Firefox 3 drops Vista look  

631 members have voted

  1. 1. If Firefox 3 Drops the Vista Native 'Look' will you continue to use Firefox?

    • Yes
      340
    • No
      133
    • Let's get this confirmed by Mozilla first
      158


Recommended Posts

Some of the posts on here have bothered me so much that I need to reply.

Personally, I think it's a little extreme to say that you will switch browsers because of the theme not looking awesome. However, on the other end, to say that the look of the browser doesn't matter is equally retarded.

The fact of the matter is this: Firefox does not integrate well on Windows. It currently (FF2) integrates even worse on OS X, and on Linux. This is a big deal for many people. The visual look of an application is important. It's not as important as the functionality, but it's still up there.

Mozilla took it upon themselves to fix the visual look of Firefox on it's respective platforms. Where Firefox 3 stands currently, on both Mac OS X and Linux (at least on the GTK side), Mozilla has done a phenomenal job! Upon looking at the wonderful job they did on those platforms, Windows users should be excited that Firefox 3 will look fantastic. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Where it stands right now, Mozilla has completely dropped the ball on Windows. It's sad, since not only are the majority of Firefox users on Windows, but given the fantastic job they did on Linux and OS X, why couldn't they replicate that for Windows?

To those who say: "Just download a theme! Firefox is completely skin-able!" While it is true that Firefox can be modified with themes and skins, it's also true that the vast majority of skins out there are outright terrible. Of all the Firefox Vista themes out there, there is only 1 skin that truly looks amazing on Vista. That is this theme here: http://internauta2000.deviantart.com/art/F...k-Beta-45665026. There is one massive problem though: He never updates it. That theme is currently only available for Firefox 2, and I'm doubtful it will come out for Firefox 3.

I'm also not going to make my own theme. Like the vast majority of users out there, I don't have the time and patience to make a theme. For that reason, it would be excellent if Mozilla made a theme that was so awesome, I would never even consider seeking another.

That is why people are ****ed off! We want an application that looks native on the OS, and if you could do it for Linux and OS X, why not Windows?

I really agree here. I am not going to stop using firefox over it but still they should be a ble to come up with a MUCH better looking vista skin after what they have done on OSX and linux. I can never find ANY theme I like for firefox, most of them are crap. I just want it to look native and fit in with vista.

but for years firefox has been past the "decent" looking phase. So, thus, it would be stupid NOW, to ditch it because it doesn't look like vista. There are some apps with god awful UI's, in those cases, YES, it becomes uber critical almost.

Secondly, No one responded to my comment where WMP11 doesn't really match vista either.

Lastly, a good look depends on who's judging, that theme linked above, the one that is the "only" good theme for FF, well I personally think is ugly. Not my taste, period.

This is FF, an established browser, and given this, MOST of the complaints on here are ridiculous.

(if it were not established/around for years, etc, or an upcoming app, where the UI was not up to modern standards, then the complaints here would make sense.)

but for years firefox has been past the "decent" looking phase. So, thus, it would be stupid NOW, to ditch it because it doesn't look like vista. There are some apps with god awful UI's, in those cases, YES, it becomes uber critical almost.

Secondly, No one responded to my comment where WMP11 doesn't really match vista either.

Lastly, a good look depends on who's judging, that theme linked above, the one that is the "only" good theme for FF, well I personally think is ugly. Not my taste, period.

This is FF, an established browser, and given this, MOST of the complaints on here are ridiculous.

(if it were not established/around for years, etc, or an upcoming app, where the UI was not up to modern standards, then the complaints here would make sense.)

WMP doesn't match Vista? It uses extended glass, and the buttons on that bar are very "Aeroesque". The bar's gradient color matches the taskbar overlay, and the button styles match the taskbar buttons perfectly.

(It's also the only real media player that comes with Vista to define what the Vista style for a media player is.)

Ok, everybody says they want a more native interface, without elaborating on it (I've read firefox needs to look more "modern", without any explanation to what "modern" actually is")

Anyway, what exactly do you guys mean by native?

Who gives a damn what the Default theme looks like? The people who care about the look of it know where they can get other themes, and the people who don't care will most probably be fine with a Vista-like look. And somebody who'd switch to a different web browser because he doesn't like the oh my god so horrible Vista look must be insane anyways.

Anyway, what exactly do you guys mean by native?

I guess that would mean Firefox would/could look like IE7 or Explorer, toolbar wise, or even use Vista's GUI completely instead of Chrome.

Firefox does not look fine as it is, it's the fugliest browser I have ever used, I have been waiting for the "Vista" look to show up inthe FF3 beta's to give it a try. If they decide not to add it then I will not be considering using it.

