The Moon does not exist!

By I am Reid
in It's a Conspiracy!

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

digitalsoft

Posted
Posted

as crazy as this thread and that site may be i just found this for the titanic, http://www.revisionism.nl/Titanic/Titanic1.htm - sorry if someone already put this in this thread but i dont have time to go back on the other pages...

Grand Master

CrashG

Posted
Posted
A cash reward of $100,000 has been offered to anyone who can send us, by e-mail, conclusive physical evidence of the existence of the moon. This reward remains unclaimed.

Can you prove that the moon exists? Write to us at: [email protected]

Umm... Look in the sky at night. Now send my money.

  • 4 weeks later...
Grand Master

SnowRanger13

Posted
Posted (edited)

Tides, Telescopes, Lunar eclipses and Solar eclipse say otherwise. I'm sorry but I don't see how anyone could believe this.

If it was some kind of balloon it would not have enough gravitational pull and then we would not have our tides.

No way there could be something that big and that much detail made by the government, get a good telescope and look at it closely.

If you can prove that Tides, Telescopes, Lunar eclipses and Solar eclipse can be made by something else then I might consider the moon is fake.

The tide myth is one of the oldest and most absurd lies that the Lunar establishment has tried to push on a gullible world. Do they really expect us to believe that the moon - an object that allegedly resides at an average distance of 240,000 miles from the earth - has the power, from that distance, to lift how many billions of cubic meters of water?

Do an experiment: take a rubber ball and suspend it above a bathtub full of water. Now slowly move the ball closer to the water. Does the level of the water change? Not even slightly. So much for the tides myth.

The clouds are considerably closer to the moon, and much lighter than the oceans. One would imagine that if the moon had the power to raise the oceans, this same force would cause the clouds to go flying into space, yet this does not happen. This proves that the tides story is physically impossible.

Can this guy be any more stupid? Yes everything makes gravity but a rubber ball makes almost no gravity compared to earth, when your have the full force of earths gravity the gravity of a rubber ball is not going to do anything! but taking that same earth gravitational pull vs the moon that weighs 7.3477?1022 kg now you might actually see something. I can't even go into how much is wrong with this so called "experiment" and I'm only 18.

And about the clouds he almost answered it himself, clouds are very light. Gravitational pull has to with the weight of two objects and the distance between them meaning there is going to be a very small pull on them from the moon, Also there are different atmosphere levels that stop things like clouds from going above a certain point. Also the Earth is something like 81 times the size of the moon so it's gravitational pull is much bigger and would pull the clouds to us with a much stronger force.

This guy has obviously never taken any Physics courses, because he dose not understand that every single thing around that rubber ball and that tub of water is applying gravity to the tub of water. Probably the most idiotic thing about this is how he says we have no hard proof that the moon exists, and then he goes off saying things without any proof.

I feel sorry for the original poster to believe this.

Edited by cloudstrife13
Grand Master

vincent

Posted
Posted
Tides, Telescopes, Lunar eclipses and Solar eclipse say otherwise. I'm sorry but I don't see how anyone could believe this.

If it was some kind of balloon it would not have enough gravitational pull and then we would not have our tides.

No way there could be something that big and that much detail made by the government, get a good telescope and look at it closely.

If you can prove that Tides, Telescopes, Lunar eclipses and Solar eclipse can be made by something else then I might consider the moon is fake.

OP was satire, which was covered later on in this thread. Please read first.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • what other retro software do yall use

      By +InsaneNutter · Posted

      At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
    • what other retro software do yall use

      By He's Dead Jim · Posted

      On my music making (non internet) PC Sony Acid Pro 7.0 Adobe Audition 2015 Korg Legacy Collection Windows 7 SP1
    • Microsoft releases major feature updates for stock Windows 11 apps

      By PurSpyk · Posted

      Anyway to download these versions without being on the Experimental builds?
    • Microsoft about to radically change how often your Edge browser updates

      By testman · Posted

      Nothing is stopping you from continuing with your testing cadence. If updates are released every 2 weeks instead of 4, and you test once every 4 weeks, the exact same amount of patches will still be available for you in those 4 weeks. For example: Before 4th week - patch 1, 2, 3, 4 After 2nd week - patch 1 and 2 4th week - patch 3 and 4 Still the same amount after 4.
    • Microsoft about to radically change how often your Edge browser updates

      By testman · Posted

      Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!