• 0

Logo request, Superior Shine Auto Detailing, $150


Question

206 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I don't think slapping text and calling it a day would be worth 150$. Joe could have done that himself if that was the case.

if you'll notice i spent time on other logo's, however someone said just the text would look good, so i quickly did that. maybe you should read the whole thread before making comments. thus the "as suggested" comment.

i'll also remind you that some of the most recognizable logo's in the world are JUST text. Ie. Sony, Coca-cola, Subway, the list goes on.

  • 0

Pi, I'll say it again, that's very Neowinnish, and I really think you should consider dropping it. I'm not sure Neobond would be very happy about someone selling a logo which is extremely similar to NWs for $150. I could be wrong, but that's just my opinion. I know I would be.

  • 0

if you'll notice i spent time on other logo's, however someone said just the text would look good, so i quickly did that. maybe you should read the whole thread before making comments. thus the "as suggested" comment.

i'll also remind you that some of the most recognizable logo's in the world are JUST text. Ie. Sony, Coca-cola, Subway, the list goes on.

I read the posts, but just happened to qutoe your post rather than the "as suggested" one. So don't jump to conclusions.

Yes, some recognizable logos are just text, but most of them are short words or like Coca-Cola (if you don't consider it short), don't have a lot of different letters... 4 only for Coca-Cola. Short names are better recognizeble in type only because they are short and easy to remember. While long names require something to ballance it out and make for people remember it easily.

Besides, many logos that are just text, have undergone some sort of tweaking to the original font, if you will, before seeing the daylight. And many times it's a custom font anyway. Very seldom, if ever, you would see recognizable logos with just default font slapped. I would assume Sony could be one of those, but again, it's a short name and the original font could have been tweaked slightly to accommodate the needs.

  • 0

I have been reading the thread. Now then:

neologo.gifpost-146626-1150503692.jpg

Compare.

They are the EXACT SAME STYLE. Not "similar". Not "using elements of the logo". Just recreating someone elses idea, and changing it a tiny bit, to meet the circumstances.

I know he asked for something like that, but that's not "like", it's "the same", to all extents and purposes.

In order to stay on topic, I think one of the nicest logos so far was actually Pox's first submission. That wasn't half bad.

  • 0

Let's try to post with a higher level of maturity, please.

[Thread Cleaned]

Barney

Sorry Barney i am man enough to apoligize.. but come on clean all the threads that lit the wick... all i ask is people read the threads, then comment.. if they were to do this, i would not have been upset.

Hey don't even go back to the first page, but only look up to the third post on this page... AND READ IT... hmm that seems to be from Superior Shine... the person that requested the logo... ah gee maybe its just me

  • 0

I have been reading the thread. Now then:

neologo.gifpost-146626-1150503692.jpg

Compare.

They are the EXACT SAME STYLE. Not "similar". Not "using elements of the logo". Just recreating someone elses idea, and changing it a tiny bit, to meet the circumstances.

Exactly what I was going to say... and personally I think P1Guy has killed it, that text looks terrible and the background gradient is much too obvious.

  • 0

i think it's not P1 fault, the logo requester asked for a neowinia logo style, so he just did that.

Ya and i get a warning... wow how unfair is that. as i was upset to see the same people trying to put me down, and i was doing what i was asked for. But because of this, i will only try harder to ignore some posters :D life is way to short to argue with people :alien: Thanks for the support, at least someone here read the thread properly

  • 0

Go away if you don't know anything about anything. Thanks.

now thats not true. harbouring an honours degreee in electroinc engineering, i'd say i know alot about alot!! :whistle:

but besides that, you really shouldnt slag-off someone for copying a car logo when thats EXACTLY what you did a few months ago. thats all!

  • 0

now thats not true. harbouring an honours degreee in electroinc engineering, i'd say i know alot about alot!! :whistle:

but besides that, you really shouldnt slag-off someone for copying a car logo when thats EXACTLY what you did a few months ago. thats all!

You just don't get it. Go spread your lies somewhere else, I'm not willing to explain the same things over and over again to some random kid who hasn't got a clue.

You might know a lot about sausages and traditional korean castration techniques, but when it comes to design you should let the grown ups do the talking, OK? Weren't you that Photoshop-Filter-Maniac that kept ruining my logos? Nuff said, you're just out of your element. Accept it.

  • 0

cybadelic, don?t get me wrong from what i have seen of your work, i like very much. My only point is, that you got on to somebody for doing a similar thing that you did once! THAT. was. All. No need to throw your rattle out your pram.

Kindly refrain from using those derogatory comments, as I am not insulting you! and I can assure you I am no ?random kid?

I don?t wish to turn this into some war, so lets just draw line under it and let the forum carry on with the topic in question.

Thanks.

  • 0

as I am not insulting you!

Yes, you are. You are calling me a thief, because apparently I copied the Chrysler-logo, which simply isn't true. And yes, you are some random kid, otherwise you wouldn't call me a thief for no reason.

  • 0

Yes, you are. You are calling me a thief, because apparently I copied the Chrysler-logo, which simply isn't true. And yes, you are some random kid, otherwise you wouldn't call me a thief for no reason.

i never once mentioned "theif". But you said it, so if the shoe fits! Almost everyone who saw your logo in that forum said to you that it looks uncannily like the Chrysler logo!

And again, NO, im an not a random kid. I am a 24 year old graduate who has just finished university, an who as a very high profile interview a week on Thursday. Warhead electronic design engineer. Trust me, random kids DO NOT get flown 400 miles and put up in accommodation just so they can attend a high profile job like that.

  • 0

Why not deal with these issues in a PM and let the topic starter have a clean topic? you are only ruining future negotiations by speking freely like this. There is no need to speak so openly about sensitive issues such as this one.

  • 0

i never once mentioned "theif". But you said it, so if the shoe fits! Almost everyone who saw your logo in that forum said to you that it looks uncannily like the Chrysler logo!

And again, NO, im an not a random kid. I am a 24 year old graduate who has just finished university, an who as a very high profile interview a week on Thursday. Warhead electronic design engineer. Trust me, random kids DO NOT get flown 400 miles and put up in accommodation just so they can attend a high profile job like that.

lol.

agreed.

So you agree? Who brought all that **** up then, dipstick?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!