That is your opinion. There are several themes that you can install to change the look.

Mozilla did a great job integrating Linux and OS X themes.

They've given *uckall to Windows users. Honestly, I don't think they care at all. Or at least they've not put as much spit and polish on the Windows themes as they have for other platforms. I don't see any point in complaining, because if no one will listen to the 40-page long thread about how the Windows look should be changed, they aren't going to pay any attention to this thread on Neowin.

Mozilla did a great job integrating Linux and OS X themes.

They've given *uckall to Windows users. Honestly, I don't think they care at all. Or at least they've not put as much spit and polish on the Windows themes as they have for other platforms. I don't see any point in complaining, because if no one will listen to the 40-page long thread about how the Windows look should be changed, they aren't going to pay any attention to this thread on Neowin.

I agree with the fact that they haven't given anything to Windows users yet; however, Firefox 3 is still in BETA stage, so maybe Mozilla are still perfecting the theme and trying new things. no-one knows for sure yet, so it's best not to bash them until they release final version really, don't you agree?

Dumb move Mozilla.

They may not drop the Vista theme. It's not been confirmed yet as to whether the the Vista theme or the XP theme will be used for both Windows OSs, so don't judge Mozilla yet; hopefully they'll see that the Windows Vista theme is the way forward and they will perfect that :p

Amen to that! Why can't they just make IE display pages properly! (Now IE 8 passes the Acid2 test, hopefully it will)...

Really? Last I heard, IE8 wasn't even going to apply CSS styles to new HTML 5 elements: http://intertwingly.net/blog/2007/12/07/HT...s-Viewed-By-IE8

They may not drop the Vista theme. It's not been confirmed yet as to whether the the Vista theme or the XP theme will be used for both Windows OSs, so don't judge Mozilla yet; hopefully they'll see that the Windows Vista theme is the way forward and they will perfect that :p
Correct, but it has been confirmed that neither set of icons will be dropped:

http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2008/02/10...refox-3s-icons/

While many of these icons are currently featured in the nightly builds, and will be in Beta 3, several of the icons shown here are newer and haven’t landed yet (most notably updates to the keyhole back/forward form). The Vista icons are currently checked in, but haven’t been enabled in the nightly builds yet. This is because we are going to ship one theme on Windows, and determine the correct icons to display at runtime. Since the chrome overrides aren’t set up, we automatically default to the XP icons on Vista, and (as some people have pointed out) this looks rather funky. We should get that issue corrected soon.
I actually tried to do it.

I set the background to black, and make the call to extend glass.

This was the result:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=265448

Basically, the only issues seemed to be with the two text boxes. They're apparently drawing bitmaps so that alpha transparency works perfectly fine on top, they're just not rendering text properly for it. If they fix the text issue, glass would work beautifully.

Dude, nice work. But I have a feeling that if it was really that simple, it would have been implemented sometime in the last year and a half ff3 has been in development.

I mean, what does it look like if you load an extension like the Web developer toolbar?

Is it likely your enhancement will be added to ff3 blocker list?

I mean, what does it look like if you load an extension like the Web developer toolbar?

Those kind of toolbars aren't rendered with glass under IE, so I don't forsee a problem, so long as you keep it below the address bar.

But as I said, someone has to fix the text rendering issue before Extended Glass in Firefox is possible.

I agree with the fact that they haven't given anything to Windows users yet; however, Firefox 3 is still in BETA stage, so maybe Mozilla are still perfecting the theme and trying new things. no-one knows for sure yet, so it's best not to bash them until they release final version really, don't you agree?

No, I don't think they will change at all. They are clearly more committed to convincing people that they should like the ****ty theme as opposed to spending time and energy trying to improve it.

Lets see, for OS X, they created brand new toolbar icons to mimic the color scheme and shape, as well as integrating the window to the titlebar like some native applications.

On the Vista theme, we see the menus that Vista has mostly ditched for "action toolbars", the ugly borders that were ditched when the Aero interface was created, thick, distinct embossing around the navigation buttons that look like a 12-year old made his first time in Photoshop, square interface elements such as text boxes, where in Vista, the corners are slightly rounded off, extra borders at the bottom of the website Identity button and the Search provider menu button, and yes, icons (look at the Home icon, its from XP) which do not conform in color, shape, thickness, or really with any actual icons from Vista. Padding and margins between interface elements make the interface seem crowded together. The chrome does not integrate smoothly with the Aero interface, unlike in the Unified appearance on OS X.

From what they've cobbled together so far, the interface on Windows was an experiment that went wrong, but they don't care enough to completely scrap and redo it.

