added 9 June 2010  

996 members have voted

  1. 1. How did you find Neowin?

    • A Google (Search) Result
      505
    • From a friend/acquaintance
      137
    • At work
      26
    • By a news story
      78
    • From TV/Radio
      3
    • Link exchange / Linked from another site
      212


Recommended Posts

On 6/2/2019 at 12:18 AM, mado said:

Just found this online whilst I was trying to identify a logo on a vintage car door ashtray.

Can anyone identify this ? It is a swivel door ashtray with what looks like a radiator in the middle and wings each side.

Your help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers 

 

 

Welcome to Neowin!

 

We actually have an auto-related section. You might be able to find someone who recognizes your object by posting a new topic about it there since it seems to be a car part:

 

https://www.neowin.net/forum/forum/146-the-neobahn/

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I honestly cannot remember how I found Neowin but damn, I remember this look very well.

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20010529162030/https://www.neowin.net/

https://web.archive.org/web/20020121210557/http://neowin.net/

  • Like 2
On 7/20/2019 at 3:49 PM, vf- said:

I honestly cannot remember how I found Neowin but damn, I remember this look very well.

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20010529162030/https://www.neowin.net/

https://web.archive.org/web/20020121210557/http://neowin.net/

Oh yeah! I remember the second link very well. Times and technology have changed throughout the years. Thanks for the retro reminder! (Y)

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I don't remember exactly how or when I stumbled into Neowin, but I remember that after Windows XP's RTM I followed a few websites regularly reading on XP/Microsoft related developments and news. 

But the definite news piece I remember that got me hooked on this website was the coverage Tom did about the leak of Windows 2000 source code. 😅 Ever since, I visit this website almost daily but didn't register as a member until 2008, mostly because my background is finance, I did not have many answers to be posted on the forums. Rather, forums were helping me much. A long time has passed since I found Neowin, but this site is my "go to" website for tech updates. Thanks 😊

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Oh boy that was such a long time ago.... I was neck deep into downloading Windows XP betas... actually then I wonder if it wasn'T alphas.... bah, whatever. Regardless, I frequented IRC and got pointed to this site, and well, ever since then...

  • 4 weeks later...
On 12/24/2019 at 7:19 AM, Farchord said:

Oh boy that was such a long time ago.... I was neck deep into downloading Windows XP betas... actually then I wonder if it wasn'T alphas.... bah, whatever. Regardless, I frequented IRC and got pointed to this site, and well, ever since then...

The fun days :) I miss those.. To me, those were the golden days for Microsoft. Fun Whistler builds.. hmm.. did 2211 ever leak ;)

 

Edit: Well, it sure it!

https://betawiki.net/wiki/Windows_XP_build_2211

 

I know what I'm doing tonight! 

 

Longhorn 3663 still never leaked.. That's insane how that build never leaked, lol 

 

But for ###### n gigs.. I remember when 3718 leaked.. it leaked AFTER 4008, which wasn't very stable. Everyone wanted 3718 because they heard rumors that it was very stable (for an alpha anyway). Then someone stole the ISO from WinBeta and it was released by xBetas!. ahhhhh!!! The fun days of IRC, haha. 

4 minutes ago, fusi0n said:

The fun days :) I miss those.. To me, those were the golden days for Microsoft. Fun Whistler builds.. hmm.. did 2211 ever leak ;)

 

Edit: Well, it sure it!

https://betawiki.net/wiki/Windows_XP_build_2211

 

I know what I'm doing tonight! 

 

Longhorn 3663 still never leaked.. That's insane how that build never leaked, lol 

I sure miss those days.

I bookmarked a few of sources for Windows XP visual styles. I forgot about most sites when social media consolidated/cannibalized everything into a handful of platforms. They have gotten too big and too noisy so I've started remembering the rest of the internet I used to know.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!