Mac OS X 'Leopard'-related Discussion


Recommended Posts

that would be kinda cool but kinda sucky aswell since we would all need new devices to use it which sucks, since you were forced to buy one new to get in favor of the full functionality. they cant do that yet.

apple might release some kind of tablet for multi-touch use but would never entirely add it to the new OS... at least i dont think they would do. ;)

that would be kinda cool but kinda sucky aswell since we would all need new devices to use it which sucks

Quartz Extreme didn't run on all Macs when 10.2 it was released.

64-bit low-level libraries didn't work on all Macs running 10.3 when it was release.

Some fancy eye-candy wasn't enabled for all Macs running 10.4 when it was released.

LCD Cinema displays wouldn't work on all Macs when they were first released either (without the purchase of a $129 VGA -> ADC adapter, and the USB ports still wouldn't work).

They do the same thing with software: If you want to run up-to-date versions of FinalCut or Aperture then you have to be running the latest edition of Mac OS X. Apple has no issues with coupling their products to new technologies.

since you were forced to buy one new to get in favor of the full functionality. they cant do that yet.

Why not? If Apple doesn't include that feature it'll have more to do with the technology being either incomplete or impractical, not because they want their customers to not buy new hardware.

at least i dont think they would do.

Stick around for a few years and you'll think otherwise.

that would be kinda cool but kinda sucky aswell since we would all need new devices to use it which sucks, since you were forced to buy one new to get in favor of the full functionality. they cant do that yet.

apple might release some kind of tablet for multi-touch use but would never entirely add it to the new OS... at least i dont think they would do. ;)

Either they will or won't add it. Adding multi-touch doesn't screw anyone. It's like "Hey, there's this new feature in Leopard that uses this new multi-touch thing. If you were thinking about getting a Mac, get a multi-touch one! If you have a Mac, relax, you can still use a non-touch screen"

With your attitude, we wouldn't have the mouse.

And let's not forget the iPhone Leopard has multi-touch, so if they port it to Mac OS X...I think it's almost certain they will.

Multi-touch on a Mac wont work. Think about it, do you REALLY want to have your arms out all day long when using a computer? Apple would only do it on a tablet Mac. But they have stated they preferred the iPhone over a full blown tablet Mac.

Well, I don't know about any of you guys, but my arms are currently resting on my chairs' arms. But more importantly, you reminded me of something I saw over at Macrumors. Some guy tried designing a multi-touch iMac. So bad looking, but the comments were rather hilarious. Oh and he developed this over 3 threads and got the same comment each time.

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=296711

attachment.php?attachmentid=72427&d=1176645577

Well, I don't know about any of you guys, but my arms are currently resting on my chairs' arms. But more importantly, you reminded me of something I saw over at Macrumors. Some guy tried designing a multi-touch iMac. So bad looking, but the comments were rather hilarious. Oh and he developed this over 3 threads and got the same comment each time.

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=296711

attachment.php?attachmentid=72427&d=1176645577

It's nice but I prefer the current iMac design.

Remember Illuminous? Well, some guy decided to make some mock-ups of what he thinks it would look like.

http://macthemes2.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=16779791

index.php?&act=attach&type=post&id=11595

I always love how anything transparent is shown with no overlapping windows or 2 windows that hardly overlap. I do however like the idea of the flipping preferences like widgets have.

Remember Illuminous? Well, some guy decided to make some mock-ups of what he thinks it would look like.

http://macthemes2.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=16779791

index.php?&act=attach&type=post&id=11595

I always love how anything transparent is shown with no overlapping windows or 2 windows that hardly overlap. I do however like the idea of the flipping preferences like widgets have.

That looks pretty cool, but I think there would be more of a gradient from transparent to non-transparent. Cool idea for preferences, though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!