First review of "300"


Recommended Posts

I think they saw it at a pre-screening. It was 99% complete with some of the effects not completed yet.

I got a gut feeling that 500 people didn't watch a pre-screen for one of the biggest movie of the year. Maybe some critics yes, but the rest of the people judged it by the trailer. Which was f*ckin' awesome (Y)

Now that IGN article is fantastic compared to the AICN version, WOW!

If anyone deserves to shoot a Halo movie, its Zack Snyder. This guy appears to be a master artists of cinema.

eh

we'll see.

I watched borat twice, but i wanna watch 300 3 times.

I know for fact this'll probably be the best movie i ever see...

thing is though i knew about this early 2006 before most people had even heard of it, so i'm really looking forward to it.

I know for fact this'll probably be the best movie i ever see...

BOLD statement for never having seen the movie.

I only recently discovered Frank Miller, just before the Sin City movie release. He's quickly becoming one of my favorite story tellers/Artists. Sin City was excellent, but i semi-ruined the movie for myself when i purchased the entire graphic novel collection and read them all. It sort of ruined the experience because i knew everything that was going to happen, and nothing really compares to your minds perspective versus a movie rehash. This time I'm going leave 300 a surprise.

BOLD statement for never having seen the movie.

Sin city's one of my favourite movies.

I've studied the spartans for ages and always admired them as a culture.

I love all greek, roman, whatever movies. I loved troy to death...

the battle of thermopylae kicked ass.

I love the style this films set in,

and every trailer i see is jaw-dropping.

So its not such a BOLD statement as you make it out to be,

and until i see the movie, and decide whether it is or not, you can't speak **** on my opinions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!