OrangeSoul Share Posted September 19, 2005 Made by Crytek, this is made with Directx 10 API shown at the PDC Microsoft Conference http://s2.putfile.com/videos/26010463625.avi Link to post Share on other sites
rollinup Share Posted September 19, 2005 That looks really good, very impressive! :happy: Link to post Share on other sites
Buttus Share Posted September 19, 2005 whoa! now that is awesome looking! can't wait for a high res version Link to post Share on other sites
djpnuemo Share Posted September 19, 2005 yea, that looks pretty good. definitely want higher res. Link to post Share on other sites
Code.Red Share Posted September 19, 2005 Definately looks great! Hopefully high res version will appear soon. Link to post Share on other sites
jerzdawg Share Posted September 19, 2005 looks really nice... looks like footage from Farcry... the island location... def expect big things from Cryteks next game... Link to post Share on other sites
NeoXY Share Posted September 19, 2005 some still look a bit rough like the fire...the real time destruction was really good but felt a bit rough also however the enviroment and things like soft shadow is very impressive...(Y) Link to post Share on other sites
bangbang023 Veteran Share Posted September 19, 2005 That looks great but it makes me vringe thinking about the CPU and GPU power that's going to be needed to pull it off. Link to post Share on other sites
Twisted.Raven Share Posted September 19, 2005 looks awesome! the dude at the end was very realistic. Link to post Share on other sites
Mystical112 Share Posted September 19, 2005 looks pretty nice... but yea the fire didnt look all that great but still better than b4 Link to post Share on other sites
OrangeSoul Author Share Posted September 19, 2005 That looks great but it makes me vringe thinking about the CPU and GPU power that's going to be needed to pull it off. 586546448[/snapback] R600 and G90 Link to post Share on other sites
OrangeSoul Author Share Posted September 19, 2005 Remember there is NO Directx 10 card out. this was done by Software layering instead of hardware. Just Imagine when we factor Hardware layering Link to post Share on other sites
jerry Share Posted September 19, 2005 That looks great but it makes me vringe thinking about the CPU and GPU power that's going to be needed to pull it off. 586546448[/snapback] But that is amazing. Most probably the best ingame graphics so far. :o Link to post Share on other sites
Yusuf M. Veteran Share Posted September 19, 2005 Doesn't the G70 support WGF 1.0? That is Direct X 10... I think.. Link to post Share on other sites
Oompa Share Posted September 19, 2005 That looks great but it makes me cringe thinking about the CPU and GPU power that's going to be needed to pull it off. 586546448[/snapback] And how much it's gunna cost :pinch: But it sure is good looking. I can't wait. Link to post Share on other sites
jerry Share Posted September 19, 2005 Doesn't the G70 support WGF 1.0? That is Direct X 10... I think.. 586546502[/snapback] DirectX10 is WGF2.0, so no. Link to post Share on other sites
Chouzan Share Posted September 19, 2005 Half of my yearly income for a direct-feed of this demonstration! :o Truly awesome stuff. Link to post Share on other sites
Yusuf M. Veteran Share Posted September 19, 2005 DirectX10 is WGF2.0, so no. 586546514[/snapback] Alright. Thanks for clearing that up. Link to post Share on other sites
raskren Share Posted September 19, 2005 Remember there is NO Directx 10 card out. this was done by Software layering instead of hardware. Just Imagine when we factor Hardware layering 586546461[/snapback] That's what I was wondering. "How can they demo that when there aren't (that I know of) any DX10 cards available?" If this is attainable today, in software, then doing it in hardware won't [shouldn't] be that resource intensive. Link to post Share on other sites
Krage Share Posted September 19, 2005 That's what I was wondering. "How can they demo that when there aren't (that I know of) any DX10 cards available?"If this is attainable today, in software, then doing it in hardware won't [shouldn't] be that resource intensive. 586546524[/snapback] It does look great, but its not clear what hardware this is running on if its being rendered realtime or whether its prerendered HD video either... Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts