Recommended Posts

Anyone here remember that falconarrow guy on Reddit (who seemed to have insider information on storylines/debuts)? He's back, and suddenly I'm looking forward to Raw, the crafty bastard.

 

Quote

Regardless of whatever trash last night was, watch Raw from beginning to end tonight.


You just might get an early christmas present.

Then most recently...

Quote

I know what it is and as of now it begins the show.


Always subject to change though.

 

Meltzer confirmed what /u/falconarrow said.


This might be my last Raw. I was heavily leaning towards stopping watching after the Roman instant-heal at the end of the match. Whatever this surprise is will decide one way or the other. 

 

I like Brock/Ambrose, I love Owens, and New Day is always awesome. But if I could pay say $5 a month and just get NXT, I would do that. 

14 minutes ago, jamwheat said:

Well, Holy Sheetz....Shane O'Mac just appeared on RAW to a sstunning crowd ovation.

now it has been ruined by Shane vs Undertaker, Hell in a Cell for control of Raw/the company.  That kinda flopped after a good buildup.

Wow, can't believe Shane is back, that's awesome. Not so awesome they just threw him into a match with Undertaker in a HitC? For control of RAW whatever? What is this, 2002?

 

Also, guess that was right about whoever was facing UT at WM wasn't an active roster wrestler lol I wonder how many bumps Shane will take, and how much he can go at his age now. I mean, the dude is 15 years older now, hasn't been in a ring in the same amount of years I assume, and well, UT isn't a spring chicken either.

Holly ######, I really didn't see that coming! I got goosebumps when Shane's music hit. Best moment of RAW, no doubt about it. As for the match with Taker, don't worry, he won't wrestle, he will have someone else to fight for him. And there can be only one of 3 men: Sting, Angle or Goldberg. My money goes to Goldberg.

52 minutes ago, TDT said:

Holly ######, I really didn't see that coming! I got goosebumps when Shane's music hit. Best moment of RAW, no doubt about it. As for the match with Taker, don't worry, he won't wrestle, he will have someone else to fight for him. And there can be only one of 3 men: Sting, Angle or Goldberg. My money goes to Goldberg.

I'm going with Sting.

Just now, MightyJordan said:

I'm going with Sting.

Well that would be the obvious choice, that's why I don't think it will happen. People EXPECT to see that and if this year's WM is a follow-up to last year's one, when we got both DX and nWo with HUGE reactions, they won't deliver something so predictable. At least that's what I hope. :)

21 minutes ago, TDT said:

Well that would be the obvious choice, that's why I don't think it will happen. People EXPECT to see that and if this year's WM is a follow-up to last year's one, when we got both DX and nWo with HUGE reactions, they won't deliver something so predictable. At least that's what I hope. :)

why goldberg?

24 minutes ago, TDT said:

Well that would be the obvious choice, that's why I don't think it will happen. People EXPECT to see that and if this year's WM is a follow-up to last year's one, when we got both DX and nWo with HUGE reactions, they won't deliver something so predictable. At least that's what I hope. :)

I'm thinking the opposite, that because it's the obvious and predictable choice, that's what's gonna happen. WWE have a habit for it; it's only once in a blue moon that we get a real big surprise like last night's return of the Shane-O-Mac (which I would've commented on here if there wasn't a tweet stuck in the text box on the mobile site that I can't clear).

13 minutes ago, DaddyRazzy said:

why goldberg?

Because that's what people wanted for so many years. They already got Sting, the other big one that's still missing is Goldberg. Like I said in a previous post, I don't know what's with this guy, but his lack of skills, either in wrestling or on mic, are well compensated by his charisma and intensity. I find it incredible that to this day there is NO one that got so much love from the crowd (a powerhouse I mean). People always loved him and he always got incredible reactions from fans, imagine the reaction he would get after so many years. For me, this is the final moment I want to experience before I quit watching wrestling. There's no point to go on, today I don't get even 5% of the excitement I once got, and that's not necessarily because of the product, but because of the age, the other priorities that I have,  etc. I guess I'll always be stuck in the WCW period, that was a great part of my childhood, that's why I'm always hyped when we get returns like at last year's WM, or Booker's Rumble return and so on.

Vince dropped an F-bomb on Raw, so expect him to get a 60-day suspension. /s Or worse...

 

Quote

Vince McMahon, the sports-entertainment impresario who turned professional wrestling into a billion-dollar juggernaut, has fired himself from WWE for swearing on live television.

 

“We cannot allow that kind of crude language on-air,” McMahon told reporters this morning after giving his notice of termination to the WWE Board of Directors.

 

When confronting his son Shane, who made a surprise return to WWE on this week’s episode of Monday Night Raw, an enraged McMahon uttered the f-word (not “fake,” the other one).

 

The mogul vowed to give his son a “[expletive] beating,” which sparked controversy not only for its use of a curse word, but also for its implication that Vince could ever beat Shane, who once fell off the TitanTron for crying out loud.

 

Upon firing himself, McMahon was initially infuriated, but eventually admitted: “Vince screwed Vince.”

 

Quote

There is a strange listing on Ticketmaster for the Monday Night Raw in Baltimore, Maryland the night after the pay-per-view in Newark, New Jersey that is now Extreme Rules: As of this writing, the show is billed as “WWE Monday Night RAW vs. WWE.” On one hand, this could be absolutely nothing, as Ticketmaster listings for WWE events being incorrect and/or oddly formatted is not out of the ordinary at all. On the other hand, this sounds like it plays directly into the Shane McMahon storyline that started on last night’s edition of Raw: If Shane beats The Undertaker in a Hell in a Cell match at WrestleMania, he gets control of Raw, or at least that’s how it was specified in the promo.

 

Again, it could easily be nothing, but today, it’s very easy to read it as something, so we’ll have to see what happens.

http://www.sescoops.com/shane-mcmahon-joins-twitter-odd-wwe-ticket-listing/

Well, as for Sting vs Undertaker at Wrestlemania- is Sting even well enough to wrestle after his neck injury?  I haven't heard anything about it yet, so no ideas.  Still trying to figure our how Shane can make it "some one else" being in the match instead of himself-  it would have to be something in the way Vince worded the "deal".

Fan theory time...

Quote

On the August 2, 1999 episode of RAW (available on the Network), Shane McMahon disbands the Corporate Ministry. Starting at about the 25:12 mark, Shane says:


"Now as it relates to the Corporate Ministry, the entire Corporate Ministry is now free to do whatever they want to whomever they want, until I deem it necessary to bring everybody back together ...."


So all Shane needs to do win control of RAW is to recall the Corporate Ministry and direct the Undertaker to lay down for him at Mania.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SquaredCircle/comments/478cq4/remember_that_spoiler_has_the_ability_to/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!