For those who haven't seen, someone posted this to the glass discussion on Bugzilla:

attachment1jd6.png

It was done with existing code, using a few extra css tweaks. Looks pretty good to me, if somebody does a theme with that, I'll be totally happy with it.

Link to Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367993

So that's my issue. I don't want a browser that looks out of place in Vista.

Wow. That statement really just seems to fit the entire Microsoft/Windows culture. It's like you guys let insignificant things cloud your judgment on what really matters in software (web browsers, operating systems, etc.). Nevermind the underlying security of the browser or how well it conforms to web standards...nah, let's base our decision on how well it fits the Vista theme.

Good grief...how misguided is that logic?

IE7 integrates well into Vista in ways other than appearance. It runs as a low-privledge process (Protected Mode), renders things quickly, has good Javascript performance, Quick Tabs (which Firefox is still currently missing), and the ability to extend functionality via Addons.

The glass looks interesting, but you can see that the interface was never designed for a glass background (not that it looked great on that bright purplish blue one that they were using).

Wow. That statement really just seems to fit the entire Microsoft/Windows culture. It's like you guys let insignificant things cloud your judgment on what really matters in software (web browsers, operating systems, etc.). Nevermind the underlying security of the browser or how well it conforms to web standards...nah, let's base our decision on how well it fits the Vista theme.

Good grief...how misguided is that logic?

Er, no, that 'logic' is not misguided at all! People just have different opinions. I'm doing a software engineering degree at university and I agree that the features are the most important part of software; however, the user interface also has to be friendly and intuitive, as well as nice to look at. Whilst Firefox 3's UI is somewhat user friendly, it certainly isn't nice to look at and many people use that as the deciding factor on whether they will use the web browser or not.

It isn't logic, it's personal opinion and it certainly isn't "misguided".

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Password Safe 3.72.0 by Razvan Serea Password Safe is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination"), instead of all the username/password combinations that you use. Once stored, your user names and passwords are just a few clicks away. Using Password Safe you can organize your passwords using your own customizable references—for example, by user ID, category, web site, or location. You can choose to store all your passwords in a single encrypted master password list (an encrypted password database), or use multiple databases to further organize your passwords (work and home, for example). And with its intuitive interface you will be up and running in minutes. PasswordSafe was originally designed by the renowned security technologist Bruce Schneier and released as a free utility application. Password Safe 3.72.0 changelog: Fixed bugs Improved font scale handling - should resolve font size issues on high resolution displays. GH1749 In the Master Password Setup window, "Show Master Password" is no longer truncated on some displays. GH1092, SF1595 Size and position of main window is now correctly restored on scaled displays. SF1630 Keep password expiry date when both password and password expiry are changed; don't clear a non-recurring expiry when the password's changed. SF1628 Custom values can now be copied to the clipboard in read-only mode via Ctrl-C and right-click->Copy Value. New features GH1196 Dark display mode support: Password Safe now supports the system display mode, as well as setting the mode directly via Manage->Options->Display->Display Mode. This change also updates the general "look & feel" of the app to the current Windows theme. Known limitations: The Date picker and keyboard shortcut controls do not switch to dark theme The Customize Toolbar dialog does not switch to dark theme Custom Field support has been added to the more advanced features: Filters XML and Text import and export Comparison, Sync and Merge databases SF938 Custom field values may now be selected by name and copied via a "Copy Custom Field Value..." submenu in the entry context popup menu. SF936 Notes and Custom fields layout now overlap, selectable by tabs, resulting in a more compact and less cluttered layout. SF935 Autotype: Specifying '\v{name}' in the autotype text will cause the corresponding value to be autotyped. Download: PasswordSafe 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: PasswordSafe 32-bit | Portable 32-bit View: PasswordSafe Website | Quickstart Guide | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google DeepMind published a document on June 18, 2026, that may be the most consequential admission yet from a frontier AI lab: alignment training alone cannot guarantee that AI agents will remain under human control, so structural containment must be built before more capable models arrive.............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318758/20260620/google-deepmind-ai-control-roadmap-when-alignment-fails-defense-depth-takes-over.htm  
    • I've got a SoundBlasterX G6 that I use in my streaming setup. Sounds great to me and I've had zero issues with the ancient software package so far in Win11. That G6 has 7.1, Dolby, fully working SPDIF and since it's a USB device it's outside of my rig so I don't have to worry about EMF distortion. Looks like for now this is a pass for me as I think I have better hardware....
    • How do you connect 5.1 Speakers to this thing?
    • I agree with both of you... It's absolutely imperative that science is completely based on actual proven facts and hard evidence and is not considered dogmatic in any way. Science is not a religion and it will never be, and that's exactly how it's supposed to be.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!