Microsoft Starts Banning 360s on LIVE - MS Confirms


Recommended Posts

If you didn't mod your console and got banned, couldn't you just send it in to prove to them it's legit? Would probably even get some free stuff out of the deal for the false accusation. At least I know I would sure as hell demand free stuff.

I'm actually quite willing to do that if it isn't resolved in the next few days. I bought my 360 about 4-5 months ago, brand new. It has never been tampered with.

Won't everyone who has put in the effort to mod a console just buy a new console at Wal-Mart and return the old one?
Quite possible. And this will screw over the next person who gets the box and wonders about the error codes. They might think it is their network connection for a while. Then they will have to convince Microsoft to un-do the ban on the box.

Interesting complications.

Are you banning for things like fan mods, case mods and cooling mods as well? If so, I don't think that's fair at all. Poeple put a lot of work into those, and they shouldn't be banned for just making thier console look better and run better. What is "tampered" in your eyes?

No, it relates to people altering the firmware on the DVD drives I think. It allows discs without copy protection to be run.

well... all I can say is that not even one of the casualties on this war is "innocent" every one and single console that got banned was tampered in some way or another and we already know of a lot of people trying to revert the process... and you know what? you can take us to court whenever you want, we will probe you're lying and we will counter any of those lawsuits and will laugh our asses as hard as we can when you get jail time for all the stupid things you did... go ahead, make my day!

thanks god the system works, somehow but it still works!

note: comment was not refering to any particular member... :shiftyninja:

Just like the Windows Genuine Advantage false positives eh.....

One thing that has me wondering is:

Does Microsoft really think that Live is that important to some people that the threat of getting banned from it will make people go back?

Sooner or later, like with the Xbox, some application like XboxConnect will come out, and getting banned from Live will mean squat.

There's already a better application than XBC. X-Link Kai is starting up strongly.

I don't think there's any justification for the people saying that they are innocent. If there REALLY is a discrepancy, why don't they send back their xbox to MS to check it over, instead of complaining to everyone? To be honest, I don't think MS hardly wins when they ban people. Modders can still play their "back-ups" (:laugh:), have a RENEWED spirit to hack the Xbox FURTHER, and lose a very small portion of the Xbox Gold membership. That really doesn't help the money lost from "back-uped games".

Oh, and I think it's kind of funny how MS only bans the console itself, so that they can still say they have a huge XBL membership. :p

There's already a better application than XBC. X-Link Kai is starting up strongly.

I don't think there's any justification for the people saying that they are innocent. If there REALLY is a discrepancy, why don't they send back their xbox to MS to check it over, instead of complaining to everyone? To be honest, I don't think MS hardly wins when they ban people. Modders can still play their "back-ups" (:laugh:), have a RENEWED spirit to hack the Xbox FURTHER, and lose a very small portion of the Xbox Gold membership. That really doesn't help the money lost from "back-uped games".

Oh, and I think it's kind of funny how MS only bans the console itself, so that they can still say they have a huge XBL membership. :p

They are not trying to get back money from backed up games... They are trying to stop modders from messing up online games for the rest of us.

Take Halo 2 for example - That was fun till all the modders dominated every match.

This is good news, I dont know why anyone would think otherwise... Unless you pirate of course.

They are not trying to get back money from backed up games... They are trying to stop modders from messing up online games for the rest of us.

Take Halo 2 for example - That was fun till all the modders dominated every match.

This is good news, I dont know why anyone would think otherwise... Unless you pirate of course.

See thats what MS wants you to believe. A dvd firmware hacked 360 cant cheat anymore than you console can.

Anyway i shall be back on halo3 soon :)

agreed

No there not, if you were pirating games, MS makes $7 on every game sold for $60...thats there licensing fee, so for every game that you played and did not buy, they lost $7

Then dont buy their product, i really find it hard to belive that people playing backups are not pirating and people playing backups/modding are causing MS money to protect those legitamit users...Everyone who buys a 360 and plans to play it on live ( this is the key here as you can still use your 360) knows that modded consoles or disks is against the EULA, stop trying to get things for free that caused other people to work hard to create

They "didn't earn" those 7 bucks doesn't mean that they lost em. Perhaps the person wasn't going to buy certain games in the first place.

See thats what MS wants you to believe. A dvd firmware hacked 360 cant cheat anymore than you console can.

