Recommended Posts

It was an interesting situation for me once I started getting to know Neowin. I had used the site for a few months for tech support and didn't expect it to be much help, since most other sites were very hit-or-miss. However, after a number of inquiries of mine were answered I started realizing that this was a more useful site, on average, than, say, LinuxQuestions ("RTFM noob!" Gee, thanks...).

However, I have some fundamental problems with advertising and the very concept of it, so it was down to "adblock anyway and to hell with 'em" or subscribe. And so, Neowin stands as one of the two first sites to which I've ever subscribed (MSFN was the other).

Also, one point to consider - some people may not have a choice but to not view Neowin's ads. My last job saw me behind a highly restrictive whitelist-based filtering proxy. I had to explicitly request access to Neowin and get it approved as a tech-support website. The ads, however, were not permitted through either because they were hosted from other domains or because the netadmin explicitly blocked them.

So when people post screenshots that are ad-free, consider that they may be in a situation like my old one rather than actively blocking themselves.

I'm still amazed at some of the people here who probably expect us to pay out of our own pockets for your community? We provide the service thats true but the current model is that the ads pay for that service, if everyone starts blocking them we will simply have to go offline because its too expensive to pay for 4 dedicated servers and the immense ammount of bandwidth per month (1 terrabyte average).

Since this was said quite some time ago, isn't this a bit hypocritical (or outright untruthful) now since you revealed that this site has been supported by a corporation for the last few years?

http://www.websiteoutlook.com/www.neowin.net

Neowin makes close to 900.00 a day in ads

LOL it's nowhere near that.. that site just calculates potential and as everyone knows we don't have the ads that make that much money (flash, full page, rollover ads etc).

Now Check Your Website Worth, daily pageview and monthly possible income
Since this was said quite some time ago, isn't this a bit hypocritical (or outright untruthful) now since you revealed that this site has been supported by a corporation for the last few years?

That corporation you are on about does support us yes, with an initial investment that we have to pay back, that investment was for servers and to set up a proper company (legal costs etc) which ad costs alone does not cover. The monthly ad revenue repays what we borrowed and keeps us afloat now that we have a much more expensive setup (server cost, accounting and in some cases paid developers etc).

Or do you think we simply pocket all of our income and rely on the "corporation" to pay for everything? That's not how any company works.

Quite sure I didn't say that. Just saying the doom and gloom forecast you were talking about wasn't 100% truthful.

Well I'd love to hear your thoughts on how our corporate backers can have anything to do with Neowin if my forcasted doom and gloom story actually happens.

It's simple economics and most people understand this, NO corporation will support a company that is losing money and despite (some peoples) belief, money isn't free either.

I guess it's pointless explaining this anyway because like I already truthfully stated, it's a question of economics, some people just believe that everything should be free, I'd love that too but sadly that simply does not work in this business.

Well I'd love to hear your thoughts on how our corporate backers can have anything to do with Neowin if my forcasted doom and gloom story actually happens.

It's simple economics and most people understand this, NO corporation will support a company that is losing money and despite (some peoples) belief, money isn't free either.

I guess it's pointless explaining this anyway because like I already truthfully stated, it's a question of economics, some people just believe that everything should be free, I'd love that too but sadly that simply does not work in this business.

oww... dun get so emo. u guys are doing a great job here. and those who try to criticise dun know what they are talking about, cos if they understand and agree with what they say, they won't be here posting.

LOL it's nowhere near that.. that site just calculates potential and as everyone knows we don't have the ads that make that much money (flash, full page, rollover ads etc).

care to say a ballpark figure then? will let people understand how much you need people to not block ads (if you do at all)

care to say a ballpark figure then? will let people understand how much you need people to not block ads (if you do at all)

We want to upgrade our 32bit servers to 64bit (for our SQL) and we can't afford to go and buy a new server and get it placed in the DC (costs extra) atm. Thats all am willing to share, it has nothing to do with how much percentage shouldn't be blocking ads. Any long term frequent visitor who does block the ads (for whatever reason) on Neowin is simply faltering our chances to improve the service.

Without trying to sound annoyed, are people really thick? a 29 page thread on this subject and some peoiple still don't understand the basic economics of our situation?

Come on people!

We want to upgrade our 32bit servers to 64bit (for our SQL) and we can't afford to go and buy a new server and get it placed in the DC (costs extra) atm. Thats all am willing to share, it has nothing to do with how much percentage shouldn't be blocking ads. Any long term frequent visitor who does block the ads (for whatever reason) on Neowin is simply faltering our chances to improve the service.

Without trying to sound annoyed, are people really thick? a 29 page thread on this subject and some peoiple still don't understand the basic economics of our situation?

Come on people!

I would say they seem to be thick... However, thick should not be confused with ignorance and/or arrogance :rofl:

We want to upgrade our 32bit servers to 64bit (for our SQL) and we can't afford to go and buy a new server and get it placed in the DC (costs extra) atm. Thats all am willing to share, it has nothing to do with how much percentage shouldn't be blocking ads. Any long term frequent visitor who does block the ads (for whatever reason) on Neowin is simply faltering our chances to improve the service.

Without trying to sound annoyed, are people really thick? a 29 page thread on this subject and some peoiple still don't understand the basic economics of our situation?

Come on people!

well if for example your costs were $1000/month and you made $50/month from ads, then your attitude towards people would be more understandable, if you made $1500/month from ads then you'd be seen as greedy as you're making a profit from ads alone yet want to ban anyone who mentions blocking ads etc. Without you giving any details of the economics of your situation it's hard for people to know :p

I still don't understand why you're paying stardock back if they bought into the company, or did they give a loan out too?

If i were you, my stance would be simple:

Site's ad revenue lower than spending: Tell people the site is losing money and needs people not to block ads (ie don't demand it)

Site's ad revenue higher than spending: Don't have any rules on ad blocking

OK, some months of the fiscal year are more expensive than what we make in ad revenue, but not all. Plus the fact that we are a company so our purpose is also to make it profitable (like MySpace, YouTube, CNet etc also does) and not a total disaster and then add in the fact that our servers will need to be replaced at some point.

It's simple really.

Stardock did not buy us out-right, they have a share. If they had bought us out, then I'd understand your meaning but it's simply not the case. They "part" own us, the details of the transaction was never made public (just as many other websites that are bought out or sponsored) and those details aren't required either, all you have to worry about is if we made the correct decision and us being able to keep the site online (3 years further down the line, we seem to be doing that).

I won't pretend that every member must care about our financial situation, because the reality of that is the complete opposite in many cases. It's just a request that if you want Neowin to get better and better it costs money, and members can do their part by allowing the ads to show.

I'll say it again, as I've said in the past, show me a community of this size that has less ads, we are bare bones and we try very hard to place them in a non obtrusive manner (more so for members who see less ads than guests).

I think we should appreciate the fact the money and business is something that is quite private in many cases. Neobond, Redmak and co. have set up a thriving community, we all use it and obviously enjoy it, otherwise why are you here? Whether Neowin is profitable or not I don't really care. If the powers to be can run with a profit game, more power to them as they did the donkey work and deserve to reap the rewards.

I find it quite rude to ask about a persons finances anyway.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Wow, spoken like a true blind hater, you don't even provide arguments. Please, go check my comment above to @seacaptain and you'll find out why what you say doesn't make sense in this context...
    • Get used to this, with AI tooling now uncovering new vulns and getting them exploitable far faster than has ever been possible before software is going to need to be updated far more frequently. Back in the day it may take reseachers weeks or months to do what AI can now do in hours. Once its a threat is discovered it's weaponsized far more quickly, meaning you simply can't be waiting 2, 3, 4 weeks to deploy a patch, it needs to be patched immediately. Going to be interesting handling this in the enterprise space where traditionally patching has been steady, but very staged (and rightly so up until now), that is going to have to change.
    • You don't need to "close all browser sessions constantly" or wait for updates to install. The updates download in the background while you use the browser, without interrupting you, they install automatically the next time you launch the app. And they install very fast (depending on your storage speeds, of course), you have to wait at most 2-3 extra seconds, if any. Seems like you haven't used Edge in a loooooooong time...
    • Segra 1.6.0 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.0 changelog: Recording: Added HDR support. Grand Theft Auto: Added game integration for deaths (FiveM and RAGE MP supported). Highlights: Added customizable padding for highlights. Replay Buffer: Added a shockwave visual effect when a replay buffer clip is saved. Audio: Increased the maximum sound effects volume from 100% to 200%. Hotkeys: Fixed hotkeys not triggering while unrelated keys were held. Installer: Added code signing to verify publisher identity, branded the installer, and reduced OS security warnings. OBS: Updated the supported OBS version to 32.1.2. Download: Segra 1.6.0 | 74.4 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      175
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      163
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!