-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Similar Content
-
Save 35% on Sony's SS-CS5M2 3-way high-res bookshelf speakers
By TarasBuria,
- sony
- amazon deals
- (and 3 more)
- 0 replies
- 0 views
-
- 0 replies
- 0 views
-
Until Dawn 2 revealed featuring new cast, new story, and new developer
By LoneWolfSL,
- sony
- state of play
- (and 4 more)
- 6 replies
- 0 views
-
God of War Laufey announced, introducing Kratos' wife as new protagonist
By LoneWolfSL,
- state of play
- sony
- (and 4 more)
- 1 reply
- 0 views
-
Wolverine gameplay shows off an X-Men team up, September release date confirmed
By LoneWolfSL,
- sony
- state of play
- (and 5 more)
- 1 reply
- 0 views
-
-
Posts
-
By Snake Doc · Posted
After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in may areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues. -
By ikjadoon · Posted
It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI. -
By ikjadoon · Posted
Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost. -
By ikjadoon · Posted
I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing. -
By ikjadoon · Posted
It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
slackerzz earned a badge
One Year In
-
highriskpaym earned a badge
One Year In
-
highriskpaym earned a badge
One Month Later
-
highriskpaym earned a badge
Week One Done
-
FBSPL earned a badge
Week One Done
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Tell a friend
.thumb.png.b7089ebbdf00d96b3b92dddbd04bac02.png)
Recommended Posts