[Shell Patcher] Tango Icons for Windows


Recommended Posts

lol who says its first ?

Who says Trillian is bloatware?

Who says either are even on the list?

For that matter, who says there's even a list?

Damn, this topic is better than the Jokes Board :p

Trillian is, in my opinion, a great multi-client IM app that requires very little setup and can be used immediately out of the box. Miranda is good but requires a bit of knowledge and stuff to get it up and running and sometimes can be very confusing. However, I've tried skinning Trillian with Tango icons and it's not impossible but very VERY tedious and difficult. Miranda is much easier to skin with Tango icons, I believe.

Anyhow, that's jut my 23 cents ;)

lol nice quoting super really captures that point pretty funny, made me laugh :)

im just kidding with tirllian, though I would never go near trillian unless I was going to give it to grandma

better then most of the crap thats in the software sea, most definetly AIM

Probably the best/easiest/only way to work it would be to take a skin that matches your WM theme, grab copies of the icons, and start hacking away bits of skin with old icons, and copypaste the Tango stuff in place. I think the protocol icons may be managed seperately, or at least skinnable seperate from the main skin, but I don't remember - it's been 2-3 years since I stopped pirating Trillian Pro in favor of Gaim :shiftyninja:

Probably the best/easiest/only way to work it would be to take a skin that matches your WM theme, grab copies of the icons, and start hacking away bits of skin with old icons, and copypaste the Tango stuff in place. I think the protocol icons may be managed seperately, or at least skinnable seperate from the main skin, but I don't remember - it's been 2-3 years since I stopped pirating Trillian Pro in favor of Gaim :shiftyninja:

The images are all over the place. SOme exist in the actual trillian.exe, some are in the images folder and so on and so forth. If there is a folder for Trillian it'll have images from some part of the app in it. It's extremely difficult to change those icons and I believe Cerulean studios made it that way for a reason, those evil dudes. I'm still peeved that they haven't given the tiniest bit of info on how Astra is coming along. I too have moved to GAIM now. I'm mainly on Linux now anyway if the damn thing will actual work properly for more than a minute.

The images are all over the place. SOme exist in the actual trillian.exe, some are in the images folder and so on and so forth. If there is a folder for Trillian it'll have images from some part of the app in it. It's extremely difficult to change those icons and I believe Cerulean studios made it that way for a reason, those evil dudes. I'm still peeved that they haven't given the tiniest bit of info on how Astra is coming along. I too have moved to GAIM now. I'm mainly on Linux now anyway if the damn thing will actual work properly for more than a minute.
Yeah, considering the anti-piracy checks, and the auto-update abilities, it probably downloads a new version of itself - but that's only an issue if you're trying to hack the images in the binaries themselves. Making a skin for Trillian is the reverse - you'll be spending all day hacking XML and images, but to get and replace them all you have to do is unzip.

Are you using 1.5.0? You've got to be using 2.0beta3.1 or newer (2.0beta5 is out); MSN changed something and it broke older versions of Gaim.

That would do it. I have 1.5.0. I just downloaded the first thing I could find :rolleyes:

I'll get 2.0b3.1

My iColorFolder skins for Industrial and Gnome are up on my BobP's site. I can't call their inclusion in the patcher done without 'em, although that's not really of much use to anyone else without this month's patcher revision. No, it's not out yet :rofl:

That would do it. I have 1.5.0. I just downloaded the first thing I could find :rolleyes:

I'll get 2.0b3.1

... and not 2.0b5? Edited by vertigosity

My iColorFolder skins for Industrial and Gnome are up on my BobP's site. I can't call their inclusion in the patcher done without 'em, although that's not really of much use to anyone else without this month's patcher revision. No, it's not out yet :rofl:... and not 2.0b5?

It's out! I've been waiting for 2.0b5. Downloading now.

Can't wait for the November release of Tango!

On a side note, I made some of my own modifications to the iColorFolder Tango thingy... so that not only are plain folder colors selectable, but also a bunch of blue emblemated folders created/modified by me. (Some of the same ones I released earlier as icons.)

My iColorFolder skins for Industrial and Gnome are up on my BobP's site. I can't call their inclusion in the patcher done without 'em, although that's not really of much use to anyone else without this month's patcher revision. No, it's not out yet :rofl:... and not 2.0b5?

lol, yeah, I'll get 2.0b5. For some reason I just read "2.0b3.1" and didn't see what you had in parentheses there.

The November revision is out. It's only up on tango.benpbrown.com right now, as DeviantArt seems to have broken their file submission system, and I still need to get around to picking a new host for darkt.net (I'm lazy, I know).

Changes: Adds Gnome-icon-theme2 and NLD10 Industrial as base icon themes; minor resources changes otherwise. Patcher code (installer only) has been extended to allow for user-supplied custom resources, and command-line selection of icon theme for silent operation (see FAQ for more information).

Barring anything terribly new and interesting from the upstream developers, this will probably be the last major revision to the patcher. I'm still working on my card set, but it needed some major revisioning from that concept shot earlier and it's not done yet; but when it is, there'll be a revision for it. I'm not buying two copies of Vista Ultimate (I'd need to, to get some of the functionality I have out of XP right now), so for those of you hoping for me to announce a Vista version, you may now be disappointed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!