3 new performance and reliability updates for Windows Vista


Recommended Posts

Has there been a fix or work-around to installing Update for Windows Vista (KB941649):??

This is similar to the update pack that came out a few months ago that made the system log off immediately after logging on (because a folder in teh firewall folder was missing or something)

This update rendered my system unbootable but i really want to install the update, come on people figure something out!

The other two updates work fine.

I haven't had a problem except that my HD was reported as 5.7 in Windows Index, and afterwards is reported as 4.4 (haven't a clue why it changed):( My whole system chugs along now, though it does boot faster, but that's hardly a bonus in the circumstances :)

I may just format again and reinstall. Think I need that anyway :)

That is not a common error code, and from what I can find, there is no documentation from MS about it.

I'm guessing one of these:

1. Badly pirated copy of Vista (no offense, I'm not accusing you)

2. WGA validation got screwed up, you need to validate again

3. The Windows Update data store got corrupted

First, visit http://www.microsoft.com/genuine and click Validate Windows. Try the updates again.

If that doesn't work, then try this:

Open an elevated command prompt. (Go to Start -> Programs -> Accessories, right-click on Command Prompt, and choose "Run as administrator".)

In the command prompt window, run the following two commands:

net stop wuauserv

rmdir /s C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\DataStore

Don't close the command prompt window yet.

Rename the C:\Windows\WindowsUpdate.log file to some other name. (This isn't actually necessary, but will make it much easier to distinguish if WU is working properly after the fix)

Run the Registry Editor. (Go to Start -> Run, type "regedit" and press Enter.)

***Be careful, you can screw up your system if you make a mistake here***

In the Registry Editor tree, find HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\WindowsUpdate.

Right-click on WindowsUpdate in the tree and choose Delete.

Back in the command prompt window, run this command:

net start wuauserv

You can now close the command prompt window and the Registry Editor window.

Now run the Windows Update control panel. You'll be prompted to opt back into Microsoft Update and to reset your automatic-updates settings. The first "Checking for updates..." cycle will take longer than usual, since the data store needs to be rebuilt. Any previously-hidden updates (such as language packs) will be shown again and will need to be re-hidden.

If the problem was indeed a corrupted datastore, then you should find that

updates are now successfully detected. If not, then you should at least be no

worse off than you were.

Thank you for your time! I really appreciate that! I'm afraid though that none of the solution worked. I'm still getting the failed message. I passed the validation and deleted those Windows Update files, but it didn't work. I think that is really, really strange...

My Vista with Gigabyte P35-DS4 and Intel ICH9R chipset doesn’t boot anymore after the update, it hangs at crcdisk. After replacing all .sys-files in the drivers directory with the originals it works again.

Same here that's the file that loads last before the freeze.

I haven't had a problem except that my HD was reported as 5.7 in Windows Index, and afterwards is reported as 4.4 (haven't a clue why it changed):(

Hmmm, crcdisk fails to load for some of us and you have slow hard disk performance. Sounds like they messed something up here.

Same here that's the file that loads last before the freeze.

Hmmm, crcdisk fails to load for some of us and you have slow hard disk performance. Sounds like they messed something up here.

This is not the reason for the failure of the boot. I had the same thing, at first I deleted the crcdisk.sys file so the boot failed at another file. The system doesn't fail to load a driver, I think it just hangs because of one driver. Because I didn't have a restore point, I reinstalled my Vista. Now I'm afraid to install those updates...

Anyone contact Microsoft with this info???

that worked for updates that fail to install; however, i don't think it will do anything for people who install the updates successfully and a reboot later they're stuck on the loading screen.

After I executed this code, the updates installed! I found it somewhere on a Dutch forum.

fsutil resource setautoreset true c:\

What exactly does fsutil resource setautoreset true c:\ do to C: drive?

PG2 only breaks on 64-bit version of Vista due to driver signing enforcement and changes made to it by a windows update a few months ago. Until the PG2 team gets driver signatures from Microsoft, it will only work with driver enforcement turned off by using F8 at startup.

PG2 only breaks on 64-bit version of Vista due to driver signing enforcement and changes made to it by a windows update a few months ago. Until the PG2 team gets driver signatures from Microsoft, it will only work with driver enforcement turned off by using F8 at startup.

