Recommended Posts

wow....this is just the most amazing news

when the new intel g5 counterparts come out if this works and allows me to dual boot osx and vista each off their own 500gb HDs then i'll definitly be upgrading.

i wont be trading in my powerbook to be able to do this but if all works out i'll def swap out my desktop. damn i cant wait now.

I think that's a real possibility. But the developers who develop for Mac OS X aren't going to abandon the platform anytime soon. There are way too many people who use it, and who aren't willing to shell out the $300 required to buy a Windows XP CD (assuming they don't already have one).

It would definitely be a shame to see this happen, considering how amazing Mac OS X is. I think it will continue to live on for many years to come. Then again, Dvorak does have a pretty good track record thus far...

Yeah,

I'm sort of fearful that this might lead to OSX dying. The reason I would really buy a mac in the first place would be to run OSX, not XP :x .

The only thing I'm worried about is what will developers do. They spend money on supporting both camps, and now both are available on one machine. Could some just give Apple the big FU and say well u can use windows so use it now that they are on the same machine. Could this move actually hurt OS X?

I keep thinking that the people buying a Mac and those that are going to switch as a result of this will be doing so so they can use OS X yet still be able to use windows for those pesky little apps. But then couldn't developers say, well we will be one of those pesky apps so use windows. It could be a domino effect that could really hurt OS X. What are your guys thoughts?

I had a think about this and I feel OSX isn't going to suffer, if at all, that much. Personally I wouldn't go out and buy a Mac just so I can run windows on it. I will be buying a Mac so I can run OSX, just now I have the bonus of dual booting XP when I need it.

Yeah,

I'm sort of fearful that this might lead to OSX dying. The reason I would really buy a mac in the first place would be to run OSX, not XP :x .

Ok, well I have rethought this whole situation and as it stands now, I think this is only a good move on Apple's part. I am using the OS/2 fiasco as an example.

I was thinking the same thing. But the difference is, like some have mentioned, you still have to shell out a bit for a copy of Windows. Also, OS/2 supported the Dos platform. The company supported the platform meaning that if something went wrong, they would fix it and its okay. That also meant they supported apps for it.

Heres where the difference is. Apple right now, isn't supporting Windows. It isn't supporting Windows Apps. It is simply streamlining the ability to install another OS on their hardware. Thats it. That means, ok you can use foreign software on our hardware, we will make it easy too, but we will not offer any type of support for doing so. User beware.

Since that is the case, developers can't just say oh well, no need to port apps because one it will drive up the cost of the software for users, and two, if something goes wrong, the user isn't supported by the company that made the computer. Thats a huge deal if you think about it. Basically what this is doing is making it so that people that have two machines, one with windows, and one with OS X can make it into just one box. But in terms of support issues, development issues, etc, its the same as having two separate machines.

Also, the majority of people that will do this, will in the end, ditch windows because they will be people switching that are nervous. That means more and more people will move to OS X as their primary OS. So lets say that MS Office goes to being windows only. Ok, well those people that have switched to OS X and ditched Windows, only using it as a stepping stone, will find an OS X alternative, therefore supporting that developer instead of MS (using office as the example still, first plausible app that came to mind, nothing more). Chances are, most developers will want to stay competitive with others and this is another reason why they will want to stay dual platform.

The key is how Apple goes from here, will they continue to not support Windows and windows apps, and leave boot camp the way it is or instead in Leopard produce a Redbox type idea (that was a NextStep dealie) and have built in emulation in OS X. Thats when things could get to being like OS/2 but as of now, this move is harmless, and I think Apple will be smart enough to handle the situation in a wise way.

So it depends on how Apple goes from here, but if they use their heads, things will only get better. I think as of now, this will mean a larger OS X user base which means developers will want to make more and more apps for OS X since Apple is still not supporting non Apple apps running in windows though its on their hardware.

Vista is a no go. It starts to install, gets to the first reboot and then errors out with:

Boot loader is not correctly installed...

\Windows\System32\winload.exe

Status: 0xc0000225

Grr...maybe in the next beta of Boot Camp

Very informative. Thanks! Yeah, hopefully in the next beta...or in Leopard.

Imagine that, OSX, XP, Vista, etc.

ok, stupid question...where the hell is the option key on a non-mac keyboard? ...i thought it was Alt right? ...cause that's not workin, at all.

[update] Ok, problem solved...apparently it wasn't detecting my USB keyboard plugged in through my KVM early enough. I plugged it directly into the mini and I got the menu selection fine.

Sucks about Vista, but oh well for now.

Edited by xxdesmus

F***! Doesn't Apple realize that they just kicked themselves in the balls with this approach? Now, Microsoft's able to seize the complete OS market, which I totally disapprove, given the fact that Mac OS X 10.4 is superior to anything Vista can come up with! Now the only way Apple's Mac OS is going to live is that they allow Mac OS to be installed on non-Apple machines!

Just somebody remind me to give Steve Jobs hell on this one!

F***! Doesn't Apple realize that they just kicked themselves in the balls with this approach? Now, Microsoft's able to seize the complete OS market, which I totally disapprove, given the fact that Mac OS X 10.4 is superior to anything Vista can come up with! Now the only way Apple's Mac OS is going to live is that they allow Mac OS to be installed on non-Apple machines!

Just somebody remind me to give Steve Jobs hell on this one!

you have to remember lots of stuff doesnt run on OSX, i have to use windows to flash my gba cart and umd stuff

F***! Doesn't Apple realize that they just kicked themselves in the balls with this approach? Now, Microsoft's able to seize the complete OS market, which I totally disapprove, given the fact that Mac OS X 10.4 is superior to anything Vista can come up with! Now the only way Apple's Mac OS is going to live is that they allow Mac OS to be installed on non-Apple machines!

Just somebody remind me to give Steve Jobs hell on this one!

Let's see, the ramblings of a fanboy, or a huge profit increase... which does Apple care about more... hmm....

Finally Mac users can enjoy the Windows experience in its entirety:

http://www.eng.bu.edu/~anc/macosx_bluescreen/blue2.jpg

Owned indeed! ROFL! Mac users who plan to boot windows...get used to see-ing this windows random gift from Bill and his team.

LMAO. :wacko:

F***! Doesn't Apple realize that they just kicked themselves in the balls with this approach? Now, Microsoft's able to seize the complete OS market, which I totally disapprove, given the fact that Mac OS X 10.4 is superior to anything Vista can come up with! Now the only way Apple's Mac OS is going to live is that they allow Mac OS to be installed on non-Apple machines!

Just somebody remind me to give Steve Jobs hell on this one!

Not really, what they did was very smart, it is an easier way to do something that was already possible and legal. Windows and its apps are still not supported by Apple and you have to remember, the people buying Macs are going to buy a Mac because they want the OS, not so that they can run windows on them. This is just a way for people that have to deal with both OSes to have a cheaper and easier way to have the best of both worlds as well as a way to get more people to switch over. It really is a terrific idea providing that Apple continues to not support the Windows platform as well as any of its apps. If they started providing support for that, then trouble would begin.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!