Your Opinion Of The New LOTR Movie


Recommended Posts

I don't really care if it sticks to the book or not cos you kinda have to build it up more to make it into a movie

"Ian McKellen: Christopher Lee throw out that staff"

"Christopher Lee: Not by the hair on my chinny chin chin!"

see what I mean (disclaimer: that bit about isengard isnt actually in the movie i hear, but they have to make it a damn sight better than in the book considering the calibre of the actors"

I thought it was a great movie as well. MUCH better than the first.

My roommate, however, is a huge LOTR fan, has the books, knows them backwards and fowards, etc. HE said the movie is nothing like the book at all. To use his words, it "shredded" the book. He hated the movie.

But i loved it. :D

there were quite a few things different but PJ said this was the movie that drifted the most from the books, so ROTK should be back to the books more. All i know is they'd better have the BVoice of Saruman chapter in ROTK, that was my fav chapter. Still i stick to my opinion of the movie btut did forget to mention that the books are of course better.

the 500 men to the rescue mattered a little bit, Gandalf mattered a little bit more, but the main thing that broke the orcs/army of darkness was the simple act of the sun rising and hitting them.

ok, not to sound geeky or anything but those weren't orcs, they were uruk-kai and they don't fear sunlight.

Remember what happened at the end of the first movie

ahh I knew somebody was gonna mention this. I almost put it in there, but left it out so I wouldnt sound geeky :blush: uruk-kai made up only a few hundred of the enemy forces at most (the army was at least 10,000) A majority of them were still regular orcs, goblins(?), trolls, tribal men and whatnot.

ahh I knew somebody was gonna mention this. I almost put it in there, but left it out so I wouldnt sound geeky :blush: uruk-kai made up only a few hundred of the enemy forces at most (the army was at least 10,000) A majority of them were still regular orcs, goblins(?), trolls, tribal men and whatnot.

either way they had no problem making their way to rohan during the daylight so it's not like they were afraid of a bit of sunlight.

I don't see why they don't have LOTR action figures,

can u imagine if there was like a gandalf the grey and a gandalf the white version and such ? I'd still get them.

Especially if they had nice detail like todd McFarlane toy style. :woot:

but they do have lord of the rings action figures!

Puts up guard to block sudden punches to the head....

I only liked watching the first movie once. Second time I saw it, I almost fell asleep.

This movie is awesome. The gholum is hilarious as is the dwarf.

And yes, before I edited the post for those who saw it, I did post in the wrong thread.

Wow.

This board really doesn't reflect my opinion of this movie :p I just got back from seeing and I had to add my own two cents.

*spoilers*

The Good:

In terms of cinematic and visual scope - astounding. The camera sweeps and the battles were awesome. I really felt like I was there. Gollum was probably the best aspect of the whole movie (his inner struggle was nicely done). Gimli's comic relief was nicely done too.

The Bad:

After watching it, I just kinda sat there going, "ehh...". I dunno, the first one has this magical appeal to me (seen it 4 times already :D) but this one just kinda fell flat. Maybe I set my expectations too high.

For one, the musical score failed IMO. I could only discern one new musical track... everything else was either from the first or too ambient.

Character development was nil for the new characters. It was too hard to get any feel for them. It just felt like, "here's blahblah, son of blahblah" and that was it. I never read the books and that evil guy who councils the King of Rohan appeared to come out of nowhere. The King's son also had barely any development and there was one other guy that I had NO IDEA who he was the whole movie (he was always around the King, helped put his armor on). The guy from the aint-it-cool website kinda commented on this too. I dunno, I don't think of myself as being too stupid to watch movies and I generally pick this stuff up but I couldn't with "Two Towers". Too many new faces and not enough development.

All the bouncing around kinda threw me off too :\ Granted, they had to do that cuz the fellowship was in pieces but I dunno, if they focused a little less on the action and getting s'more story in place, it would've been more coherent.

I could tell that the main focus was the Helm's Deep battle. While that was awesome, the rest just felt kinda shallow and long winded. The first half was especially slow and the last was all fighting w/ no story to back it all up. What was with Gandalf riding like a holy man in the last scene? He seemed too unreal... not even as human as when he was "the Grey". Where did he find King Rohan's son? How did Rohan's son's army turn that big??? (in the beginning he said only him and his small legion still fought for Rohan). How did they manage to kill off like the remaining 2,000 or so of Sauraman's troops. Why did that Rohan lady fall in love with Aragorn... they only met for like 2 seconds.

