• 0

Logo request, Superior Shine Auto Detailing, $150


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I was trying to find a way to simplify the car, maye vectorize it. It is just a basic concept i need to refine

that's cool. I meant no disrespect. I think if you vectorized it and kept the colours simple (don't make the text a gradient, keep it solid white) it would look superb (Y)

  • 0

^No offense mate they look like they've came off the 1990 Lorry, you know with the big bevelled look. I aint giving you any stick but I'd tone it down a bit and use something less in your face. Like softness for a logo and not so OTT.

The one that uses the Porsche silhouette (It looks like one anyway sorry if it isn't) is pretty nice, and I like that one the most upto now! So whoever did that good work.

  • 0

Here is mine in Vector

http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f276/PAN...ilingV2copy.jpg

[edit] It wont show the pick, so i will just link to it.

Edited by Pandemonium
  • 0

A bunch of awesome choices here!!

I have a bunch of people following this thread. Here are the one I am getting the most feedback about -

If voting would to be right now this one would win -

post-18541-1150142688.png

It will need a little tweeking to be just right but we will cross that bridge if it wins.

Again, thanks again everybody.

  • 0

A bunch of awesome choices here!!

I have a bunch of people following this thread. Here are the one I am getting the most feedback about -

If voting would to be right now this one would win -

post-18541-1150142688.png

It will need a little tweeking to be just right but we will cross that bridge if it wins.

Again, thanks again everybody.

I agree :D

  • 0

I think I have to disagree with you there also. Amateur? You mean like this?

09515b41.jpg

hey, looking back, ye i can see that was not good. but hey, we live and learn. it was my firs logo and im new to photoshop. however, that still doesnt meant i cant have an opinion on what looks nice!

Well, it's not as if I'm a pro, so where exactly did I not meet expectations..? :p

m8, i wasnt trying to be horrible, and yes, it probalby is better than anything i could do. i just felt it looked slightly dwarfed in comparison to the high calibre designs that were being churned out here.

again, no offence. :)

A bunch of awesome choices here!!

I have a bunch of people following this thread. Here are the one I am getting the most feedback about -

If voting would to be right now this one would win -

post-18541-1150142688.png

It will need a little tweeking to be just right but we will cross that bridge if it wins.

Again, thanks again everybody.

while i think that looks really cool. is it maybe a bitclose for comfort on with the jaguar logo. maybe its fine, i dunno. just wanted to pointit out.

Jaguar%20Logo.jpg

  • 0

while i think that looks really cool. is it maybe a bitclose for comfort on with the jaguar logo. maybe its fine, i dunno. just wanted to pointit out.

Jaguar%20Logo.jpg

Yeah, they're both on a black background, so they're practically identical. You're a genius.

  • 0

^ hahahahaha. t!t :-)

Don't laugh, tell us how the two logos you just compared are similar. I'd love to hear that. Here's the answer: They don't even look anywhere near the same. Otherwise the Samsung-Logo would be similar to those two as well. PLEASE just stop posting in this thread, you're being completely ridiculous with your accusations. And by the way: It's none of your business anyway.

  • 0

Don't laugh, tell us how the two logos you just compared are similar. I'd love to hear that. Here's the answer: They don't even look anywhere near the same. Otherwise the Samsung-Logo would be similar to those two as well. PLEASE just stop posting in this thread, you're being completely ridiculous with your accusations. And by the way: It's none of your business anyway.

i cant believe that a man of your aristics calibre (YES, i do think your work is awesome) is unable to receive critisism without being down right rude to the person who is giving it. I bet if you slid the over inflated stick from within your @ss, down a few notches then you'd actually be a nice guy. im sorry, but I AM allowed an opnion here. And f you think that only your opnion counts, then you sir are an eliteist bafoon.

good day

  • 0

i cant believe that a man of your aristics calibre (YES, i do think your work is awesome) is unable to receive critisism without being down right rude to the person who is giving it. I bet if you slid the over inflated stick from within your @ss, down a few notches then you'd actually be a nice guy. im sorry, but I AM allowed an opnion here. And f you think that only your opnion counts, then you sir are an eliteist bafoon.

good day

I'm sorry ... but if your opinion is that logo looks anything like the Jaguar logo you need your eyes tested.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!