Recommended Posts

I have never once had an Apple app crash Windows, but I've certainly had Microsoft apps act really screwy on OS X. And one of the biggest gripes that people had about the iPhone (no support for custom apps) was put to rest. I love the new Finder and the Dock has needed a refresh for ages now.

iTunes crashes EVERY time I plug in my iPod, without fail. In fact, it brings down most of my system. Host processes all fail, Aero fails, the system falls flat on it's face. No other software on my computer crashes every single time like iTunes does. Hell, I rarely have a crash other than iTunes.

The biggest gripes among people who aren't just Apple fanboys is that the actual cellphone technology in it is all out of date. Sure, the hardware is nice, but it lacks everything phones are coming out with today. I have phones that are a year or two old that have newer technology than it has. And Web 2.0 + AJAX for 3rd party apps? That's a joke. I really was hoping Apple would revolutionize with this. They certainly had the power and money to put into it, but I don't see the iPhone going anywhere at all until the next version comes out. They focused too much on "ooo ahh" and not enough on functionality. It's going to be a novelty that wears off in a week.

I do like some of the new features, the dock updates are nice, but half the things he showed we'd already known about or he'd even shown last year. Thus my comment of it being a weak WWDC.

Safari on Windows Screenshot

:x

Personally I think the only reason for Apple is to release this for Windows is to promote Mac OS X software and try to make people switch over. So when they do they'll find that Safari looks basically exactly the same on Mac OS X as it did on Windows. If they would turn Safari into an "Aero application" they would destroy that effect.

Just a theory.

Last MacWorld Expo was a let down because of all the talk about iPhone and little bit about Leopard. Today, more talk about "the same features" of Leopard and again, talk about iPhone.

It's the only product Apple are doing right now. That's it. Nothing else. Nada.....

iTunes crashes EVERY time I plug in my iPod, without fail. In fact, it brings down most of my system. Host processes all fail, Aero fails, the system falls flat on it's face. No other software on my computer crashes every single time like iTunes does. Hell, I rarely have a crash other than iTunes.

Then it sounds like you have something really screwed up on YOUR system. I never once had iTunes crash like that when I was using it on Windows, even on betas of Vista.

The biggest gripes among people who aren't just Apple fanboys is that the actual cellphone technology in it is all out of date. Sure, the hardware is nice, but it lacks everything phones are coming out with today. I have phones that are a year or two old that have newer technology than it has.

I wonder if the recent patent problem with Qualcomm chips (which are in the majority of 3G phones) has anything to do with it? Perhaps the people designing the iPhone saw it coming (the lawsuit has been in the works for a while now). Read here for more info on this: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showA...SSfeed_IWK_News

I've been playing around with Safari for Windows and for the most part, I quite like it. It is a bit dark but the speed it loads pages is certainly better than Firefox 2.0. It also pass the ACID2 test for those who wish to know, previously only Opera was available for it on the Windows side. All in all, I'm going to enjoy delving a little deeper into Safari.

Scirwode

Then it sounds like you have something really screwed up on YOUR system. I never once had iTunes crash like that when I was using it on Windows, even on betas of Vista.

I'm gonna go with a no on that one. Not one other piece of software or hardware has a problem on my computer except iTunes, and you're right, back in the betas it worked fine, then when Vista went final, Apple had to release a new version to "update Vista issues" and ever since then, it's always crashed. It's like they did it to try to make Vista look bad. Now, I don't honestly believe it, it's just a nice coincidence. And yes, the majority of people have issues with iTunes on Windows, if nothing other than the drawing bug in Vista where it pops up completely black every so often.

I wonder if the recent patent problem with Qualcomm chips (which are in the majority of 3G phones) has anything to do with it? Perhaps the people designing the iPhone saw it coming (the lawsuit has been in the works for a while now). Read here for more info on this: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showA...SSfeed_IWK_News

Not likely since the iPhone's 3G would have been HSDPA, not WCDMA or EV-DO which the ban is on.

I have to stand corrected now I looked at some of the screen shots and quicktime previews. Mac OS X Leopard's UI actually looks really nice, extremely clean and finally consistent without appearing dull and boring (like UNO imo).

