Windows Vista Service Pack 1 RTM x86 leaked


Recommended Posts

When will people learn, DON'T DOWNLOAD LEADKED FILES I would not have installed it to be honest but people will jump into the fire and get burned.

Oh it's funny how misinformed you are...

Yeah. As much as I'd like to use the leaked slipstream'd ISO, I'm a bit wary without seeing official MD5 sums from MS proving its not been tampered with in anyway. Call me paranoid but its not something I'd feel safe putting my legal product key in.

As I mentioned in the other thread:

Actually, if you extract the files inside the exe using for example, Windows6.0-KB936330-X86.exe /x , then you'll see the inside files are exactly identical to the 18000 ones that are floating around so the *only* difference is the packing exe that MS used. Also worth pointing out is the 18000 ones that are floating around have the exact same MD5 that reviewers got so they're legit too, only difference being MS just used a different packing exe for the bits on the OEM site and on Connect apparently.

After Install SP1 my laptop won't wake up from sleep

funny, you should be a beta tester.....lol. SP1 is running good for me. I've not had a problem at all. I wasn't having problems prior to RTM version either so...It really has taught me that updating your hardware goes well with Vista working well for you.

So there are a couple of SP1 installers build on 19 and 31 of Jan. Both 18000 builds final (time 1840 and 2040 the latest one).

But it is said (at least for the 1st installer) that your machine can get gaught in a reboot loop (when SP1 is updating drivers?) and

also there are some problems when installed on the Media Center.

What about the DVD images of Vista that have integrated the SP1:

6001.18000.080118-1840_x86fre_Client_en-us-FRMCFRE_EN_DVD.iso (for example) are these also affected too?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      137
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!