• 0

Logo request, Superior Shine Auto Detailing, $150


Question

206 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

lol.

So you agree? Who brought all that **** up then, dipstick?

:rolleyes:

you have the cheek to call me some random kid. think you need to READ the rules.

No Flaming, Personal attacks such as flaming, instigating "flame bait", verbal abuse or mocking of members in forum posts are not tolerated at Neowin. Such posts will be deleted on sight and moderated accordingly.

As above, if you are a long standing member, act like one. Lead by example and assist other newer members rather then attacking them. Members that reply to posts simply to instigate argument will be dealt with and shown no mercy.

  • 0

And again, NO, im an not a random kid. I am a 24 year old graduate who has just finished university, an who as a very high profile interview a week on Thursday. Warhead electronic design engineer.

I don't see how that makes you "not - random"?! :/

When he said random, he meant a person who doesn't know him, or much of anything related to him. So you being a 24 year old graduate makes you know him, how!? I don't see the connection on what you said to what he said. :blink:

  • 0

time to cool off guys. Cyba is an excellent designer. Whether his logo looked like the crysler logo or not isn't important anymore. Niether is it important that P1Guys looks like the neowin logo. Let's just get back to the topic at hand.

  • 0

hey you know whats funny... i wanted to copy the rolls royce logo and i did. I might say it even looks better than theirs. I did it because the thread asked for a neowin style logo... ahummm, again for the people that read the threads.. ahahahaha as i new that it was not going to win, because a specific style was asked for.

hmmmmm, i think its beer time again :alien:

  • 0

I agree lets get back to posting logos

post-168805-1150741735.png

hmm, this is some good work...and as rage said...they glowing circle goes well with the company name, but perhaps you should not slant the car and the bubble it's in. Make is straight and inline with the text and I think you might have a good shot.

  • 0

- Keeps to your colours

- Doesnt feature gradients, so its good for printing

- Keeps the existing car logo with sparkle spindles

- Isnt too colour intensive, good for printing

- Auto detailing isnt capitalised but its black bg draws attention to it

- Capitalised main txt to draw attention

Two variations, one for the side

post-122333-1150748697.jpg

post-122333-1150749244_thumb.jpg

Edited by azz0r_wugg
  • 0

ss5zq.jpg

This looks really nice, but the logo looks more like a logo for some video game.

post-18541-1150142688.png

I like this one quite a bit.

shine2.jpg

Looks nice, but it doens't look like a car, but a train as mentioned somewhere. I liek the idea tho.

superiorshinelatestcopy8re.jpg

By far I like hte one in teh middle with the white text. The bottom is abit too plain. The first one witht eh white stroke, is a no. The black text is ok too. The white text one looks the best, probly couse you don't see any of the jaggies you see ont eh black text/logo.

  • 0

I played around with some stuff, lots of gradients. Then I took a time out. I thought to myself "What would look best on the side of a truck, printed on a business card, or put on a t-shirt?" but I also wanted something modern that would get the shine point across. This is what I came up with because I'm in a starry mood today and my new boss has a Mini and is obsessed with it. So hopefully the Mini racing stripes + symbol for shinyness should get the point across, maybe not as directly as your old logo but much, much more modern. So here you go:

post-109367-1150859827.png

  • 0

I played around with some stuff, lots of gradients. Then I took a time out. I thought to myself "What would look best on the side of a truck, printed on a business card, or put on a t-shirt?" but I also wanted something modern that would get the shine point across. This is what I came up with because I'm in a starry mood today and my new boss has a Mini and is obsessed with it. So hopefully the Mini racing stripes + symbol for shinyness should get the point across, maybe not as directly as your old logo but much, much more modern. So here you go:

(N)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!