Firefox 3 drops Vista look  

631 members have voted

  1. 1. If Firefox 3 Drops the Vista Native 'Look' will you continue to use Firefox?

    • Yes
      340
    • No
      133
    • Let's get this confirmed by Mozilla first
      158


Recommended Posts

Guys, try this userstyle

http://userstyles.org/styles/5093

*Smack* *smack*

Both mainly wrong. Its not a User theme. Yes. They are the same, but they just use the fix basically via Stylish. Thats all.

if you look at the link i supplied, you can see that.

Firefox does not look fine as it is, it's the fugliest browser I have ever used, I have been waiting for the "Vista" look to show up inthe FF3 beta's to give it a try. If they decide not to add it then I will not be considering using it.

That's the ugliest reply I've ever seen in a Firefox thread.

FF is not ugly by default, all it needs is a little customisation (read: customisation) to be a really nice to look at and use browser.

After all, Firefox is a browser for the web surfer who likes to take control of his or her web browsing experience.

That's the ugliest reply I've ever seen in a Firefox thread.

FF is not ugly by default, all it needs is a little customisation (read: customisation) to be a really nice to look at and use browser.

After all, Firefox is a browser for the web surfer who likes to take control of his or her web browsing experience.

That looks better, but it doesn't look "good". IE will always reign as long as it looks better than FF. It comes on all Windows PCs and it works fine....plus the RSS integration looks wonderful

2mw9tw0.png

Edited by Intelman

That's true but it is not better than firefox purely based on the fact it's less secure (you cannot block ads flat out like you can in FF so a rogue ad even on a legit site cannot compromise you in FF with filterset updaters enabled in Adblock in FF)

Not only that but FF has way more features...

I'm confused as to why people care so much about how their browser looks. When you're using the internet, wouldn't you pay more attention to the actual page displayed rather than the browser?

But some people complain about anti virus/anti spyware GUI's and even zip program GUI's. It is as though they care more about how it looks than how it works.

I dunno, I block ads with IE7 pro just fine...and it is in Vista, I run as a non admin like everyone should, I'm not really at risk for malware...

http://www.ie7pro.com/

Adblock for FF is the "only" proper adblock, no other browser has a more robust extension either third party or built in that Firefox - this is a 100% fact.

But some people complain about anti virus/anti spyware GUI's and even zip program GUI's. It is as though they care more about how it looks than how it works.

Indeed :/

Radish?

LOL, And to think that I use Firefox for its useability, performance and overall stable designs. If you want it to look like Vista code a theme for it or wait till one is made and posted on firefox addon themes site. jeez such ranting over a simple thing like [Well if they dont make it look like this then ill go use something else] Keep the bloatware iexplore (sic) I'll stick with Firefox it performs changes and listens to its loyal users as to what is needed to get through and survive todays web.

Wow, I'm surprised by some of the replies and how many nos there are in the poll. Who cares what it looks like if it works? FF (to me) is a thousand times better than IE, and it looks just fine to me. Not to mention the fact that I always use my browser maximized, so I don't want some silly glass look getting in the way.

And even though IE7 is a decent browser, and perhaps you can get plugins (IE pro or whatever it is) to block ads, there are too many other things that I use in FF that IE doesn't have that I can't live without. I can too quickly click CTRL+L, type in a domain name, then press CTRL/SHIFT/CTRL+SHIFT Enter to go to whatever website I want. I realize that IE has ALT+D and CTRL+Enter, but I like the auto completes for .net and .org as well, and I'm used to CTRL+L now.

I can think of a nice list of things that Firefox has and IE doesn't, but can't think of anything that IE has that Firefox doesn't, and looks certainly don't count for anything for me, so IE7 will never replace Firefox for me.

Then again, I have a Macbook as my main machine at home now, so it really makes little difference to me anymore. I still have a PC at home and use a PC at work though, so I'm not completely out of it.

Why they want to keep firefox ugly? Cant be so hard to make it with vista looks.

I?ll keep using firefox anyways but a interface compatible with vista would be nice.

Exactly. Just a little more effort from Mozilla would be great. I don't like any of the user created themes out there. No really anyway.

[*] Glass in the Toolbars would be impossible.

I actually tried to do it.

I set the background to black, and make the call to extend glass.

This was the result:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=265448

Basically, the only issues seemed to be with the two text boxes. They're apparently drawing bitmaps so that alpha transparency works perfectly fine on top, they're just not rendering text properly for it. If they fix the text issue, glass would work beautifully.

I recommend that everyone goes over to this page on bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367993

and votes for this....Hopefully renewed interest in this bug would help.

OR, if anyone understands how Firefox works, and wants to try patching it so that the text is rendered properly, that'd be spectacular.

Edited by MioTheGreat
I actually tried to do it.

I set the background to black, and make the call to extend glass.

This was the result:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=265448

Basically, the only issues seemed to be with the two text boxes. They're apparently drawing bitmaps so that alpha transparency works perfectly fine on top, they're just not rendering text properly for it. If they fix the text issue, glass would work beautifully.

I recommend that everyone goes over to this page on bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367993

and votes for this....Hopefully renewed interest in this bug would help.

OR, if anyone understands how Firefox works, and wants to try patching it so that the text is rendered properly, that'd be spectacular.

I realllly hope someone gives it a shot. That'd be pretty awesome... that right there looks quite badass.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
    • Password Safe 3.72.0 by Razvan Serea Password Safe is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination"), instead of all the username/password combinations that you use. Once stored, your user names and passwords are just a few clicks away. Using Password Safe you can organize your passwords using your own customizable references—for example, by user ID, category, web site, or location. You can choose to store all your passwords in a single encrypted master password list (an encrypted password database), or use multiple databases to further organize your passwords (work and home, for example). And with its intuitive interface you will be up and running in minutes. PasswordSafe was originally designed by the renowned security technologist Bruce Schneier and released as a free utility application. Password Safe 3.72.0 changelog: Fixed bugs Improved font scale handling - should resolve font size issues on high resolution displays. GH1749 In the Master Password Setup window, "Show Master Password" is no longer truncated on some displays. GH1092, SF1595 Size and position of main window is now correctly restored on scaled displays. SF1630 Keep password expiry date when both password and password expiry are changed; don't clear a non-recurring expiry when the password's changed. SF1628 Custom values can now be copied to the clipboard in read-only mode via Ctrl-C and right-click->Copy Value. New features GH1196 Dark display mode support: Password Safe now supports the system display mode, as well as setting the mode directly via Manage->Options->Display->Display Mode. This change also updates the general "look & feel" of the app to the current Windows theme. Known limitations: The Date picker and keyboard shortcut controls do not switch to dark theme The Customize Toolbar dialog does not switch to dark theme Custom Field support has been added to the more advanced features: Filters XML and Text import and export Comparison, Sync and Merge databases SF938 Custom field values may now be selected by name and copied via a "Copy Custom Field Value..." submenu in the entry context popup menu. SF936 Notes and Custom fields layout now overlap, selectable by tabs, resulting in a more compact and less cluttered layout. SF935 Autotype: Specifying '\v{name}' in the autotype text will cause the corresponding value to be autotyped. Download: PasswordSafe 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: PasswordSafe 32-bit | Portable 32-bit View: PasswordSafe Website | Quickstart Guide | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!