Recommended Posts

Well, to add my 2c... (well, 5c, theres no 2c coins here anymore...)

So basically you're saying that speeding is safer than not speeding, just because you've had more accidents when sticking to the speed limit. So if we humour your theory that you are more prone to an accident at low speeds, consider this: the slower you and everyone around you are going, the higher the chance of survival in an acident! So you went off the road at ~50km/h and your precious BMW needs some suspension work. That's much better than going off the road at ~80km/h and possibly rolling the car into a tree injuring or killing you. Roads, for the most part, are designed to be safe at a particular speed to all vehicles that travel on that road. Going faster means that under the right conditons, you're gone!

Roads are serious business, most (but not all) accidents occur because people are being tools. Examples include: Talking on the phone while driving, playing "roundabout roulette", drink driving and speeding. There used to be a slogan used by the RTA that read "Safe speeding. There's no such thing."

I'd also just like to say that if it came to it, I'd appreciate if my car (a BMW also if that matters) took $3000 in suspension damage while saving my life. Occupant safety is one thing car manufacturers take into consideration when designing cars! So while yes, $3000 is a lot, it could have been worse given different conditions.

1. Speeding increases your breaking distance.

2. Speeding decreases the amount of time you have to react to a situation.

3. The faster you are going the more severe an incident will be.

Sure, you may have $3000 worth of damage to your car. But at least you walked away from the car accident, which may not be true if you were going 140km/h.

When I first got out of high school I got a job at a car accident reconstruction firm as a "scan boy." All that I did was scan pictures of horrid car wrecks and mangled bodies. Scared me straight.

Even though someone driving at 35mph is twice as likely to kill a pedestrian if they hit them, compared to someone going at 30mph.

This is what a cop once told me, in his words:

"If you ever run someone over, hit him hard enough and do what you can to make sure he's dead. If he survives, you'll have to pay his hospital bills and possibly be forced to give him a monthly payment for the rest of his life. If he dies, you'll only be held accountable for the funeral costs."

Sure, you may have $3000 worth of damage to your car. But at least you walked away from the car accident, which may not be true if you were going 140km/h.

I would never drive 140km/h on that specific road where this happened, that wouldn't be prudent. I would have only driven slightly faster than traffic in this case. It depends on the conditions.

Speed dosent kill. Bad drivers do.

http://members.forbes.com/forbes/2003/0915/224.html

They're safer because they actually ticket those who drive recklessly -- through use of cameras and other means. There was a great History Channel documentary on the Autobahn that explained why it's safer. It's definitely not safer because you can go as fast as you'd like. :rolleyes: Moreover, the roads on the Autobahn are made for speed; those on the US Interstate system ARE NOT made for high rates of speed. The limits are also there to help gas mileage (not so much as it used to be, though).

If speeding doesn't danger you, it dangers everyone else who has to put up with your senseless behavior. Why? Because all you see is what's in front of you, you're not really paying attention to how many people you cut off in your "weaving in and out of traffic". That's where the accidents occur, but you just aren't there to experience them and pay for them.

If speeding doesn't danger you, it dangers everyone else who has to put up with your senseless behavior. Why? Because all you see is what's in front of you, you're not really paying attention to how many people you cut off in your "weaving in and out of traffic". That's where the accidents occur, but you just aren't there to experience them and pay for them.

I never cut people off. I only change lanes if there is enough space, it's safe, and I use my turn signal and flash the brights to warn them. I drive very smoothly, my passengers rarely notice that we're speeding.

"If you ever run someone over, hit him hard enough and do what you can to make sure he's dead. If he survives, you'll have to pay his hospital bills and possibly be forced to give him a monthly payment for the rest of his life. If he dies, you'll only be held accountable for the funeral costs."

That is a pretty dang cruel thing for a cop to say.

This is what a cop once told me, in his words:

"If you ever run someone over, hit him hard enough and do what you can to make sure he's dead. If he survives, you'll have to pay his hospital bills and possibly be forced to give him a monthly payment for the rest of his life. If he dies, you'll only be held accountable for the funeral costs."

Do you have any sense of logic or morals at all?

