AMD and people who are not very experienced use intel (Kinda how i see it) ;)

Not really man, I'm a power user and I'm experienced, and I use Intel. But I use it b/c for me its more reliable and I got it for a good price too, but if AMD's could fix their heat issues (b/c I don't want having a loud ass HSF jus to cool it, and cuz it makes my whole room hotter than it is) then I would consider getting an AMD system for my self but since its not fixed yet, and I had to many problems with it I jus dropped the idea of having AMD and went with Intel again.

With all the talk of a few extra 3d marks, pcmarks, fps whatever; you seem to have neglected other important issues (for me anyway) such as stabilty, noise levels etc.

I have to admit to never even seeing an AMD chip in action so I'm not going to pass comment on which I think is better, but I've used a P4 machine running at 2.2GHz and it was virtually silent.

I suppose it doesn't really matter if all you're gonna be doing is playing games, but for a PC I'd rather work on, it would need to be silent.

I won't bring my G4 chip and it's silent operation into it ;)

Originally posted by Dazzla

With all the talk of a few extra 3d marks, pcmarks, fps whatever; you seem to have neglected other important issues (for me anyway) such as stabilty, noise levels etc.

I have to admit to never even seeing an AMD chip in action so I'm not going to pass comment on which I think is better, but I've used a P4 machine running at 2.2GHz and it was virtually silent.

I suppose it doesn't really matter if all you're gonna be doing is playing games, but for a PC I'd rather work on, it would need to be silent.

I won't bring my G4 chip and it's silent operation into it ;)

Since when do CPUs make noise? :ponder:

Just get a good fan.. I have an AMD XP 1.53Ghz and an Intel P4 1.8Ghz, they both use nice and quite fans.. no noise factor. FYI... both chips are nice and stable... I am not sure which is better for overclocking though.

Originally posted by KayMan2K

Since when do CPUs make noise? :ponder:

Just get a good fan.. I have an AMD XP 1.53Ghz and an Intel P4 1.8Ghz, they both use nice and quite fans.. no noise factor. FYI... both chips are nice and stable... I am not sure which is better for overclocking though.

Lol, you know what I meant. The PC I was using was a stock compaq one so the cooling was the bog standard crap they put in. I opened the case and it was a tiny fan not worthy of anything.

But it done the job, I'm wondering would the same fan be as useful on an AMD chip? Of all the people I've talked to who own AMD and Intel (including reading this thread), it' that the general consensus is that Intel chips operate at a lower temp, therefore not requiring the sound of a 747 taking off every time you start your PC...

OK, so AMD has heat issues...not a big deal. In my mind the reason the AMD is hotter is because it's actually doing more work. The Intel chips do a pretty good job but they stay cooler cuz they do less work. That's just how i see it. I've built about 4 AMD system and 1 Intel system because the person was brainwashed by those commercials. Now they wish they had gone AMD cuz they come over and use my computer and mine is much faster (According to him) than his 1.8GHz P4. I guess it's all just the quality of the components you use when building any system but i went AMD at a t-bird 750Mhz and never went back to Intel after coming from a P3 866mhz. The AMD was faster using the same components except MOBO and Processor.

Don't tell me i'm wrong cuz of my opinion. I don't think you guys are wrong either. But so many different people can't be wrong about AMDs being good tho. Maybe an AMD 2200+ doesn't beat an 2.53Ghz Northwood but hey, they aren't in the same class so you can't compare them. One is .18 and one is .13 (which is another reason it runs cooler).

Oh and about the fans, skrew all all.. hehe, i like fans they are soothing! I can't sleep without a fan so these case fans add to the purr in my room.

hehe.. :)

Originally posted by SHoTTa35

OK, so AMD has heat issues...not a big deal. In my mind the reason the AMD is hotter is because it's actually doing more work. The Intel chips do a pretty good job but they stay cooler cuz they do less work. That's just how i see it. I've built about 4 AMD system and 1 Intel system because the person was brainwashed by those commercials. Now they wish they had gone AMD cuz they come over and use my computer and mine is much faster (According to him) than his 1.8GHz P4. I guess it's all just the quality of the components you use when building any system but i went AMD at a t-bird 750Mhz and never went back to Intel after coming from a P3 866mhz. The AMD was faster using the same components except MOBO and Processor.

Don't tell me i'm wrong cuz of my opinion. I don't think you guys are wrong either. But so many different people can't be wrong about AMDs being good tho. Maybe an AMD 2200+ doesn't beat an 2.53Ghz Northwood but hey, they aren't in the same class so you can't compare them. One is .18 and one is .13 (which is another reason it runs cooler).

Oh and about the fans, skrew all all.. hehe, i like fans they are soothing! I can't sleep without a fan so these case fans add to the purr in my room.

hehe.. :)

Nicely said man. I went P4 there for a while after my tbird 1.4 blew then i decided to give AMD another go (sold p4 to my brother) and man was i glad i did that! This thing runs great! :)

Originally posted by username

i still dont get off where people say "AMD has heat issues", if you build a system to AMDs spec, you will not have problems

That's what I'm trying to ask. Does the AMD spec cooling consists of a greater amount of cooling then the Intel spec?

Originally posted by Dazzla

That's what I'm trying to ask. Does the AMD spec cooling consists of a greater amount of cooling then the Intel spec?

no, both CPUs produce the same amount of watts, its just a lot of people build custom AMD systems and use a cheaper heatsink and poor case airflow, you cant cool a cpu good when your case temp is in the 40Cs

unless you are that one guy here who magically has a P4 running at 21C and a case temp at 36C

Originally posted by username

no, both CPUs produce the same amount of watts, its just a lot of people build custom AMD systems and use a cheaper heatsink and poor case airflow, you cant cool a cpu good when your case temp is in the 40Cs

Ok, that's cool. It's just that reading this thread, someone like me who doesn't build PC's would think different.

I'm seeing temps all over the net of like 20-30 on P4's and temps of 30-60 on AMD's.

Originally posted by Dazzla

I'm seeing temps all over the net of like 20-30 on P4's and temps of 30-60 on AMD's.

oh the temperature that is reported is lower in the P4s, but they dont run as high as the Athlons either, P4s top out around 50C and Athlons at 60C, so its all with the numbers

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!