Kotaku is stealing my Pics


Recommended Posts

IMHO $200 is too low....First they steal your pictures and use them on their site, second, they make money on their site and indirectly off your pictures, third, they purposely crop the picture so that it doesn't show the amateur date the pictures were taken, fourth they offer a bogus $200 to shut your mouth. I would demand more and threaten them that if I don't get the amount I want, I will not only go even more public but slap them with a lawsuit, expose them and seek out to ruin them. It is so enraging to see how easily people get away with some things...

IMHO $200 is too low....First they steal your pictures and use them on their site, second, they make money on their site and indirectly off your pictures, third, they purposely crop the picture so that it doesn't show the amateur date the pictures were taken, fourth they offer a bogus $200 to shut your mouth. I would demand more and threaten them that if I don't get the amount I want, I will not only go even more public but slap them with a lawsuit, expose them and seek out to ruin them. It is so enraging to see how easily people get away with some things...

Since you seem to know so much, how much would a normal freelancer expect to get from 2 relatively blurry pictures with an "amateur time stamp" in the corner? I think this whole thing was a bit of a misunderstanding and Kotaku have been very nice about it. Prince made some money he wasn't intending to, Kotaku avoided a bad publicity stint and everyone's happy...

The coverage this got seems a bit over the top to me.

I think they did wrong and were obviously trying to cover their tracks by editing the pictures etc but in reality everyone does this these days and unless it's a professional picture then I can't really see the big deal.

The coverage this got seems a bit over the top to me.

I think they did wrong and were obviously trying to cover their tracks by editing the pictures etc but in reality everyone does this these days and unless it's a professional picture then I can't really see the big deal.

It isn't their property though, it doesn't matter if "everyone does this," that doesn't make it right though.

It isn't their property though, it doesn't matter if "everyone does this," that doesn't make it right though.

I think he means stories like this dont usually get this much coverage.

like he said it happens everyday, and while that doesnt make it right, you dont usually get this much press coverage about every story like this.

Glad he got it sorted though :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple reluctantly forces strict new age checks on Texas users starting today by Paul Hill Apple will begin enforcing the Texas Age Assurance Law (SB 2420) following a recent court ruling that lifted an injunction on SB 2420. Starting June 4 (today), Apple will enforce strict age-verification and parental-consent rules for new Apple accounts created in Texas. This move will affect children under 18 who go to download apps or attempt to make in-app purchases. Apple previously expressed privacy concerns related to this law, but compliance is now mandatory for the company, nevertheless. Apple will use several APIs to follow the law. Principally, the Declared Age Range API will fetch the specific user age bracket (Under 13, 13-15, 16-17, or 18+) and a verification method. The Significant Change API (PermissionKit) will trigger a system dialog for parental consent if an app gets a major update or an age-rating shift. There is also a new property type in StoreKit that allows developers to automatically check when their app’s age rating has changed on a user’s device and then use the Significant Change API to request parental consent. Finally, App Store Server Notifications can be configured to tell developers when a parent revokes consent, blocking app launches. To ensure they are ready for these changes, developers must immediately use Apple’s sandbox testing environment to validate these APIs in their apps. For any developers out there finding this to be inconvenient, get used to it. Other regions, such as Utah, Louisiana, and Brazil, are looking at, or have implemented, similar rules.
    • They should show the onedrive recycle bin in a searchable manner and on app not just on the website
    • You looking at a phone or something? On my 4K HDR monitor it is frikking spectacular.
    • The Surface Pro 7+ already has a USB C port which can be used for everything you mentioned, except for eGPUs. Meanwhile, microsoft have gotten rid of ALL of the following that are present in the Surface Pro 7+:
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      230
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      60
    5. 5
      neufuse
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!