First review of "300"


Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

Just saw the movie (today was the official premiere here in Greece :woot: )

It might be a little too soon to write about it since it's only been 2 hours I left the cinema but... I can't help it.

First, this is going to be a controversial movie, no doubt about it. My guess is that there will be people who will absolutely love it and others that will hate every minute. I belong to the first...

It's well known that this is not a historically accurate movie, it's based on a comic book. Taking that into account, I must say I am impressed. The hype is justified.

There are many extremely powerful scenes. Butler is amazing as King Leonidas (his look at the end is something I won't forget soon). The fighting sequences are everything the trailer suggests, quite bloody but not in a disturbing manner. Technically the movie excels, the soundtrack is fitting and powerful. An area the movie could be better, is building up the tension before the battle but that's a minor flaw when everything else works brilliantly.

Just a warning, don't go see it if you want historical accuracy. There are many things here that are fictional and my opinion is that they work extremely well with the tone of the movie. For everyone that has seen the trailer and found it at least interesting, go see it and you won't regret it. Pure cinematic pleasure!

9/10 and a must see (twice) :yes:

post-17196-1173403212.jpg

Just saw a midnight release here over in the US, and I loved it. The story, the action, just everything about it seemed epic. Short movie, but it's constantly moving, and you loose track of time. Anyone who is debating seeing it, I'm telling ya to go, it's amazing.

The Good: Some awesome fights. Truly excellent visuals.

The Bad: Feels hollow emotionally, too much shouting from Leonidas, cliched dialogue, repetitive fight scenes, and too much slow-mo.

The ugly:

I found it darn stupid when the wife kills the *******, and the council finds out who he really is, and t they then shout in a tone that sounds like they just won the biggest battle ever. I expected them to be shocked... not shouting 'TRAITOR!!" in their loudest voice ever. :lol:

7.5/10.

Different type of movies, but Sin City owns this.

The Good: Some awesome fights. Truly excellent visuals.

The Bad: Feels hollow emotionally, too much shouting from Leonidas, cliched dialogue, repetitive fight scenes, and too much slow-mo.

The ugly:

I found it darn stupid when the wife kills the *******, and the council finds out who he really is, and t they then shout in a tone that sounds like they just won the biggest battle ever. I expected them to be shocked... not shouting 'TRAITOR!!" in their loudest voice ever. :lol:

7.5/10.

I saw this at 12:01 this morning. I loved it, even though there were a couple of things I didn't like. I think this movie delivered exactly what it had implied it would deliver -- visceral fighting scenes, incredible visuals, and fantastical story. There isn't a lot of character development. There really doesn't need to be. This story is an interpretation of 300 men that stood against Persia's horde.

As far as cliched dialogue, I really don't agree. I think this movie is a military movie that takes place 2400 years ago. The Spartans defined military life. They lived together, fought together and died together. I think the banter was very appropriate, and probably not far from the mark. I don't know of many other ways to show camaraderie. I loved the levity in some parts. It really illustrated their confidence.

What I found inconsistent or weak:

Leonidas explained that any weakness in the phalanx would endanger them all, and yet they broke ranks and left the terrain that gave them the upper hand.

I didn't like the inclusion of the Ephialtes(the deformed Spartan) and the obvious foreshadowing of inevitable betrayal. I thought this could have been done much better, or could have been excluded completely.

As far as the audience with the council goes:

They were yelling "Traitor" because other council members couldn't see what had fallen to the ground with Theron. They didn't have closed-circuit TV or PA systems back then. ;)

Different type of movies, but Sin City owns this.

Hmmm... Not in my opinion. I think 300 is heads above Sin City. Sin City was boring, probably due mostly to poor editing. It had good performances, but it was not well put together. Add to that the fact that the Stripper never got naked, and you have a disappointing movie. ;) :D

9/10

Excellent movie. The words "Visual Masterpiece" come to mind, Much like when i think of Frank Miller's own graphic novels. If your looking for action, 300 delivers. I found the battle scenes to be quite refreshing and showing of the vast nature of Xerxes' empire. I found the almost "A-sexual" Demi-god Xerxes to be quite interesting. His large size and strong voice gave him believeable symbolic properties of a god-like man. Leonidas himself comes off as a strong King with a never give up attitude. You defiantly get the vibe that these Men truly lived to die gloriously on the battlefield. Even some of the almost comical moments of Leonidas casually eating an apple while his men attend to the Persian wounded, meshed well.

9/10.

Leonidas explained that any weakness in the phalanx would endanger them all, and yet they broke ranks and left the terrain that gave them the upper hand.

I didn't like the inclusion of the Ephialtes(the deformed Spartan) and the obvious foreshadowing of inevitable betrayal. I thought this could have been done much better, or could have been excluded completely.

I agree 100%.

Short movie, but it's constantly moving, and you loose track of time.

You must have been wanting for more, because it was a respectable 125 minutes long.

Well, got to see this in IMAX after my Ethics class. In fact, much of the class my professor was bringing up 300 and I just had to get into a conversation with him about the ethical and moral ways of the Spartans...and the rest of the world at the time, for that matter. Very interesting stuff.

Anyway, I went with a couple friends from class and we highly enjoyed it. The whole pace of the movie was fantastic. 2 hours went by like nothing. I loved the beginning and how they show a Sparta boy from birth to age of man - that part of the Sparta life has always intrigued me. The show I went to was sold out, which at 1130am is pretty rare. Once the final scene went off about half of the audience gave an ovation. Almost all were male - this is truly a man's movie, which would be precisely why my fiance turned her nose up to it, haha!

