Recommended Posts

They really need to Fix Media Player 11 in vista, when it just runs in the back ground for no reason. And sometimes if you actually use media player to watch a video, it won't close correctly. You'll still hear the audio but media player is gone. Only way to get rid of it is to kill it in the task manager. Had it happen on 32bit and 64 bit Vista.

WMP doesn't run in the background on my machine except when I have it open. If you're talking about "wmpnscfg.exe" it's the media sharing stub and you should be able to disable it in msconfig if it bothers you.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
WMP doesn't run in the background on my machine except when I have it open. If you're talking about "wmpnscfg.exe" it's the media sharing stub and you should be able to disable it in msconfig if it bothers you.

I have the same problem when I'm on vista, wmplayer.exe stays open all the time after I close the application

Am i the only one who generally thinks that WMP is crap, lol?

No, you are not the only one, but for me WMP11 is the best one and after it Itunes is te second best (itunes 8 is quite nice), but let me guess some resons you don't like WMP:

- You don't have a big music library;

- You don't use/care to tag the music files correctly;

- You don't care about album art;

- You find your songs by folders (and WMP11 can do that)

But I understand that most of the people don't use the above "items".

  • 2 weeks later...

Haven't bothered to read all 10 posts, I don't get why there are two development teams (possibly 3) for:

1) Windows Media Player

2) Windows Media Center

3) Zune 3.0 software

Now I know WMC is in its own league but I couldnt see why WMP and Zune couldnt merge into one. Apple did it with iTunes and as far as I've heard Zune software is a worthy competitor to iTunes. WMP+Zune = consistent and awesome!

No, you are not the only one, but for me WMP11 is the best one and after it Itunes is te second best (itunes 8 is quite nice), but let me guess some resons you don't like WMP:

- You don't have a big music library;

- You don't use/care to tag the music files correctly;

- You don't care about album art;

- You find your songs by folders (and WMP11 can do that)

But I understand that most of the people don't use the above "items".

I do.

I do.

I do.

I don't.

And I still don't like WMP. :p

Good for you. But what's the point of coming into a WMP thread if you don't like it? :rolleyes: Go in a thread that is dedicated to what you like.

1. I was answering him.

2. I never use it for music, but I still need to use it to test video playback.

;)

The top half of the program should use the Aero style IE and Explorer use, with the search box in the same consistent place. I've made a quick mock below.

post-93295-1224706784_thumb.jpg

that mockup looks really nice, would make it look very consistent with explorer and ie looking like that.

Haven't bothered to read all 10 posts, I don't get why there are two development teams (possibly 3) for:

1) Windows Media Player

2) Windows Media Center

3) Zune 3.0 software

Now I know WMC is in its own league but I couldnt see why WMP and Zune couldnt merge into one. Apple did it with iTunes and as far as I've heard Zune software is a worthy competitor to iTunes. WMP+Zune = consistent and awesome!

+1

The Zune software is lightyears ahead of iTunes (and WMP) as far as music goes. You'd think they could integrate the rest of WMP into it.

-Spenser

That's not a mockup, that looks like a screenshot from Windows 7.

I have win 7 it does not have the aero border.

BTW read his post dude!

The top half of the program should use the Aero style IE and Explorer use, with the search box in the same consistent place. I've made a quick mock below.
Gapless playback?

*crosses fingers*

All the UI changes in the world don't amount to a hill of beans if WMP sucks at the actual playback of files.

Pat added that years ago in ... WMP9(?) or so via the cross-fading plug-in. Turn that on and set to 0 - that's how it's set by default.

Note that for a while there there was extensive ... "distribution" of the "Radium" FhG codec AKA the renamed FhG MP3 Professional codec. That was/is single-instance and would break gapless playback of MP3 files. But if you don't have that, gapless playback should work today already for you.

Pat added that years ago in ... WMP9(?) or so via the cross-fading plug-in. Turn that on and set to 0 - that's how it's set by default.
:rolleyes: Cross-fading isn't close to being real gapless playback.

Basically all that setting does is skip silence. What if the track is supposed to have some silence at the end (and/or beginning) of it?

Gapless playback requires the file encoder to store gapless info in the headers as part of the file format (ie LAME or XING headers for mp3), and a decoder capable of reading this information. Currently all directShow players cannot do this, including WMP.

The .wma encoders don't even store gapless information.

So, the question still stands, is this added to WMP12 (and thus to DirectShow) in Windows 7?

Edited by shakey_snake
Any information on the upcoming Windows Media Player and what file formats will it support? And when will it be release?

I read on another forum that it plays all formats without installing any codecs!!

The user said he loves it coz its faster than 11... is lighter and it played all the files that needed him to install codec packs in the past..

Something to get excited abt :p

:rolleyes: Cross-fading isn't close to being real gapless playback.

Basically all that setting does is skip silence. What if the track is supposed to have some silence at the end (and/or beginning) of it?

You're incorrect, so the eye rolls is thus seemingly overplayed. :)

Basically all that setting does when set to 0 (as I pointed out is the default setting) is play the tracks seamlessly back to back. If there is some silence at the end (and/or beginning) that silence is played and the next track is begun. The definition of track is first sample to last sample. Content of that sample is irrelevant.

You might have further problems with the implementation (for example the noted problem of people who insert their own single-instance Mp3 decoders), but you at least by your own words don't understand the current implementation which makes me think you may not have actually tried it. ?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
    • Samsung Galaxy XR arrives in the UK with new AI and enterprise features by Fiza Ali Samsung is bringing its Galaxy XR headset to the UK several months after the device made its debut as the first headset built on Google's Android XR platform. The headset was first teased in late 2024 alongside Google's introduction of Android XR before making its commercial debut in 2025. Developed in collaboration with Google and Qualcomm, Galaxy XR combines mixed reality experiences with Gemini-powered AI features, allowing users to interact with digital content using voice, gestures, and visual inputs. While the hardware itself remains largely unchanged from the version Samsung unveiled last year, the company is using the UK launch to spotlight several software enhancements that have arrived through recent updates. Among the most notable additions is deeper integration with Google's ecosystem. Galaxy XR users can explore destinations through Google Maps' Immersive View, receiving AI-powered recommendations and contextual information from Gemini while navigating virtual environments. Furthermore, entertainment experiences have also expanded; users can watch 180-degree and 360-degree videos on YouTube, browse spatial content converted into 3D, and ask Gemini questions about on-screen content without interrupting playback. Samsung is also highlighting mixed-reality features such as Circle to Search, which allows users to identify real-world objects through hand gestures while using the headset's video pass-through mode. Another feature automatically converts photos and videos into spatial 3D experiences. Moreover, the headset now also supports Android Enterprise, allowing organisations to manage deployments using existing Android management tools. Annika Bizon, Vice President, Product and Marketing, Mobile Experience, Samsung UK & Ireland, talked about the device, stating: The headset is powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 platform and features dual 4K Micro-OLED displays. The tech giant says that users can expect up to 2.5 hours of battery life. Samsung also confirmed that Galaxy XR will continue receiving software and security updates as the company works alongside Google and Qualcomm to expand the Android XR ecosystem. Galaxy XR is now available for pre-order and will go on sale on 8 July. Customers interested in trying the headset before launch can visit Samsung KX in London and selected Samsung Experience Stores from 17 June. Finally, the company will also host a livestream on 19 June showcasing the headset's capabilities and answering questions from prospective customers.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      95
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!