I have a feeling that all this is answered in the book but Jackson really hasted things up IMO. I also read somewhere that he cut out the last 100 or so pages and left the cliffhanger. Wonder what he's gonna do about "Return of the King" :\

Maybe I expected too much, but overall, I give it 3.5 stars out of 5.

Character development was nil for the new characters. It was too hard to get any feel for them. It just felt like, "here's blahblah, son of blahblah" and that was it.

The LA Times review had a funny comment about that aspect:

It was during one such eyelid-drooping moment while watching "The Two Towers" that I flashed on an old Gary Larson cartoon that pokes gentle fun at the nomenclature found in books of this sort by contrasting the names we give dogs with those they give themselves. "I am known as Vexog," says one dog (a.k.a. Rex), "Destroyer of Cats and Devourer of Chickens." "I am Zornorph," says another, proudly, "the One Who Comes by Night to the Neighbor's Yard, and this is Princess Sheewana, Barker of Great Annoyance and Daughter of Queen La, Stainer of Persian Rugs."

:D :D

Glad to see positive reviews from both reviewers and those who have watched it. I'll have to wait til next week to see TTT...but I couldn't wait to see it. Peter Jackson have done it again, congratulations to his effort to bring this awesome sequel of LOTR :woot: :yes:

Geek attack!

Firstly, there were no normal Mordor Orcs at the basttle of helms deep, they were all Uruk Hai bred for that specific purpose.

Secondly, since they were Uruk Hai the have no fear of sunlight, however, they do poop themselves of Gandalf when he is shining all brilliant white and waving the flame of Arnor at them :D

Thirdly, the 500 Vs 10,000 is not unrealistic really as Alexander the Great once lead an army of 200 against one of 4000 and won because he had a very defensible position.

Anyone notice the really fake special effect in the movie? not really spoiling anything I don't think, its very obvious when it happens..

like when Legolas swoops around and lands on top of that horse? the audience cheered and clapped when he did that. i thought it was kinda lame to tell you the truth.

Anyone notice the really fake special effect in the movie? not really spoiling anything I don't think, its very obvious when it happens..

like when Legolas swoops around and lands on top of that horse? the audience cheered and clapped when he did that. i thought it was kinda lame to tell you the truth.

heheh the audience did that in my theater too and i thoguht it was also lame.

oh and to the other people whjo were talkin about uruk-hai and etc. dont forget the trees! they helped kill the rest at Helm's Deep ( i know they didnt turn the tide but they were a factor in it), i was so mad they got rid of that in the movie :( Oh and the sunlight more gave the men hope then scared the uruk-hai.

Well people

Just went and saw it again. WOW again, 2nd time is so amazing also.

The crowd wasnt into it as much as the midnight showing i went to but still a good experience.

I really learned to appreciate why they did certain things and how they edited the book also.

If you just take it as a film. Its brilliant. Really fast pace and there are loads of things happening at the same time.

This is definately film of the year. Before I wasnt too sure but now I am.

The 2nd viewing is definately recommended to appreciate the film. :)

Well people

Just went and saw it again. WOW again, 2nd time is so amazing also.

The crowd wasnt into it as much as the midnight showing i went to but still a good experience.

I really learned to appreciate why they did certain things and how they edited the book also.

If you just take it as a film. Its brilliant. Really fast pace and there are loads of things happening at the same time.

This is definately film of the year. Before I wasnt too sure but now I am.

The 2nd viewing is definately recommended to appreciate the film. :)

I'm so glad u said that because after reaidng allthis criticism i ALMOST began to dobut how ubercool the movie was, this reaffirms me though, damn i still cant believe i havent seen it again yet!!!!!! drooooooooool

This is a funny Review for the film.

http://www.juicycerebellum.com/200236.htm

Everyone has their own opinion.... ;)

After receiving over 100 venomous pieces of hate mail in less than 12 hours, regarding this review, I've removed my email address from this page.  My apologies to anybody with a valid opinion........
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      528
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!