Faster speed:

-Less reaction time (reaction to other drivers maneuvers/mistakes, or other things on or entering the roadway)

-Force of impact is much greater

No matter your logic you cannot argue these. You might feel more comfortable driving at high speeds because adrenaline is flowing, but it is not safer.

That's not a problem. Speeding tickets are $26 regardless of the speed. That's if they are determined enough to catch me, usually they just back off and figure it's not worth it.
Stay in Mexico, in Canada you would get something like $2000 and no more license after few tickets.

Don't think you are smarter because you drive fast, the day that you will kill a person because the car was too fast to stop in time you will see why there speed limits.

ud have to be a major dumb ass to run back over some one after you it em, if you got caught doing that youd be paying more than the

funeral costs.

In the states, if you hit and killed a pedestrian you run a pretty high risk of being charged with manslaughter (which = prison time). You would basically has to make your case that there was no possible way to avoid the incident. If you were driving "recklessly" (in any which way they can define and prove it) you are screwed.

In a fashion, i agree with what the OP is trying to say...

For one, everyone i know who's ever crashed, has never crashed through speeding, or by any fault of their own... I don't think i know anyone that has crashed through rolling there car off a hill or something.

The thread starter is just ****ed that he had someone crashing into his car, when it was least expected, and probably could have been avoided if he was driving in his usual style.

There is ways and means of speeding, if you are speeding, you have to know the road, its usual points of danger, and the maximum speed for the road.

It also depends on a lot of other factors, e.g. the car, and everything else.

How people think they can drive in fast situations and call themselves good drivers without knowing how there car drives in unusual, and hard conditions is beyond me. So Let me ask you this... your going down a motorway at 70+mph, and u need to stop really, really quick.

Since you've never really pushed the limits before, you have no idea how fast the car will stop, you also have no idea what will happen when you slam the brakes, more than likely ABS will kick in and you will have no where near enough time to stop, and have no idea how the car is going to behave when you need to push the limits.

There will be times when the limits of the car need to be reached, if you dont know where they are and how to react to them, then your ****ed.

Simple.

Speeding aint all bad.. just most people have this stereotypical image of some ###### in their heads that speeds 30+ over the speed limit all the time.. Its not how the majority work, so i don't get why people are so stuck up about it all...

And about reaction times, you should be looking far enough down the road at anyone time to eliminate any sort of difference a reaction time makes.

Stay in Mexico, in Canada you would get something like $2000 and no more license after few tickets.

Don't think you are smarter because you drive fast, the day that you will kill a person because the car was too fast to stop in time you will see why there speed limits.

$2000?? have you ever gotten a speeding ticket? they are usually about $100, but they can go as high as $500 (even though i've never known anyone who got one this high)....we're talking about SPEEDING not DUIs lol

The reason why you feel safer when your speeding is because you're concentrating harder. When you slowed down you lost your concentration. This is just one more reason why you are an awful driver and should be off the public streets. And justifying it by saying a ticket is only $26 proves you don't care about the safety of any one else on the road. People like you only learn the hard way.

When you are speeding you might feel safer and stop accidents happening to your car, but what about the guy behind you who slams on his breaks when you weave infront of him at 140km/h what about him? when he flips his car behind you. Ever look back in your rear view mirror?

Driving is not all about you, you have to be considerate to everyone else on the road. If everyone speeded like you the road would be a lot more dangerous.

hehe...i luv to speed

just recently saved up for my new car...yeh baby an Evo 8.woohoo

last week i did 260km on da highway...i was so beautiful!

im really a fan of drifting...so yeh..thats my ultimate dream..to drift professionally!

until then...im doin the random thing..where i stop nexxt to u..and provoke a race on the streets at night...y?...becos i luv 2

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
    • Around 68% of developers are now using AI to generate code during development, and some experts are saying that a single developer using AI tools can now do the work of an entire team of 4 to 5 engineers.  According to Figma's State of the Designer 2026 report, 72% of designers now use generative AI in their workflows and 91% say it improves the quality of their work, not just their speed.  But does this mean web developers and designers are becoming less relevant, or are they simply evolving into a different kind of role? Would love to hear from developers and designers here has AI made your job easier, or do you feel threatened by how fast these tools are improving
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      179
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!