Microsoft Starts Banning 360s on LIVE - MS Confirms


Recommended Posts

If you didn't mod your console and got banned, couldn't you just send it in to prove to them it's legit? Would probably even get some free stuff out of the deal for the false accusation. At least I know I would sure as hell demand free stuff.

I'm actually quite willing to do that if it isn't resolved in the next few days. I bought my 360 about 4-5 months ago, brand new. It has never been tampered with.

Won't everyone who has put in the effort to mod a console just buy a new console at Wal-Mart and return the old one?
Quite possible. And this will screw over the next person who gets the box and wonders about the error codes. They might think it is their network connection for a while. Then they will have to convince Microsoft to un-do the ban on the box.

Interesting complications.

Are you banning for things like fan mods, case mods and cooling mods as well? If so, I don't think that's fair at all. Poeple put a lot of work into those, and they shouldn't be banned for just making thier console look better and run better. What is "tampered" in your eyes?

No, it relates to people altering the firmware on the DVD drives I think. It allows discs without copy protection to be run.

well... all I can say is that not even one of the casualties on this war is "innocent" every one and single console that got banned was tampered in some way or another and we already know of a lot of people trying to revert the process... and you know what? you can take us to court whenever you want, we will probe you're lying and we will counter any of those lawsuits and will laugh our asses as hard as we can when you get jail time for all the stupid things you did... go ahead, make my day!

thanks god the system works, somehow but it still works!

note: comment was not refering to any particular member... :shiftyninja:

Just like the Windows Genuine Advantage false positives eh.....

One thing that has me wondering is:

Does Microsoft really think that Live is that important to some people that the threat of getting banned from it will make people go back?

Sooner or later, like with the Xbox, some application like XboxConnect will come out, and getting banned from Live will mean squat.

There's already a better application than XBC. X-Link Kai is starting up strongly.

I don't think there's any justification for the people saying that they are innocent. If there REALLY is a discrepancy, why don't they send back their xbox to MS to check it over, instead of complaining to everyone? To be honest, I don't think MS hardly wins when they ban people. Modders can still play their "back-ups" (:laugh:), have a RENEWED spirit to hack the Xbox FURTHER, and lose a very small portion of the Xbox Gold membership. That really doesn't help the money lost from "back-uped games".

Oh, and I think it's kind of funny how MS only bans the console itself, so that they can still say they have a huge XBL membership. :p

There's already a better application than XBC. X-Link Kai is starting up strongly.

I don't think there's any justification for the people saying that they are innocent. If there REALLY is a discrepancy, why don't they send back their xbox to MS to check it over, instead of complaining to everyone? To be honest, I don't think MS hardly wins when they ban people. Modders can still play their "back-ups" (:laugh:), have a RENEWED spirit to hack the Xbox FURTHER, and lose a very small portion of the Xbox Gold membership. That really doesn't help the money lost from "back-uped games".

Oh, and I think it's kind of funny how MS only bans the console itself, so that they can still say they have a huge XBL membership. :p

They are not trying to get back money from backed up games... They are trying to stop modders from messing up online games for the rest of us.

Take Halo 2 for example - That was fun till all the modders dominated every match.

This is good news, I dont know why anyone would think otherwise... Unless you pirate of course.

They are not trying to get back money from backed up games... They are trying to stop modders from messing up online games for the rest of us.

Take Halo 2 for example - That was fun till all the modders dominated every match.

This is good news, I dont know why anyone would think otherwise... Unless you pirate of course.

See thats what MS wants you to believe. A dvd firmware hacked 360 cant cheat anymore than you console can.

Anyway i shall be back on halo3 soon :)

agreed

No there not, if you were pirating games, MS makes $7 on every game sold for $60...thats there licensing fee, so for every game that you played and did not buy, they lost $7

Then dont buy their product, i really find it hard to belive that people playing backups are not pirating and people playing backups/modding are causing MS money to protect those legitamit users...Everyone who buys a 360 and plans to play it on live ( this is the key here as you can still use your 360) knows that modded consoles or disks is against the EULA, stop trying to get things for free that caused other people to work hard to create

They "didn't earn" those 7 bucks doesn't mean that they lost em. Perhaps the person wasn't going to buy certain games in the first place.

See thats what MS wants you to believe. A dvd firmware hacked 360 cant cheat anymore than you console can.