I loved Sin City but thought this was done just a bit better. It's probably my interest in the era and the Greek philosophy and lifestyle but man, this movie is one of my favorites of all time. Can't wait to see it again. On IMAX of course!

"Hundreds walked away. Just a handful stayed. Only one of them looked back." Probably my favorite scene of the movie and definitely best line.

What I found inconsistent or weak:

Leonidas explained that any weakness in the phalanx would endanger them all, and yet they broke ranks and left the terrain that gave them the upper hand.

I didn't like the inclusion of the Ephialtes(the deformed Spartan) and the obvious foreshadowing of inevitable betrayal. I thought this could have been done much better, or could have been excluded completely.

I dont know about the graphic novel, but there was indeed a greek native who turned traitor and told them the secret passageway. But I agree that the obvious foretelling of it was very weak.

As far as the audience with the council goes:

They were yelling "Traitor" because other council members couldn't see what had fallen to the ground with Theron. They didn't have closed-circuit TV or PA systems back then. ;)

About the council scene. They didnt have to shout like they did in the film. I mean, once of them shouted 'traitor!' and then all the other shouted in unison 'TRAITOR!'. There should have been whispers and faces of bewilderment/shock, instead they yelled as if they conquered the whole world. Worst scene in the film, but yeah it was a minor one but I just had to mention it. :p

Hmmm... Not in my opinion. I think 300 is heads above Sin City. Sin City was boring, probably due mostly to poor editing. It had good performances, but it was not well put together. Add to that the fact that the Stripper never got naked, and you have a disappointing movie. ;) :D

I thought Sin City was much more interesting. It had 3 intertwining stories, which although were predictable fare, were so damn entertaining to watch because of the way things unfolded and also because of the excellent narration. To each his own I guess, 2 different films written by the same author. I apologize for brining Sin City up. :D

Also, anyone felt the blood in 300 was too videogame-ish? They look really nice when you first see them, then they just kind of disappear into thin air, like how videogame blood magically disappear. And I thought the fight scenes were repetitive because there was too much slow-mo. 300 had more slow-mo than all 3 of the Matrix films combined. I bet if it were in real-time the runtime would be only an hour. :p

Good film none-the-less.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a couple to mention, and they still run great on Windows 11 Adobe Lightroom Version 2 Alcohol 120% CLZ Book, Comic, Game, Movie, & Music Collector (PC - No longer sold / Grandfathered in - now mobile apps/online only) DVDDecrypter ISO Buster Pro version 1.9.1 (Still supports HD-DVD too) Nero Burning Rom 8 (Only the burning software, no backup, media converter, etc)   OpenAL (Runtime) - GuildWars 1 Reforged still uses it for 3d headphone audio PowerDVD 12 Ultra SPTD (SCSI Pass through Direct Driver) UltraISO Windows Media Encoder 9 WinImage You can tell I still sport an optical drive    
    • Linux 7.1 arrives with an NTFS overhaul and major hardware performance boosts by Paul Hill The founder of the Linux kernel has just announced the availability of Linux 7.1. This is a stable version of the kernel that will now be tested by various Linux distributions before it is shipped to users through update managers. Some users, like those on Debian, for example, might not get it for a long time, if at all, while Fedora users can expect it in the near future. With Linux 7.1 out on time, the merge window for Linux 7.2 is now open, giving contributors the opportunity to send in major new features that have been waiting for the last two months. Torvalds warned that he is currently travelling and will be in another timezone, so timing for the merge window may be irregular due to timezone differences and limited internet access. Torvalds said that he has already fetched early pull requests to allow him to do some offline work, but the travel could still cause disruption. Right now, he is not planning to extend the release, but did consider it. He said he might later regret not extending, though. In terms of this last week of development for Linux 7.1, Torvalds said there were no major or alarming changes. This week consisted mostly of smaller driver updates to GPU, networking, and sound, networking fixes, trace tooling fixes, and misc minor fixes. The shortlog this week lists fixes for driver bugs, memory leaks, I/O and USB fixes, networking and RDMA fixes, DRM/graphics fixes, and tooling and verification improvements. Specific fixes include USB series heap-overflow and buffer overflow fixes, and multiple use-after-free, memory-leak, and refcount corrections across subsystems such as i2c, zram, gpio, and net. There are fixes for graphics drivers, including amdgpu, i915, and virtio, as well as hypervisor and virtualization tweaks affecting mshv, vmbus, and hyperv. According to Phoronix, anyone running Linux 7.1 should look out for the new NTFS driver, Intel FRED for improved performance on Panther Lake and future CPUs, faster graphics with Intel Arc Battlemage, and improvements for older AMD Radeon GPUs. If you are running Linux on your computer and everything is fine, then you don’t need to worry about updating to Linux 7.1 as a priority; just wait for it to be pushed to you. If you have tried Linux on hardware but it didn’t work properly, trying again with a distro that uses Linux 7.1 could cause Linux to work on your machine, thanks to the new hardware support.
    • you can also do this with this tool: PowerSettingsExplorer made by mbk1969 at 3dguru forum.. I found it by accident researching on modern standby and annoying quirks of it in 2022
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.1 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.1 changelog: Added An option to customize notification sounds (#1259) Fixed Ongoing notification was laggy on Samsung One UI devices (#1269) Improved Updated Translations Minor UI/UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.1 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • watching him because of the Mr Klinton cat
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      139
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!