UEFA Champions League Thread


UEFA Champions League 2006-07  

128 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win the UEFA Champions League 2006-07?

    • Barcelona
      8
    • Chelsea
      16
    • Bayern Munich
      3
    • Liverpool
      30
    • Real Madrid
      3
    • Manchester United
      34
    • Arsenal
      9
    • AC Milan
      22
    • FC Porto
      0
    • Celtic
      3
  2. 2. Who will be the top goal scorer?

    • Thierry Henry
      21
    • Frank Lampard
      4
    • Wayne Rooney
      20
    • Andriy Shevchenko
      7
    • Ronaldinho
      8
    • Kaka
      32
    • Klose
      1
    • Steven Gerrard
      17
    • Ronaldo
      14
    • Lionel Messi
      4


Recommended Posts

What a result for Liverpool! I was worried they'd get slaughtered after the first 15mins but Barca just couldn't really pull it together like they able to and Liverpool played well. Shame Liverpool's goals didn't come in the second half though, I would have won ?170.

COME ON YOU REDDDDDDDDSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

WOOOHOOOOO

2 away goals to take with us to the fortress that is anfield. wahey!

although, the camera action in both games (liverpool and chelski) were shoddy and so was the refereeing!

Well, ref was ok, good result for liverpool, camera work was appauling, but the worst of all was barcelona, i am truely dissapointed, i thought they were meant to be a football team, not a bunch of fairy's, seriously, UEFA need to sort out this diving, if the play goes down and there is no contact, they should recieve a one match suspension for every time it happens, there are enough cameras to form a decision, we need to come down hard on this diving cos its spoiling the game, football - contact sport, not any more!

The referee was terrible, he would not let play flow and 80% of the decisions he made where wrong. Did anyone else think the Spanish camera men did a crap job as well? You could not even see the ball half the time.

Bellamy was a legend with his Golf club celebration :D

indexphpactiondlattachtnr6.png

73385455gz7.jpg

I forgot to mention, Carra was my man of the match!

Well, ref was ok, good result for liverpool, camera work was appauling, but the worst of all was barcelona, i am truely dissapointed, i thought they were meant to be a football team, not a bunch of fairy's, seriously, UEFA need to sort out this diving, if the play goes down and there is no contact, they should recieve a one match suspension for every time it happens, there are enough cameras to form a decision, we need to come down hard on this diving cos its spoiling the game, football - contact sport, not any more!

Right, and how exactly do you determine whether there was contact or not during a game? In fact, how do you define contact? Bearing in mind these players are running faster that most of us can imagine.

Obviously there are some cases in which diving is blatant (C. Ronaldo anyone?), but you have to appreciate the skill and pace in the game, and the slightest hint of physical contact will bring a player down. And yeah, they will make a meal of it, wouldn't you?

Seriously, the subject has had it's fair share of discussion, and I think for the time being we just have to accept it's part of the modern game. I'm sick of all these announcers whining on about modern players being soft, modern players diving. The game has evolved.

Get over it.

As for the game, well I'm hugely disappointed as a Barca fan. Terrible performance.

Obviously there are some cases in which diving is blatant (C. Ronaldo anyone?), but you have to appreciate the skill and pace in the game, and the slightest hint of physical contact will bring a player down. And yeah, they will make a meal of it, wouldn't you?

You have to admit, barca went down a lot tonight, and liverpool aint the most physical team, and it wasnt as tho there was a lot of skill making most of your players go down so easily! :rofl:

for an example of the shoddy refereeing, in the chelski game, essien (i think) tackled i think Assuncao right by the half way line touchline, got the ball cleanly, in the second half, was an amazing tackle i reckon, and although the player went down, took the ball cleanly from him...and gave a free kick.... was shocking

also, i swear the camera men were blind and were operating under radio - "left a bit, down a bit,right,etc etc" was really really poor!

  • 2 weeks later...

Get in there! Liverpool are through! I hardly have any nails left now, I was crapping myself all the way through, especially in the last fifteen minutes just after Barca scored. Liverpool played very well and we controlled the game, just as we did during most of the game at the Nou Camp. The atmosphere at Anfield was fantastic and I think it really helped lift the players at the end of the game when we started to get a bit heavy legged! I think we where unlucky not to win though, we hit the crossbar twice and we should of scored when Valdes made two great saves and then Puyol cleared off the line, but I knew Barca would end up scoring as it just had to be a nervy finale, there was just no other way!

Carra was IMMENSE!

You'll Never Walk Alone

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple reluctantly forces strict new age checks on Texas users starting today by Paul Hill Apple will begin enforcing the Texas Age Assurance Law (SB 2420) following a recent court ruling that lifted an injunction on SB 2420. Starting June 4 (today), Apple will enforce strict age-verification and parental-consent rules for new Apple accounts created in Texas. This move will affect children under 18 who go to download apps or attempt to make in-app purchases. Apple previously expressed privacy concerns related to this law, but compliance is now mandatory for the company, nevertheless. Apple will use several APIs to follow the law. Principally, the Declared Age Range API will fetch the specific user age bracket (Under 13, 13-15, 16-17, or 18+) and a verification method. The Significant Change API (PermissionKit) will trigger a system dialog for parental consent if an app gets a major update or an age-rating shift. There is also a new property type in StoreKit that allows developers to automatically check when their app’s age rating has changed on a user’s device and then use the Significant Change API to request parental consent. Finally, App Store Server Notifications can be configured to tell developers when a parent revokes consent, blocking app launches. To ensure they are ready for these changes, developers must immediately use Apple’s sandbox testing environment to validate these APIs in their apps. For any developers out there finding this to be inconvenient, get used to it. Other regions, such as Utah, Louisiana, and Brazil, are looking at, or have implemented, similar rules.
    • They should show the onedrive recycle bin in a searchable manner and on app not just on the website
    • You looking at a phone or something? On my 4K HDR monitor it is frikking spectacular.
    • The Surface Pro 7+ already has a USB C port which can be used for everything you mentioned, except for eGPUs. Meanwhile, microsoft have gotten rid of ALL of the following that are present in the Surface Pro 7+:
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      230
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      60
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!