Recommended Posts

@unimatirxzer0, were till doing update releases, just not this time, there have been so many changes since the feb07 releases based on v5.1 that it calls for removing all previous versions and replacing them entirely with the new core releases

Hi all sorry if i seem a bit thick but i have downloaded the file AutoPatcher_WinXP_May07_x86_ENU_Core but it does not seem to work i am using windows XP SP2 but i get the message

This release may be incompatible with the existing release(s) in the directory you selected

this release is from the 5.6 branch, the existing release(s) are for version 5.1.0.40

do i ignore or is this the wrong version for my system

all help greatfully accepted

thanks

CarDiaC

hi guys, awesome!

Softpedia and TechDomain both say this comes with autopatcher 5.1 - that's not right is it? They should say 5.6 yeah?

well spotted... That will teach me for stealing the "included" part of softpedia's description. Its fixed now, and I am using the description from here. It was the right file version though!

Hello. :cool:

First of all, thank you guys for this lovely and long expected release and for all the hard work you put into it. I have just one quick question, although it's maybe a bit stupid:

Why is my Automatic Updates service started and set to 'automatic' after installing v5.6 of Autopatcher XP?

Was that necessary out of some reason? Thank you in advance.

Cheers and keep up the good work.

Hello. :cool:

First of all, thank you guys for this lovely and long expected release and for all the hard work you put into it. I have just one quick question, although it's maybe a bit stupid:

Why is my Automatic Updates service started and set to 'automatic' after installing v5.6 of Autopatcher XP?

Was that necessary out of some reason? Thank you in advance.

Cheers and keep up the good work.

Just a guess but I think "Windows Update v7" did that, one reason why I didn't install it.

Hi all sorry if i seem a bit thick but i have downloaded the file AutoPatcher_WinXP_May07_x86_ENU_Core but it does not seem to work i am using windows XP SP2 but i get the message

This release may be incompatible with the existing release(s) in the directory you selected

this release is from the 5.6 branch, the existing release(s) are for version 5.1.0.40

do i ignore or is this the wrong version for my system

all help greatfully accepted

thanks

CarDiaC

Remove any previous copies of AutoPatcher you have on your system

Hi all sorry if i seem a bit thick but i have downloaded the file AutoPatcher_WinXP_May07_x86_ENU_Core but it does not seem to work i am using windows XP SP2 but i get the message

This release may be incompatible with the existing release(s) in the directory you selected

this release is from the 5.6 branch, the existing release(s) are for version 5.1.0.40

do i ignore or is this the wrong version for my system

all help greatfully accepted

thanks

CarDiaC

yey, i knew it was a good idea to put that into the new installer :D

the problem is that your trying to install the new core release (based on autopatcher version 5.6) over an older release (based on autopatcher version 5.1)

the solution, uninstall or delete the older copy of autopatcher first then try again

Where is :

Sun Java 2 SE Runtime Environment v6.0 Update 1?

Drivers ASPI v4.71.2?

It is not included!!!!!!!

as someone else said, for sunjava you need to get the 'extras' addon pack

the aspi addon was removed from autopatcher. we had a poll about it over a month ago.

Hi all sorry if i seem a bit thick but i have downloaded the file AutoPatcher_WinXP_May07_x86_ENU_Core but it does not seem to work i am using windows XP SP2 but i get the message

This release may be incompatible with the existing release(s) in the directory you selected

this release is from the 5.6 branch, the existing release(s) are for version 5.1.0.40

do i ignore or is this the wrong version for my system

all help greatfully accepted

thanks

CarDiaC

Thanks for the help all is working fine now :)

Great work... downloading entire package with addons, and extras, and all, tonight...

Good call on separating packages too.

P.S. Now u have time to practice more for driving exam so good luck this time ^^ ;)

i already passed on the 15th :D, third time lucky!

i'we tried autopatcher many times but it never works :blink:

Is there any special version of xp you need ?

no, any edition of xp will do, what happens (or does not happen)?

Wow, impressive. Autopatcher now runs from a UNC path! Yippeeeeeee!!!!!!

A few minor niggles:

I updated one machine today, and then followed up on Microsoft Update.

MS Update found KB923689, which doesn't seem to be included in Autopatcher.

Secondly, KB885626 is always selected for install, no matter how many times I install it.

A few improvements for autopatcher.exe:

1: If all the items in a subtree are coloured blue then colour the subtree line blue too. It kept listing .net framework in black, but when expanded, all the items had already been installed.

2: There's alot of blank space on screen when Autopatcher is installing stuff. It would be nice to see the full text description of each patch in that huge blank space under the progress bar when they are being installed.

Otherwise, great job all round.

Hello Thanks for the New Autopatcher.

But i have a problem:

Attempting to initialize common controls.

Accessing filesystem...

AutoPatcher 5.6 loaded the filesystem.

Detected Dutch (1043) Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2

System Components:

Internet Explorer: 7.0.6000.16441

Windows Media Player: 11.0.5358.4827

.NET Framework: 1.1.4322|1.1SP1|2.0.50727.42|2.0SP0

Windows Installer: 3.1.4000.1823

DirectX: 4.09.00.0904

MSN/Live Messenger: 8.0.812.0

Office Components:

Microsoft Word: 11.0.8134.0

Microsoft Excel: 11.0.8134.0

Microsoft PowerPoint: 11.0.8135.0

Microsoft Outlook: 11.0.8118.0

Microsoft Access: 11.0.6566.0

Microsoft Project:

Microsoft Publisher: 11.0.8103.0

Microsoft OneNote:

Microsoft FrontPage:

Microsoft InfoPath:

Microsoft Visio:

Microsoft SharePoint Designer:

Microsoft Groove:

Module 'Windows Update v7' (unique id: 'WU7_X86') reports 'WINDOWS_COMPONENTS_PARENT_ENU' as its parent, but such module does not exist or is not loaded in the right order.

What can i do?

Allready downloaded autopachter a several times from different websites.......... and installed windows update v7

Thanks

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!