Mac OS X 'Leopard'-related Discussion


Recommended Posts

My mates Leopard disc that arrived yesterday is 10.5.1, I guess as they roll out each revision they burn that onto the new discs and slowly but surly the 5.0 supply runs dry, a good tactic for keeping people up to date.

I know far too many people (mainly PC users) who're still running Windows XP SP0 and didnt even realise you had to update PCs, no doubt i'll be converting them to Mac users, just give me time

And I've run into even more Mac users who're still running OS X 10.3.9 or w/e and have no idea what "Tiger" or "Leopard" is.

Thanks everyone for your post. I was considering buying Leopard and wondered if the disk in the retail box would be 10.5.1 or I would have to update it myself. Thanks again.

truthfully does it even matter? a brand new leopard install only installs 4 updates... itunes, quicktime, ?????, and 10.5.1... it takes tops 10 minuits from start to finish..

  • 2 weeks later...
Remember leopard takes some time to index everything. That'd explain the "Stuck in the Mudd" feeling.

No, it was just sluggish all the way around - Vista indexes everything too, but it's a different kind of slowness, mainly the HD getting hit, but I always clean install Windows, and after about a week, Vista was happily plugging along. Tiger to Leopard (on a week old system no less) was just bad. Felt like the mouse cursor was lagging, mousing over the dock was slow, slow to open programs, some programs weren't loading correctly...

I haven't experienced any problems with the new install - like Windows, a clean install is definitely the way to go.

The only time an upgrade seems to work smoothly is a clean install of the old OS then IMMEDIATELY upgrade on top of that but.. hardly worth the aggro to be honest :D

Plus, upgrade installs aggravate drive fragmentation thus are GUARANTEED to slow down system performance

Mac OS has defragments all files smaller than 20 MB whenever they're opened.

On my system there are 28 files that are larger than that assuming you ignore the iLife media (which should have been laid down in a single contiguous write when they were installed and wouldn't be touched by the installer anyway).

I think you'll find that's not true, download the demo version of iDefrag and just run the analysis scan, you'll see that 99% of the files on your hard drive are way more then 20MB, for example, system and swapfile.

I defraged a two month old Leopard install last night and got the boot time from 30 seconds to 12 seconds :p

Download the demo version of iDefrag and just run the analysis scan

I did: see the attached screenshot: it lists my system at 0.1% fragmentation (assuming I'm reading its statistics tab correctly).

This is a current-gen iMac (3 GB ram) upgraded from 10.4 to 10.5 two days ago. It has the standard assortment of applications you'd expect to find in a new-media/marketing firm. Photoshop, Illustrator, Compilers, Finalcut, office, etc.

Maybe it's returning bogus information? The product page indicated it wasn't leopard compatible.

you'll see that 99% of the files on your hard drive are way more then 20MB, for example, system

I think you'll find the opposite is true:

Count the number of files in /system large than 20 MB
(me@work : /system)$ sudo find . -name "*" -size +20000k | wc -l
	  17

Count the number of files in /system not larger than 20 MB
(me@work : /Library)$ sudo find . -name "*" -size -20000k | wc -l
  321053

You're off by 5 orders of magnitude.

Other directories like /Library, /bin, /Applications are in a similar state.

and swapfile.

The files in /private/var/vm are created and destroyed as needed: trying to defragment them is pointless. (see: Mac OS X - A Systems Approach) as they won't necessarily exist past the current session never mind across reboots.

For the record, dont run iDefrag on Leopard, as they state on their site this can cause some very nasty problems, instead boot of the iDefrag DVD you burn after buying the product.

My Mac loves defragging. Try a full defrag sometime booting from the dvd

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I don’t get why if I bought the game on the last get I needed to pay $40 to upgrade to the new version in the first place and people who love the game and play a lot would have upgraded already so this is just PR and a chance to grab new players who forgot the game long time ago I think
    • The term "use" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that headline. "Use" can mean opening ChatGPT occasionally to ask for the definition of a word or information about a specific topic. If you frame the question around how many people use it as a daily driver in their work or personal lives, that number is a lot smaller. Those are the people who pay for AI. Nearly everyone else is happy to use it for free, but doesn't see enough value in it to pay for it.
    • No support for Windows Hello!
    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      67
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!