Anyway i shall be back on halo3 soon :)

thats completely true

when someone finally gets homebrew working on a 360

thats the day i give up Live!

They are not trying to get back money from backed up games... They are trying to stop modders from messing up online games for the rest of us.

Take Halo 2 for example - That was fun till all the modders dominated every match.

This is good news, I dont know why anyone would think otherwise... Unless you pirate of course.

To be completely honest, modding a DVD drive is extremely different from hacking/decompiling/messing around with the contents of the game itself. Regarding to the Halo 2 example, that's more of MS' fault for not being able to detect it. Also, it's not that hard to get rid of people who mod the game itself with the 360, since there's a handy "Report" button.

A dvd firmware hacked 360 cant cheat anymore than you console can.

For now. Who knows what could have been developed in the future? I'm not saying that cheating was the only reason to stop it, or even that it was the primary factor, but Microsoft had to put a stop to it.

They "didn't earn" those 7 bucks doesn't mean that they lost em. Perhaps the person wasn't going to buy certain games in the first place.

Perhaps the person shouldn't have been able to play the games at all then.

To be completely honest, modding a DVD drive is extremely different from hacking/decompiling/messing around with the contents of the game itself. Regarding to the Halo 2 example, that's more of MS' fault for not being able to detect it. Also, it's not that hard to get rid of people who mod the game itself with the 360, since there's a handy "Report" button.

no the mistake made with halo 2 was mainly the fact bungie released the new maps and the update, that didnt get checked for alterations

which was saved onto the HDD in the xbox so it could be altered much easier, that is why you would see so little modding on old maps.

it was still there but you would have to fork out quite a lot for the hard modding of your box whereas you could soft-mod your xbox and run altered maps and games for almost nothing

My friend has not been ban yet i played halo 3 with him yesterday and he has his 360 modded. Well anyways I think all the people saying good ritens are dumb! You act like they are cheating or doing bad for you guys. They payed for Xbox Live just like you guys right? They didn't pay for the game but they did pay for the service that you payed for aswell. I think they shouldn't ban people. It is going to be less people to play wit just remember that guys!

One thing that has me wondering is:

Does Microsoft really think that Live is that important to some people that the threat of getting banned from it will make people go back?

Sooner or later, like with the Xbox, some application like XboxConnect will come out, and getting banned from Live will mean squat.

So are you say that a system that has maybe 1,000 users on at a time can compete with one that has millions?

See thats what MS wants you to believe. A dvd firmware hacked 360 cant cheat anymore than you console can.

Anyway i shall be back on halo3 soon :)

A lot of people don't realize that you CAN hack a 360 game, and this is probably why they brought out the ban stick.

Incase you don't know GoW was hacked. You can edit the config file from the game iso and reburn with your own settings.

My friend has not been ban yet i played halo 3 with him yesterday and he has his 360 modded. Well anyways I think all the people saying good ritens are dumb! You act like they are cheating or doing bad for you guys. They payed for Xbox Live just like you guys right? They didn't pay for the game but they did pay for the service that you payed for aswell. I think they shouldn't ban people. It is going to be less people to play wit just remember that guys!

They are doing the people who buy games legally harm - by pirating them, they push up the price of a game to the end user.

Just remember that!

My friend has not been ban yet i played halo 3 with him yesterday and he has his 360 modded. Well anyways I think all the people saying good ritens are dumb! You act like they are cheating or doing bad for you guys. They payed for Xbox Live just like you guys right? They didn't pay for the game but they did pay for the service that you payed for aswell. I think they shouldn't ban people. It is going to be less people to play wit just remember that guys!

Frankly I don't want to play against somebody who hasn't paid for the game I have.

Oh, and by the way, it's "good riddance." :whistle:

To be completely honest, modding a DVD drive is extremely different from hacking/decompiling/messing around with the contents of the game itself. Regarding to the Halo 2 example, that's more of MS' fault for not being able to detect it. Also, it's not that hard to get rid of people who mod the game itself with the 360, since there's a handy "Report" button.

Actually i would rather avoid hackers completely than have a bad online experience then go to the effort of actually reporting him.

Even before they started banning people I don't think I've seen anybody cheat. In fact, I don't really run into modders anymore in Halo 2. Even though, the less people out there who download their games and cheat the better. For the rest of those that don't cheat and so on, but have a modded console...it's to bad Microsoft can't help somehow.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!