Recommended Posts

prandal:

KB885626: AP english have this:

[installation]

"Module:\WindowsXP-KB885626-v2-x86-enu.exe" /quiet /norestart /overwriteoem

AP pt-br have this:

[installation]

"Module:\WindowsXP-KB885626-v2-x86-ptb.exe" /quiet /norestart /o

it does install in pt-br. you may turn your AP unofficial by doing that, but try edit KB885626_xp_enu.apm with notepad and replace /overwriteoem by /o only and try install it. if it works, please report. i've already notice that behavior some time ago and it solved

EDIT:

possible issue found. i'm currently choosing AP english also a translation pack and i've notice an issue with module flashplayer_IE_enu.apm

it says:

[installation]

"Module:\install_flash_player_active_x.msi" /S

but at module folder, it have install_flash_player_active_x.exe, so, i believe that it will not works. flashplayer_notIE_enu.apm has the same issue

Edited by supermouse

Hi! AutoPatcher has stopped with message:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What AutoPatcher was trying to do

It appears that the error occured while AutoPatcher was trying to set folder variables through filesystem.

Where: mdlInitialization.Main()

Error Code: 0x174: Failed to load control 'RichTextBox' from RICHTX32.OCX. Your version of RICHTX32.OCX may be outdated. Make sure you are using the version of the control that was provided with your application.

Attempting to initialize common controls.

Accessing filesystem...

AutoPatcher 5.6 loaded the filesystem.

Detected English (1033) Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2

System Components:

Internet Explorer: 6.0.2900.3059

Windows Media Player: 11.0.5721.5145

.NET Framework: 1.1.4322|1.1SP1|2.0.50727.42|2.0SP0|3.0.04506.30|3.0SP0

Windows Installer: 3.1.4000.1823

DirectX: 4.09.00.0904

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Previous version was completely deleted.

What can I do?

I came across the AutoPatcher two weeks ago when I was looking for a solution for a PC I have in South Africa where my family lives where broadband is too expensive and even dial-up is charged as a local call which is cahrged by the minute. I was looking for a solution to update my PC when I visit them each summer without having to pay a fortune in Internet connection fees.

So 2 weeks ago, I found your GREAT product and tried it on an old PC I was rebuilding for my son. What a great idea. You guys have really done a great job. And I should know, I work in an IT department.

Well, I have just downloaded the new May edition and will be testing that on my old computer (I just reinstalled it from scratch to be able to test the new AutoPatcher).

I just have one question: What was the reason for the Core and Addon separation?

Keep up the great work guys.

As soon as I have tested the full install on my reinstalled (up to SP2) old PC, I will be glad to report my findings.

Windows Defender now have localized versions. so, his folder need be adapted to each language that have one. a few things may change due localized versions too, like:

english:

[DetectionRegistry]

KeyValue=1.1.1593.0

localized pt-br

[DetectionRegistry]

KeyValue=1.1.1593.21

it have uninstall too (it appears be missing in english , but it's just a minor issue, like the other ones):

[Removal]

MsiExec.exe /qn /X{A06275F4-324B-4E85-95E6-87B2CD729401}

edit:

WindowsUpdate_x86_files folder have WindowsUpdateAgent20-x86.exe too, that is no longer choosed to install

Edited by supermouse
Secondly, KB885626 is always selected for install, no matter how many times I try to install it.

I had a similar issue with KB887472, on my home PC too.

Manually downloading and installing both of them solved the problem.

I'm still no wiser as to why AutoPatcher couldn't install them.

Is there an AutoPatcher log file created by default, and if so, where is it hidden?

doesn't work for me. HELP!?

starting autopatcher:

Loading Progress

Loading modules... done

Verifying release integrity... done

Generating tree... you have downloaded the wrong release

I have XP pro with SP2 installed

Do you have an English copy of Windows?

@prandal, KB887472 and KB885626 have the exact same issue. booth will works only if you manually edit that modules and replace that /overwriteoem by /o. someone at ms did some mess in this ones and it says that works with /overwriteoem but doesn't. you may see that running this ones by command line without that /quiet option

but don't worry. this thing happends and for for sure it will be fixed, also any other issue that may be found at any release ;)

[]s

Sorry if I missed it, but in the previous version of Autopatcher, there was an option to "Allow Windows to keep hotfix backups for uninstall". I usually uncheck this box.

(see screenshot at http://enscreenshots.softonic.com/s2en/360...137/0_auto2.gif )

I didn't see the same option in the new version.

Thanks.

Thanks to all who made this great program possible!

I started using it with the February release and it has made my life so much easier! I have a computer repair shop next to a major University and I am forever re-installing Windows XP on these kid's machines. Autopatcher has saved me a lot of time!

One question about the new May release: It seems that some updates or maybe they're add-ons that were included in Feb. release are not in May's, such as the extra Themes and Wallpapers (like Royal).

If these are available as an add-on, will you explain how to incorporate them into Autopatcher before I burn it to a CD for use in other systems?

Thanks much!

Thanks for the reply!

Not meaning to sound too dense, by "over the top of the Core" do you mean replace the "add-on" folder in the "Modules" folder?

I don't have the new version installed yet, so I'm looking at the Feb. release in my program files. What you may be saying is that the new release doesn't have an "add-on" folder under Modules, and I need to download and install the add-on to the module folder, correct?

I'm sure I'm making this much harder then it needs to be :)

These three are not included:

Update for Windows XP (KB934238)

February 2007 CardSpace Update for Windows XP (KB925720)

Security Update for Flash Player (KB923789)

as WindowsXP-KB929338-x86

Regards,

After testing this latest AutoPatcher 5.6 (I downloaded all the addons and created a full Official Release - but did not load them at this stage to my PC), and after connecting the PC to the Internet and running Windows Update, I found the same 3 updates that "mocko" found, not included in the AutoPatcher.

Also, the following was update not included (I did use the Windows Genuine Advantage (KB892130) from AutoPatcher):

Windows Genuine Advantage Notification (KB905474)

On the AutoPatcher side, I have the following updates that are still showing up as part of the critical update, but they do not update:

On Critical Updates:

Critical Update for Windows XP (KB885626 v2)

Security Update for Windows Messenger (KB887472) - This could be because I chose to remove Windows Messenger and add Windows Live Messenger.

On Rrecommended Updates:

Update for DRM-enabled Media Players (KB891122) - I selected Windows Media Player 10 during the update process - I do not know if this may be the reason.

Update for Windows XP (KB889673)

Fix for WMF files (KB921108)

European Union Expansion Font Update

I hope that this information is usefull to the AutoPatcher Team.

I want to THANK YOU guys for a great job!!!!

If there is anything else I can do for you guys to assist you with any testing, just let me know.

>> Sorry if I missed it, but in the previous version of Autopatcher, there was an option to "Allow Windows to keep hotfix backups for uninstall". I usually uncheck this box.

> @stinkybum, no longer needed, we no longer remove backups

Okay, so if I don't want the backups, I just delete all the C:\Windows\$NtUninstall* directories? Thanks again.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!