As I thought the Apple TV's Front Row made it into Mac OS X as well. (Y)

iTunes crashes EVERY time I plug in my iPod, without fail. In fact, it brings down most of my system. Host processes all fail, Aero fails, the system falls flat on it's face. No other software on my computer crashes every single time like iTunes does. Hell, I rarely have a crash other than iTunes.

The biggest gripes among people who aren't just Apple fanboys is that the actual cellphone technology in it is all out of date. Sure, the hardware is nice, but it lacks everything phones are coming out with today. I have phones that are a year or two old that have newer technology than it has. And Web 2.0 + AJAX for 3rd party apps? That's a joke. I really was hoping Apple would revolutionize with this. They certainly had the power and money to put into it, but I don't see the iPhone going anywhere at all until the next version comes out. They focused too much on "ooo ahh" and not enough on functionality. It's going to be a novelty that wears off in a week.

I do like some of the new features, the dock updates are nice, but half the things he showed we'd already known about or he'd even shown last year. Thus my comment of it being a weak WWDC.

If anything I see this cell phone technology as a push towards the future. There's a huge shift towards rich internet applications. That's why Adobe's AIR, JavaFX, WPF have being developed as a the future of desktop apps. I think that problem is that people are oversimplifying the technology as just "web 2.0 + AJAX". I've never seen "web 2.0 + AJAX" be able to use a computer's dialing capabilities before. Clearly, the iPhone is allowing that and more which is outside the score of just "web 2.0 + ajax".

To me, the whole idea of deploying web apps that have low-level access to the platform that they run on is quite revolutionary. It's also the way the otehr companies like Microsoft/Adobe/Sun are going. Not to mention that this will encourage more entry into developing apps for the iPhone (less of a learning curve) and a more centralized approach to delivering software.

Although, I'm still wondering what happens when you lose signal. Does that mean no access to your app?

Safari is lightning quick - I like it a lot :) Also, it doesn't even look like the screenshot posted earlier - It looks a lot nicer.

Indeed it does. And I'm sure people who like to customise their desktops to look like Mac OSX would be happy :shifty: :whistle: :laugh: !

Scirwode

I've just watched the demos of Leopard on Apple's site and they show it off very well. The look is great, the dock with Stacks keeps clutter at bay, and Finder really does impress me more than the current one as finally it has preview built in :) It also comes with Coverflow for flicking through doc's and files. A nice touch that.

Quicklook is promising.

If anything I see this cell phone technology as a push towards the future. There's a huge shift towards rich internet applications. That's why Adobe's AIR, JavaFX, WPF have being developed as a the future of desktop apps. I think that problem is that people are oversimplifying the technology as just "web 2.0 + AJAX". I've never seen "web 2.0 + AJAX" be able to use a computer's dialing capabilities before. Clearly, the iPhone is allowing that and more which is outside the score of just "web 2.0 + ajax".

To me, the whole idea of deploying web apps that have low-level access to the platform that they run on is quite revolutionary. It's also the way the otehr companies like Microsoft/Adobe/Sun are going. Not to mention that this will encourage more entry into developing apps for the iPhone (less of a learning curve) and a more centralized approach to delivering software.

Although, I'm still wondering what happens when you lose signal. Does that mean no access to your app?

They are cached locally, so you at least won't have that issue. Of course anything that needs access to the internet won't work, but that's obvious.

I understand what Web 2.0 and AJAX can create. I'm a web developer myself, and you can make very nice web apps with the two, however there are most certainly limitations. Plus, apps will be inherently slower being that they are now web pages. This is very similar to Microsoft throwing out the WPF enabled sidebar for a similar HTML only sidebar. Sure, nice little gadgets can be made, but they are nothing compared to what the sidebar could have and should have been.

I'm more worried about the lack of 3G though. I don't care if it has Wifi, that doesn't help you driving down the highway when you want to jump on and check something. A lot of places are pay per use wifi, and I'll be damned if I'm going to pay to use wifi on my little phone. 3G is such an standard option now that that is honestly what's going to push me away from the iPhone more than anything else. Not to mention the price and contract issues. I just wish they would have developed the iPhone to it's fullest extent, but I think that they are doing it purposfully to be able to justify a new version in a short amount of time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!