That's annoying, lol.. well i'm glad I haven't switched over to 64-bit Vista from XP 64-bit yet.

I use that program 24/7 and F8 at startup would be annoying everytime I boot to make it work.

PG2 hasn't updated their program in a while, I doubt it'll be fixed soon then.

Its not annoying if you leave your system on 24/7. I only restart my PC every few weeks so the one or two times I do it per month doesn't bother me.

I doubt the PG2 team will release a driver signed version anytime soon since the driver signing costs lots of money.

I'm starting to wonder if these patches are responsible for several sporadic DEP crashes. I've lowered DEP to monitor only essential Windows services and applications, and the Sync Center occasionally crashes due to DEP.

Also another thing: I swear file transfers are slower after applying these patches. :huh:

same here nothing new, OS is still the same speed as it was no change in the WEI either

@ Bel: Hello stranger

Been offline a week, stupid virgin. But I am back in insult mode now :) wait and see ...

/back on topic, does anyone know what the difference is between the original release and this v2 release?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The useful lapdogs  
    • Nobody is buying a PS5 only for playing Until Dawn 2. Their loss.
    • If you actually used it instead of responding like a petulant child you might be surprised. I switched from Google some time ago and have been very satisfied.
    • I am one of the first people to use the DXVK technology. In the channel below you can see some videos that I have made using this technology, including Assassin's Creed Odyssey. https://www.youtube.com/@nahum7995/videos Assassin's Creed Odyssey experienced several bugs and technical issues during its first months after release. It launched with its own fair share of funny but frustrating glitches. I ran it on DXVK 9 days after its release and I played it for many hours but didn't see a single significant bug on Linux. Assassin's Creed Odyssey is widely celebrated for pushing the franchise in bold new directions and specifically for nailing several elements better than any other title in the AC series: Player Choice & Branching Narrative, The Mercenary & Cultist System, Mythological Integration, Overpowered Combat Abilities, Open World Exploration But what I'm trying to point out is that this game wasn't quite playable on most windows systems, until a few months after its release when most of the bugs were fixed. However, on Linux it ran completely flawless from day one, although DXVK had seen little development and refinement at the time. What do you think the situation will be in 2026 now that most bugs and glitches of DXVK have been completely eliminated? This is information from Google about these situations that I am quoting. In many cases, using DXVK (a translation layer that converts DirectX 9, 10, or 11 into Vulkan) can result in more stable frame times and higher performance than native Windows rendering. This happens primarily by bypassing driver overhead and multithreading draw calls that were previously restricted to a single CPU core. Older APIs (like DirectX 9 and 11) are largely single-threaded on the CPU side. DXVK translates these calls to Vulkan, which is highly multi-threaded. This reduces CPU-bound stuttering on weaker processors. In certain cases, GPU manufacturers (especially AMD) have significantly better and more modern Vulkan drivers than they do for legacy DirectX. Vulkan gives developers—and in this case, the translation layer—closer control over how resources are held in VRAM. This can prevent micro-stutters and sudden frame drops during chaotic gameplay. Yes, certain games, particularly older DirectX 9 to 11 titles, can run with fewer crashes on DXVK than on native Windows. By intercepting DirectX draw calls and translating them into the modern, highly efficient Vulkan API, DXVK bypasses the limitations and poor driver support that cause instability in aging game engines. PlayStation 1, PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 can be easily and perfectly emulated on Linux. In fact, modern Linux emulators offer high-performance upscaling, widescreen patches, and automatic controller mapping out of the box.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 PlayStation 1/2/3 games look drastically better on Linux thanks to resolution upscaling. Furthermore, it is also a fact that you cannot play many fun games on Windows either, isn't it? - The Nintendo Switch has an extensive library of exclusive games. - PlayStation has an extensive library of exclusive games - Android has "mobile-exclusive" games, meaning they are exclusive to mobile devices (iOS and Android) and aren't available on PC or consoles. And finally, it is also the case that in the next five years there will be games that millions of people will say you absolutely must play and that they want to play this specific game that released a few days ago. However, the other side of this story is that currently, absolutely no one cares that they cannot play these upcoming games right now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!