Anyway i shall be back on halo3 soon :)

thats completely true

when someone finally gets homebrew working on a 360

thats the day i give up Live!

They are not trying to get back money from backed up games... They are trying to stop modders from messing up online games for the rest of us.

Take Halo 2 for example - That was fun till all the modders dominated every match.

This is good news, I dont know why anyone would think otherwise... Unless you pirate of course.

To be completely honest, modding a DVD drive is extremely different from hacking/decompiling/messing around with the contents of the game itself. Regarding to the Halo 2 example, that's more of MS' fault for not being able to detect it. Also, it's not that hard to get rid of people who mod the game itself with the 360, since there's a handy "Report" button.

A dvd firmware hacked 360 cant cheat anymore than you console can.

For now. Who knows what could have been developed in the future? I'm not saying that cheating was the only reason to stop it, or even that it was the primary factor, but Microsoft had to put a stop to it.

They "didn't earn" those 7 bucks doesn't mean that they lost em. Perhaps the person wasn't going to buy certain games in the first place.

Perhaps the person shouldn't have been able to play the games at all then.

To be completely honest, modding a DVD drive is extremely different from hacking/decompiling/messing around with the contents of the game itself. Regarding to the Halo 2 example, that's more of MS' fault for not being able to detect it. Also, it's not that hard to get rid of people who mod the game itself with the 360, since there's a handy "Report" button.

no the mistake made with halo 2 was mainly the fact bungie released the new maps and the update, that didnt get checked for alterations

which was saved onto the HDD in the xbox so it could be altered much easier, that is why you would see so little modding on old maps.

it was still there but you would have to fork out quite a lot for the hard modding of your box whereas you could soft-mod your xbox and run altered maps and games for almost nothing

My friend has not been ban yet i played halo 3 with him yesterday and he has his 360 modded. Well anyways I think all the people saying good ritens are dumb! You act like they are cheating or doing bad for you guys. They payed for Xbox Live just like you guys right? They didn't pay for the game but they did pay for the service that you payed for aswell. I think they shouldn't ban people. It is going to be less people to play wit just remember that guys!

One thing that has me wondering is:

Does Microsoft really think that Live is that important to some people that the threat of getting banned from it will make people go back?

Sooner or later, like with the Xbox, some application like XboxConnect will come out, and getting banned from Live will mean squat.

So are you say that a system that has maybe 1,000 users on at a time can compete with one that has millions?

See thats what MS wants you to believe. A dvd firmware hacked 360 cant cheat anymore than you console can.

Anyway i shall be back on halo3 soon :)

A lot of people don't realize that you CAN hack a 360 game, and this is probably why they brought out the ban stick.

Incase you don't know GoW was hacked. You can edit the config file from the game iso and reburn with your own settings.

My friend has not been ban yet i played halo 3 with him yesterday and he has his 360 modded. Well anyways I think all the people saying good ritens are dumb! You act like they are cheating or doing bad for you guys. They payed for Xbox Live just like you guys right? They didn't pay for the game but they did pay for the service that you payed for aswell. I think they shouldn't ban people. It is going to be less people to play wit just remember that guys!

They are doing the people who buy games legally harm - by pirating them, they push up the price of a game to the end user.

Just remember that!

My friend has not been ban yet i played halo 3 with him yesterday and he has his 360 modded. Well anyways I think all the people saying good ritens are dumb! You act like they are cheating or doing bad for you guys. They payed for Xbox Live just like you guys right? They didn't pay for the game but they did pay for the service that you payed for aswell. I think they shouldn't ban people. It is going to be less people to play wit just remember that guys!

Frankly I don't want to play against somebody who hasn't paid for the game I have.

Oh, and by the way, it's "good riddance." :whistle:

To be completely honest, modding a DVD drive is extremely different from hacking/decompiling/messing around with the contents of the game itself. Regarding to the Halo 2 example, that's more of MS' fault for not being able to detect it. Also, it's not that hard to get rid of people who mod the game itself with the 360, since there's a handy "Report" button.

Actually i would rather avoid hackers completely than have a bad online experience then go to the effort of actually reporting him.

Even before they started banning people I don't think I've seen anybody cheat. In fact, I don't really run into modders anymore in Halo 2. Even though, the less people out there who download their games and cheat the better. For the rest of those that don't cheat and so on, but have a modded console...it's to bad Microsoft can't help somehow.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!