Microsoft Starts Banning 360s on LIVE - MS Confirms


Recommended Posts

Microsoft decided to start banning Xbox360 with modified firmwares today.

While it's the same release date as Halo3 beta, it seems that people who didn't download Halo3 also get banned. They probably detect backup discs when you play 'em online (not confirmed yet).

Even people using the new firmwares with disc-jitter added get banned, so it looks like Microsoft found another way to detect it.

Just like on Xbox1 it seems Microsoft bans the console unique ID, not the LIVE user.

cimg0452ir3.jpg

Source: http://www.xbox-scene.com/xbox1data/sep/EE...EuAjENKDCMV.php

EDIT: removed imageshack link, it was dead.

Edited by OhMuffin

Bit of a strange message, you can connect so you have a connection, therefore you're banned (is basically the gist of the message). Whilst I do not condone the modding, that is the worst worded ban notification I have seen, not that I've seen any, but you know what I mean, that could mean anything its very ambiguous, why not say "Dirty rotten scum, you modded so you're banned" or words to that effect keeping within the constraints of the law :)

Edited by BeLGaRaTh
Bit of a strange message, you can connect so you have a connection, therefore you're banned (is basically the gist of the message). Whilst I do not condone the modding, that is the worst worded ban notification I have seen, not that I've seen any, but you know what I mean, that could mean anything its very ambiguous, why not say "Dirty rotten scum, you modded so you're banned" or words to that effect keeping within the constraints of the law :)

But that's exactly what they are. There is no homebrew for the 360, only cheap asses who cant cough up the money to buy hours and hours of entertainment.

Now, I'm just waiting for my idiot friend to get banned. I'm waiting for his "I got banned" message. I've been literally counting the months for it to happen.

But that's exactly what they are. There is no homebrew for the 360, only cheap asses who cant cough up the money to buy hours and hours of entertainment.

Now, I'm just waiting for my idiot friend to get banned. I'm waiting for his "I got banned" message. I've been literally counting the months for it to happen.

Except if he gets banned, he wont be able to send the message (at least via Live), I love what MS have done :) Not before time

But that's exactly what they are. There is no homebrew for the 360, only cheap asses who cant cough up the money to buy hours and hours of entertainment.

Now, I'm just waiting for my idiot friend to get banned. I'm waiting for his "I got banned" message. I've been literally counting the months for it to happen.

Have you told him about this? Or does he know himself? Or are you keeping quiet, hoping he will walk into the trap? :D

Its funny to read the reaction of some people here, condemning the people who modded their console as if they killed someone.

It's funny that some people here, think that stealing games isn't a bad thing. If you have stolen 6 games, you can use that saved money to buy a new Core system and get back on live.

They haven't killed someone, but I hate the idea that someone who has only paid 450 dollars (400 + live) can play every game and then some, when I have paid almost 4 thousand dollars on my system. For basically 1/10th the price, they get to have the same, if not better experience than I have.

Which is why I have no sympathy for them being banned. Good riddance.

i have 2 xbox 360's one i admit is modded but i only play offline with it the other i bought legitimately and plan to use this to play online games, and just as a side note i normally buy the games i download after a week or two, it just fills the gap till pay day @D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      70
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!